Free. No login. No nonsense.
Week 2 · updated Oct 6, 2026

Week 2 wide receivers usage report.

Christian Watson leads this week's role-trend ranking after playing 90% of offensive snaps and recording 11 targets.

Players are ordered by the combination of snap-share change, opportunity change, and total involvement. The comparison uses each player's previous four recorded games when available.

RankPlayerMatchupSnap shareSnap changeTargetsOpportunity changeHalf PPR
#1
GB · Redraft rank 36
vs. NYJ90%+30 pts11+4.812.1
#2
PHI · Redraft rank 38
vs. TEN88%+18 pts13+7.322.7
#3
BUF · Redraft rank 182
vs. DET74%+23 pts6+3.39.3
#4
TB · Redraft rank 78
vs. CLE86%+21 pts5+1.08.8
#5
NYJ · Redraft rank 155
vs. GB82%+10 pts12+6.89.3
#6
GB · Redraft rank 58
vs. NYJ86%+20 pts6+1.37.8
#7
PHI · Redraft rank 123
vs. TEN62%+17 pts6+3.89.9
#8
JAX · Redraft rank 33
vs. DEN81%+13 pts12+3.313.3
#9
IND · Redraft rank 88
vs. KC83%+10 pts9+3.510.7
#10
SEA · Redraft rank 176
vs. ARI56%+10 pts6+4.55.4
#11
LAR · Redraft rank 39
vs. NYG65%+11 pts10+3.535.5
#12
KC · Redraft rank 128
vs. IND86%+9 pts7+3.011.0
#13
NYJ · Redraft rank 27
vs. GB88%+15 pts7+0.014.2
#14
MIN · Redraft rank 100
vs. CHI88%+8 pts5+2.83.1
#15
LAC · Redraft rank 187
vs. LV82%+16 pts3-1.55.8
#16
PIT · Redraft rank 77
vs. NE97%+10 pts9+0.54.7
#17
ARI · Redraft rank 110
vs. SEA74%+18 pts1-2.50.0
#18
CIN · Redraft rank 35
vs. HOU72%+3 pts10+4.312.0
#19
CHI · Redraft rank 97
vs. MIN84%+13 pts4-2.05.8
#20
LAC · Redraft rank 153
vs. LV81%+9 pts5-0.51.9
#21
TB · Redraft rank 131
vs. CLE86%+11 pts3-1.87.3
#22
CLE · Redraft rank 81
vs. TB93%+1 pts7+3.018.0
#23
ARI · Redraft rank 48
vs. SEA94%+6 pts7+0.02.8
#24
MIN · Redraft rank 13
vs. CHI100%+10 pts6-2.37.0
#25
WAS · Redraft rank 179
vs. DAL49%+12 pts3-1.03.9
#26
DEN · Redraft rank 53
vs. JAX61%-3 pts10+5.817.8
#27
DET · Redraft rank 8
vs. BUF95%+4 pts13+0.330.7
#28
DAL · Redraft rank 7
vs. WAS75%+0 pts9+2.531.3
#29
DAL · Redraft rank 32
vs. WAS76%+0 pts8+2.37.0
#30
NE · Redraft rank 129
vs. PIT67%+4 pts4+0.311.1
#31
MIA · Redraft rank 134
vs. SF73%+2 pts5+1.06.7
#32
DET · Redraft rank 71
vs. BUF97%+8 pts4-3.34.3
#33
CAR · Redraft rank 30
vs. ATL80%-5 pts10+3.012.6
#34
CIN · Redraft rank 6
vs. HOU88%-2 pts9+0.523.0
#35
CAR · Redraft rank 76
vs. ATL76%-6 pts9+3.310.6
#36
JAX · Redraft rank 108
vs. DEN90%+9 pts1-5.33.3
#37
CHI · Redraft rank 64
vs. MIN57%-1 pts7+0.84.7
#38
JAX · Redraft rank 115
vs. DEN54%-7 pts8+3.55.5
#39
CLE · Redraft rank 107
vs. TB66%-3 pts6+1.05.2
#40
NYG · Redraft rank 29
vs. LAR74%+5 pts4-4.00.6
#41
DEN · Redraft rank 194
vs. JAX66%+7 pts1-4.81.6
#42
WAS · Redraft rank 82
vs. DAL70%-11 pts9+4.36.0
#43
NO · Redraft rank 15
vs. BAL84%-1 pts10-2.318.6
#44
PHI · Redraft rank 127
vs. TEN63%-1 pts1-3.01.4
#45
WAS · Redraft rank 91
vs. DAL51%-4 pts6-1.019.2
#46
KC · Redraft rank 50
vs. IND79%-5 pts6-2.310.3
#47
IND · Redraft rank 156
vs. KC51%-5 pts5-1.81.0
#48
MIA · Redraft rank 195
vs. SF86%-5 pts3-4.02.9
#49
SF · Redraft rank 85
vs. MIA60%-9 pts4-1.05.0
#50
TEN · Redraft rank 72
vs. PHI75%-13 pts5-1.04.2

A dash means the player did not have enough prior games for a comparison. Opportunity is attempts plus carries for quarterbacks, carries plus targets for running backs, and targets for receivers and tight ends.

Read the role

Volume can move before fantasy points do.

More snaps and opportunities can reveal an expanding role, while a one-week touchdown total can hide a shrinking one.

Use this report with matchup and availability context. It is not a projection or a start/sit ranking.

Quarterbacks →Running backs →Tight ends →