Free. No login. No nonsense.
Week 4 · updated Oct 7, 2026

Week 4 wide receivers usage report.

CeeDee Lamb leads this week's role-trend ranking after playing 86% of offensive snaps and recording 21 targets.

Players are ordered by the combination of snap-share change, opportunity change, and total involvement. The comparison uses each player's previous four recorded games when available.

RankPlayerMatchupSnap shareSnap changeTargetsOpportunity changeHalf PPR
#1
DAL · Redraft rank 6
vs. HOU86%+15 pts21+14.532.8
#2
WAS · Redraft rank 183
vs. IND69%+27 pts8+4.33.6
#3
LAR · Redraft rank 38
vs. PHI95%+33 pts9-0.55.2
#4
PHI · Redraft rank 138
vs. LAR92%+30 pts5+1.03.3
#5
MIA · Redraft rank 192
vs. MIN82%+27 pts3-0.30.0
#6
BAL · Redraft rank 23
vs. TEN73%+16 pts10+4.321.8
#7
CLE · Redraft rank 111
vs. PIT92%+18 pts8+1.38.9
#8
BUF · Redraft rank 156
vs. NE78%+15 pts7+3.820.6
#9
TB · Redraft rank 127
vs. GB89%+13 pts7+4.06.1
#10
CAR · Redraft rank 29
vs. DET89%+3 pts16+8.838.2
#11
NYJ · Redraft rank 25
vs. CHI100%+26 pts4-3.54.2
#12
CHI · Redraft rank 93
vs. NYJ89%+15 pts7+2.312.4
#13
NYG · Redraft rank 28
vs. ARI76%+17 pts7+1.520.2
#14
LAR · Redraft rank 8
vs. PHI90%+17 pts12+0.523.2
#15
BUF · Redraft rank 142
vs. NE76%+13 pts8+2.59.7
#16
TB · Redraft rank 74
vs. GB94%+18 pts4-1.82.3
#17
WAS · Redraft rank 95
vs. IND66%+11 pts9+2.86.0
#18
LAC · Redraft rank 169
vs. SEA93%+15 pts5-0.57.5
#19
DET · Redraft rank 80
vs. CAR99%+9 pts8+1.813.2
#20
CIN · Redraft rank 34
vs. JAX79%-2 pts16+8.021.2
#21
PHI · Redraft rank 143
vs. LAR74%+8 pts6+3.04.2
#22
TEN · Redraft rank 60
vs. BAL84%+0 pts12+5.317.0
#23
ARI · Redraft rank 40
vs. NYG94%+3 pts13+3.313.0
#24
NE · Redraft rank 115
vs. BUF64%+1 pts9+5.520.8
#25
JAX · Redraft rank 120
vs. CIN62%+16 pts2-2.38.7
#26
DEN · Redraft rank 53
vs. SF68%+10 pts6+0.812.0
#27
MIN · Redraft rank 107
vs. MIA96%+5 pts6+1.37.1
#28
CLE · Redraft rank 89
vs. PIT95%+4 pts7+2.010.9
#29
SF · Redraft rank 91
vs. DEN67%+5 pts6+2.015.5
#30
PIT · Redraft rank 79
vs. CLE97%+3 pts9+0.814.0
#31
DAL · Redraft rank 39
vs. HOU86%+14 pts3-4.08.5
#32
DET · Redraft rank 10
vs. CAR96%+7 pts11-1.511.5
#33
SF · Redraft rank 59
vs. DEN59%0 pts8+3.510.1
#34
SEA · Redraft rank 182
vs. LAC60%+6 pts3-0.311.8
#35
JAX · Redraft rank 114
vs. CIN82%+3 pts4-0.34.8
#36
MIA · Redraft rank 130
vs. MIN87%+5 pts5-1.89.5
#37
ATL · Redraft rank 22
vs. NO89%+2 pts6-0.812.1
#38
NO · Redraft rank 15
vs. ATL86%0 pts12+0.315.6
#39
ARI · Redraft rank 113
vs. NYG65%-1 pts4+1.57.7
#40
LV · Redraft rank 149
vs. KC67%-4 pts8+2.86.4
#41
GB · Redraft rank 57
vs. TB88%+1 pts7-1.310.2
#42
KC · Redraft rank 121
vs. LV75%-6 pts7+2.59.0
#43
HOU · Redraft rank 24
vs. DAL69%-4 pts8+1.327.3
#44
SEA · Redraft rank 3
vs. LAC88%+6 pts6-5.010.1
#45
DEN · Redraft rank 133
vs. SF73%-6 pts6+1.50.9
#46
JAX · Redraft rank 43
vs. CIN80%+6 pts3-5.01.5
#47
IND · Redraft rank 110
vs. WAS77%+1 pts4-3.03.1
#48
TEN · Redraft rank 132
vs. BAL67%-1 pts5-3.09.5
#49
CHI · Redraft rank 58
vs. NYJ56%-7 pts6-0.89.4
#50
PIT · Redraft rank 157
vs. CLE72%-12 pts4+0.32.5

A dash means the player did not have enough prior games for a comparison. Opportunity is attempts plus carries for quarterbacks, carries plus targets for running backs, and targets for receivers and tight ends.

Read the role

Volume can move before fantasy points do.

More snaps and opportunities can reveal an expanding role, while a one-week touchdown total can hide a shrinking one.

Use this report with matchup and availability context. It is not a projection or a start/sit ranking.

Quarterbacks →Running backs →Tight ends →