Free. No login. No nonsense.
Week 2 · updated Nov 7, 2026

Week 2 wide receivers usage report.

Christian Watson leads this week's role-trend ranking after playing 90% of offensive snaps and recording 11 targets.

Players are ordered by the combination of snap-share change, opportunity change, and total involvement. The comparison uses each player's previous four recorded games when available.

RankPlayerMatchupSnap shareSnap changeTargetsOpportunity changeHalf PPR
#1
GB · Redraft rank 25
vs. NYJ90%+30 pts11+4.812.1
#2
PHI · Redraft rank 64
vs. TEN88%+18 pts13+7.322.7
#3
BUF · Redraft rank 159
vs. DET74%+23 pts6+3.39.3
#4
TB · Redraft rank 72
vs. CLE86%+21 pts5+1.08.8
#5
NYJ · Redraft rank 123
vs. GB82%+10 pts12+6.89.3
#6
GB · Redraft rank 33
vs. NYJ86%+20 pts6+1.37.8
#7
JAX · Redraft rank 38
vs. DEN81%+13 pts12+3.313.3
#8
IND · Redraft rank 108
vs. KC83%+10 pts9+3.510.7
#9
SEA · Redraft rank 187
vs. ARI56%+10 pts6+4.55.4
#10
LAR · Redraft rank 88
vs. NYG65%+11 pts10+3.535.5
#11
KC · Redraft rank 139
vs. IND86%+9 pts7+3.011.0
#12
NYJ · Redraft rank 39
vs. GB88%+15 pts7+0.014.2
#13
MIN · Redraft rank 126
vs. CHI88%+8 pts5+2.83.1
#14
PIT · Redraft rank 98
vs. NE97%+10 pts9+0.54.7
#15
NYG · Redraft rank 190
vs. LAR81%+9 pts6+2.04.0
#16
ARI · Redraft rank 129
vs. SEA74%+18 pts1-2.50.0
#17
CIN · Redraft rank 17
vs. HOU72%+3 pts10+4.312.0
#18
CHI · Redraft rank 85
vs. MIN84%+13 pts4-2.05.8
#19
TB · Redraft rank 143
vs. CLE86%+11 pts3-1.87.3
#20
CLE · Redraft rank 100
vs. TB93%+1 pts7+3.018.0
#21
ARI · Redraft rank 63
vs. SEA94%+6 pts7+0.02.8
#22
MIN · Redraft rank 19
vs. CHI100%+10 pts6-2.37.0
#23
WAS · Redraft rank 117
vs. DAL49%+12 pts3-1.03.9
#24
DEN · Redraft rank 76
vs. JAX61%-3 pts10+5.817.8
#25
DET · Redraft rank 9
vs. BUF95%+4 pts13+0.330.7
#26
DAL · Redraft rank 7
vs. WAS75%+0 pts9+2.531.3
#27
DAL · Redraft rank 44
vs. WAS76%+0 pts8+2.37.0
#28
NE · Redraft rank 185
vs. PIT67%+4 pts4+0.311.1
#29
MIA · Redraft rank 120
vs. SF73%+2 pts5+1.06.7
#30
DET · Redraft rank 48
vs. BUF97%+8 pts4-3.34.3
#31
CAR · Redraft rank 42
vs. ATL80%-5 pts10+3.012.6
#32
CIN · Redraft rank 6
vs. HOU88%-2 pts9+0.523.0
#33
PIT · Redraft rank 124
vs. NE79%—8—5.5
#34
CAR · Redraft rank 83
vs. ATL76%-6 pts9+3.310.6
#35
JAX · Redraft rank 140
vs. DEN90%+9 pts1-5.33.3
#36
CHI · Redraft rank 37
vs. MIN57%-1 pts7+0.84.7
#37
JAX · Redraft rank 152
vs. DEN54%-7 pts8+3.55.5
#38
CLE · Redraft rank 103
vs. TB66%-3 pts6+1.05.2
#39
NYG · Redraft rank 15
vs. LAR74%+5 pts4-4.00.6
#40
NO · Redraft rank 27
vs. BAL84%-1 pts10-2.318.6
#41
PHI · Redraft rank 113
vs. TEN63%-1 pts1-3.01.4
#42
WAS · Redraft rank 82
vs. DAL51%-4 pts6-1.019.2
#43
KC · Redraft rank 41
vs. IND79%-5 pts6-2.310.3
#44
IND · Redraft rank 115
vs. KC51%-5 pts5-1.81.0
#45
MIA · Redraft rank 134
vs. SF86%-5 pts3-4.02.9
#46
SF · Redraft rank 105
vs. MIA60%-9 pts4-1.05.0
#47
TEN · Redraft rank 65
vs. PHI75%-13 pts5-1.04.2
#48
BUF · Redraft rank 119
vs. DET49%-13 pts6+0.35.3
#49
DEN · Redraft rank 161
vs. JAX73%-9 pts4-3.34.0
#50
MIA · Redraft rank 193
vs. SF41%-11 pts1-1.00.0

A dash means the player did not have enough prior games for a comparison. Opportunity is attempts plus carries for quarterbacks, carries plus targets for running backs, and targets for receivers and tight ends.

Read the role

Volume can move before fantasy points do.

More snaps and opportunities can reveal an expanding role, while a one-week touchdown total can hide a shrinking one.

Use this report with matchup and availability context. It is not a projection or a start/sit ranking.

Quarterbacks →Running backs →Tight ends →