Week 2 · updated Nov 7, 2026
Week 2 running backs usage report.
Kenneth Walker leads this week's role-trend ranking after playing 82% of offensive snaps and recording 34 carries + targets.
Players are ordered by the combination of snap-share change, opportunity change, and total involvement. The comparison uses each player's previous four recorded games when available.
| Rank | Player | Matchup | Snap share | Snap change | Carries + targets | Opportunity change | Half PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | KC · Redraft rank 5 | vs. IND | 82% | +32 pts | 34 | +14.0 | 20.8 |
| #2 | DEN · Redraft rank 51 | vs. JAX | 40% | +34 pts | 13 | +13.0 | 13.3 |
| #3 | BUF · Redraft rank 10 | vs. DET | 74% | +28 pts | 24 | +8.8 | 20.4 |
| #4 | ATL · Redraft rank 173 | vs. CAR | 48% | +31 pts | 13 | +7.5 | 7.7 |
| #5 | JAX · Redraft rank 26 | vs. DEN | 51% | +27 pts | 15 | +8.8 | 13.2 |
| #6 | DAL · Redraft rank 21 | vs. WAS | 80% | +34 pts | 16 | +1.3 | 6.5 |
| #7 | MIN · Redraft rank 92 | vs. CHI | 81% | +23 pts | 23 | +4.5 | 10.5 |
| #8 | PIT · Redraft rank 29 | vs. NE | 71% | +32 pts | 15 | -0.8 | 8.7 |
| #9 | IND · Redraft rank 11 | vs. KC | 94% | +14 pts | 28 | +6.8 | 27.2 |
| #10 | CAR · Redraft rank 20 | vs. ATL | 65% | +16 pts | 14 | +5.5 | 13.4 |
| #11 | CHI · Redraft rank 18 | vs. MIN | 68% | +11 pts | 21 | +6.5 | 10.4 |
| #12 | NE · Redraft rank 131 | vs. PIT | 60% | +20 pts | 16 | +2.3 | 13.6 |
| #13 | TB · Redraft rank 22 | vs. CLE | 78% | +18 pts | 21 | +1.8 | 11.0 |
| #14 | WAS · Redraft rank 94 | vs. DAL | 52% | +12 pts | 13 | +5.8 | 11.3 |
| #15 | LAC · Redraft rank 73 | vs. LV | 63% | +5 pts | 25 | +8.0 | 16.5 |
| #16 | LAR · Redraft rank 75 | vs. NYG | 45% | +18 pts | 13 | +1.5 | 9.7 |
| #17 | CIN · Redraft rank 28 | vs. HOU | 70% | +7 pts | 25 | +4.5 | 9.7 |
| #18 | CLE · Redraft rank 62 | vs. TB | 67% | +13 pts | 17 | +1.8 | 7.3 |
| #19 | NYJ · Redraft rank 46 | vs. GB | 65% | +9 pts | 21 | +2.5 | 11.7 |
| #20 | DET · Redraft rank 1 | vs. BUF | 83% | +8 pts | 24 | -0.5 | 20.3 |
| #21 | ARI · Redraft rank 78 | vs. SEA | 64% | +21 pts | 7 | -6.8 | 2.9 |
| #22 | HOU · Redraft rank 87 | vs. CIN | 52% | +16 pts | 8 | -4.0 | 3.4 |
| #23 | NYG · Redraft rank 66 | vs. LAR | 59% | +6 pts | 16 | -0.5 | 7.5 |
| #24 | HOU · Redraft rank 95 | vs. CIN | 48% | +1 pts | 14 | +1.0 | 6.0 |
| #25 | NYJ · Redraft rank 80 | vs. GB | 31% | +5 pts | 6 | -0.5 | 8.0 |
| #26 | LV · Redraft rank 31 | vs. LAC | 81% | -5 pts | 28 | +2.0 | 8.3 |
| #27 | LAC · Redraft rank 184 | vs. LV | 25% | +1 pts | 6 | -0.5 | 4.4 |
| #28 | TEN · Redraft rank 49 | vs. PHI | 55% | +0 pts | 15 | -1.8 | 7.0 |
| #29 | WAS · Redraft rank 158 | vs. DAL | 37% | -5 pts | 13 | +0.8 | 5.3 |
| #30 | CHI · Redraft rank 93 | vs. MIN | 34% | -9 pts | 12 | +1.0 | 6.8 |
| #31 | LV · Redraft rank 109 | vs. LAC | 19% | +0 pts | 4 | -3.0 | 0.7 |
| #32 | GB · Redraft rank 192 | vs. NYJ | 27% | -2 pts | 8 | -2.5 | 7.6 |
| #33 | SEA · Redraft rank 89 | vs. ARI | 34% | -14 pts | 15 | +3.0 | 4.5 |
| #34 | ARI · Redraft rank 58 | vs. SEA | 40% | -3 pts | 12 | -3.0 | 6.0 |
| #35 | NO · Redraft rank 111 | vs. BAL | 29% | -18 pts | 15 | +3.3 | 4.7 |
| #36 | BAL · Redraft rank 24 | vs. NO | 53% | -5 pts | 19 | -6.0 | 16.2 |
| #37 | LAR · Redraft rank 16 | vs. NYG | 55% | -12 pts | 14 | -5.0 | 14.7 |
| #38 | DEN · Redraft rank 130 | vs. JAX | 34% | -14 pts | 10 | -5.0 | 3.6 |
| #39 | NO · Redraft rank 77 | vs. BAL | 54% | -10 pts | 10 | -8.5 | 6.1 |
| #40 | SF · Redraft rank 125 | vs. MIA | 33% | -10 pts | 7 | -8.0 | 2.5 |
| #41 | KC · Redraft rank 136 | vs. IND | 18% | -18 pts | 4 | -6.0 | 4.5 |
| #42 | TB · Redraft rank 156 | vs. CLE | 35% | -24 pts | 6 | -5.8 | 3.0 |
| #43 | JAX · Redraft rank 142 | vs. DEN | 22% | -22 pts | 6 | -6.3 | 1.3 |
| #44 | ATL · Redraft rank 3 | vs. CAR | 51% | -26 pts | 20 | -6.5 | 9.6 |
| #45 | SF · Redraft rank 8 | vs. MIA | 52% | -25 pts | 14 | -8.8 | 20.6 |
| #46 | PIT · Redraft rank 90 | vs. NE | 26% | -32 pts | 9 | -4.5 | 5.4 |
| #47 | NE · Redraft rank 52 | vs. PIT | 36% | -30 pts | 8 | -6.3 | 3.1 |
| #48 | PHI · Redraft rank 40 | vs. TEN | 16% | -55 pts | 6 | -15.0 | 2.5 |
A dash means the player did not have enough prior games for a comparison. Opportunity is attempts plus carries for quarterbacks, carries plus targets for running backs, and targets for receivers and tight ends.
Read the role
Volume can move before fantasy points do.
More snaps and opportunities can reveal an expanding role, while a one-week touchdown total can hide a shrinking one.
Use this report with matchup and availability context. It is not a projection or a start/sit ranking.