Standard vs. PPR player values with context.
Standard leagues award zero points per reception; Full PPR awards one. The value difference depends on reception volume relative to the replacement player at each position—not catches alone.
The scoring context behind the list.
Removing reception points reduces raw scoring for pass catchers, but the market effect is positional. A receiver with fewer catches can gain relative value if the replacement WR loses even more, while a high-volume receiving back may lose an advantage that Full PPR rewards.
Zero fantasy points are awarded for each reception.
One point per reception anchors the published market adjustment.
Receiving yards still score 0.1 per yard and receiving touchdowns still score six.
The model compares each player’s loss with replacement at the same position.
Top RB/WR/TE assets
4-point passing TD · Standard · 12 teams · 1 FLEX
| Rank | Player | Base | League value | Change | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jahmyr GibbsRB · DET | 991 | 963 | -28 | 1.16 points/game less over replacement |
| 2 | Bijan RobinsonRB · ATL | 994 | 960 | -34 | 1.37 points/game less over replacement |
| 3 | Ja'Marr ChaseWR · CIN | 984 | 909 | -75 | 3.10 points/game less over replacement |
| 4 | Jaxon Smith-NjigbaWR · SEA | 895 | 856 | -39 | 1.78 points/game less over replacement |
| 5 | Puka NacuaWR · LAR | 848 | 783 | -65 | 3.14 points/game less over replacement |
| 6 | Brock BowersTE · LV | 779 | 742 | -37 | 1.76 points/game less over replacement |
| 7 | Ashton JeantyRB · LV | 726 | 718 | -8 | 0.47 points/game less over replacement |
| 8 | Amon-Ra St. BrownWR · DET | 758 | 710 | -48 | 2.58 points/game less over replacement |
| 9 | Justin JeffersonWR · MIN | 710 | 689 | -21 | 1.22 points/game less over replacement |
| 10 | Malik NabersWR · NYG | 695 | 675 | -20 | 1.59 points/game less over replacement |
| 11 | CeeDee LambWR · DAL | 672 | 642 | -30 | 1.83 points/game less over replacement |
| 12 | Trey McBrideTE · ARI | 688 | 636 | -52 | 2.83 points/game less over replacement |
| 13 | Omarion HamptonRB · LAC | 635 | 628 | -7 | 0.79 points/game less over replacement |
| 14 | Drake LondonWR · ATL | 633 | 615 | -18 | 1.16 points/game less over replacement |
| 15 | De'Von AchaneRB · MIA | 626 | 606 | -20 | 1.26 points/game less over replacement |
| 16 | Jonathan TaylorRB · IND | 571 | 580 | +9 | 0.61 points/game more over replacement |
| 17 | Colston LovelandTE · CHI | 570 | 576 | +6 | 0.39 points/game more over replacement |
| 18 | James CookRB · BUF | 558 | 568 | +10 | 0.70 points/game more over replacement |
| 19 | Tetairoa McMillanWR · CAR | 559 | 562 | +3 | 0.24 points/game more over replacement |
| 20 | Emeka EgbukaWR · TB | 552 | 561 | +9 | 0.65 points/game more over replacement |
| 21 | George PickensWR · DAL | 539 | 533 | -6 | 0.45 points/game less over replacement |
| 22 | Tyler WarrenTE · IND | 535 | 529 | -6 | 0.45 points/game less over replacement |
| 23 | Kenneth WalkerRB · KC | 490 | 493 | +3 | 0.22 points/game more over replacement |
| 24 | Chris OlaveWR · NO | 487 | 474 | -13 | 1.09 points/game less over replacement |
Biggest fallers
How to read these values.
What does PPR mean?
PPR means points per reception. Full PPR awards one point for every catch, Half PPR awards 0.5, and Standard awards zero.
Do wide receivers always lose value in Standard scoring?
Not equally. Reception-heavy players generally lose more raw points, but relative trade value depends on how their change compares with the replacement WR.
Which running backs are helped by Standard scoring?
Backs whose value comes more from rushing yards and touchdowns than catch volume can improve relative to receiving-dependent alternatives.
Does Standard scoring change receiving yards or touchdowns?
No. Only reception points change in this comparison; yardage and touchdown rules stay fixed.
Change FLEX spots, starters, format, or scoring in the lab.
Values use market release ftt-20260813T064417Z, updated August 13, 2026. Market source: Tradyr public API. Scoring adjustments are deterministic and documented in the published methodology.