Week 2 · updated Oct 11, 2026
Week 2 quarterbacks usage report.
C.J. Stroud leads this week's role-trend ranking after playing 100% of offensive snaps and recording 58 attempts + carries.
Players are ordered by the combination of snap-share change, opportunity change, and total involvement. The comparison uses each player's previous four recorded games when available.
| Rank | Player | Matchup | Snap share | Snap change | Attempts + carries | Opportunity change | Half PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | HOU · Redraft rank 133 | vs. CIN | 100% | +9 pts | 58 | +24.0 | 17.0 |
| #2 | NYJ · Redraft rank 168 | vs. GB | 100% | +9 pts | 46 | +20.0 | 15.6 |
| #3 | BAL · Redraft rank 40 | vs. NO | 100% | +16 pts | 35 | +15.0 | 14.8 |
| #4 | MIA · Redraft rank 194 | vs. SF | 100% | +36 pts | 25 | +3.3 | 12.5 |
| #5 | CLE · Redraft rank 162 | vs. TB | 100% | +18 pts | 37 | +10.8 | 19.7 |
| #6 | IND · Redraft rank 174 | vs. KC | 100% | +19 pts | 34 | +8.5 | 11.4 |
| #7 | PHI · Redraft rank 87 | vs. TEN | 100% | +8 pts | 42 | +11.8 | 16.2 |
| #8 | KC · Redraft rank 54 | vs. IND | 100% | +2 pts | 49 | +13.8 | 29.0 |
| #9 | DAL · Redraft rank 60 | vs. WAS | 100% | +15 pts | 35 | +4.5 | 29.8 |
| #10 | BUF · Redraft rank 18 | vs. DET | 100% | +0 pts | 45 | +9.5 | 40.8 |
| #11 | TEN · Redraft rank 167 | vs. PHI | 100% | +23 pts | 24 | -4.8 | 20.0 |
| #12 | GB · Redraft rank 119 | vs. NYJ | 100% | +16 pts | 29 | -2.8 | 13.8 |
| #13 | TB · Redraft rank 175 | vs. CLE | 100% | +0 pts | 38 | +4.0 | 12.2 |
| #14 | LV · Redraft rank 134 | vs. LAC | 100% | +0 pts | 33 | +0.3 | 20.2 |
| #15 | JAX · Redraft rank 65 | vs. DEN | 100% | +7 pts | 31 | -5.0 | 6.2 |
| #16 | CAR · Redraft rank 82 | vs. ATL | 94% | -4 pts | 37 | +0.8 | 24.1 |
| #17 | NO · Redraft rank 98 | vs. BAL | 100% | +1 pts | 43 | -2.0 | 22.4 |
| #18 | DET · Redraft rank 73 | vs. BUF | 100% | +0 pts | 41 | -1.5 | 29.8 |
| #19 | CIN · Redraft rank 51 | vs. HOU | 100% | +7 pts | 32 | -5.3 | 16.2 |
| #20 | LAR · Redraft rank 90 | vs. NYG | 100% | +5 pts | 35 | -4.3 | 27.0 |
| #21 | NE · Redraft rank 64 | vs. PIT | 100% | +11 pts | 26 | -9.3 | 8.0 |
| #22 | DEN · Redraft rank 118 | vs. JAX | 100% | +0 pts | 36 | -4.0 | 14.1 |
| #23 | LAC · Redraft rank 129 | vs. LV | 100% | +0 pts | 30 | -4.5 | 7.9 |
| #24 | PIT · Redraft rank 169 | vs. NE | 96% | -4 pts | 40 | -3.5 | 4.0 |
| #25 | ARI · Redraft rank 148 | vs. SEA | 100% | +0 pts | 29 | -7.5 | 6.5 |
| #26 | CHI · Redraft rank 62 | vs. MIN | 86% | -14 pts | 31 | -8.3 | 7.7 |
| #27 | SF · Redraft rank 52 | vs. MIA | 85% | -14 pts | 25 | -10.8 | 28.5 |
| #28 | WAS · Redraft rank 79 | vs. DAL | 55% | -28 pts | 24 | -7.3 | 14.7 |
A dash means the player did not have enough prior games for a comparison. Opportunity is attempts plus carries for quarterbacks, carries plus targets for running backs, and targets for receivers and tight ends.
Read the role
Volume can move before fantasy points do.
More snaps and opportunities can reveal an expanding role, while a one-week touchdown total can hide a shrinking one.
Use this report with matchup and availability context. It is not a projection or a start/sit ranking.