Week 4 · updated Oct 7, 2026
Week 4 running backs usage report.
Braelon Allen leads this week's role-trend ranking after playing 94% of offensive snaps and recording 16 carries + targets.
Players are ordered by the combination of snap-share change, opportunity change, and total involvement. The comparison uses each player's previous four recorded games when available.
| Rank | Player | Matchup | Snap share | Snap change | Carries + targets | Opportunity change | Half PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | NYJ · Redraft rank 126 | vs. CHI | 94% | +61 pts | 16 | +9.0 | 7.7 |
| #2 | CHI · Redraft rank 67 | vs. NYJ | 54% | +17 pts | 31 | +20.8 | 27.5 |
| #3 | PIT · Redraft rank 37 | vs. CLE | 97% | +38 pts | 23 | +5.3 | 14.1 |
| #4 | LAR · Redraft rank 19 | vs. PHI | 83% | +20 pts | 29 | +12.3 | 31.7 |
| #5 | CAR · Redraft rank 26 | vs. DET | 84% | +18 pts | 22 | +7.8 | 25.4 |
| #6 | GB · Redraft rank 146 | vs. TB | 55% | +28 pts | 12 | +3.0 | 7.4 |
| #7 | PHI · Redraft rank 181 | vs. LAR | 48% | +21 pts | 15 | +6.5 | 5.5 |
| #8 | LAC · Redraft rank 129 | vs. SEA | 37% | +10 pts | 16 | +10.3 | 8.8 |
| #9 | JAX · Redraft rank 31 | vs. CIN | 59% | +15 pts | 19 | +5.8 | 10.1 |
| #10 | CLE · Redraft rank 48 | vs. PIT | 66% | +10 pts | 24 | +7.8 | 18.6 |
| #11 | DAL · Redraft rank 21 | vs. HOU | 74% | +10 pts | 24 | +6.5 | 28.8 |
| #12 | ATL · Redraft rank 105 | vs. NO | 42% | +13 pts | 15 | +6.5 | 25.2 |
| #13 | NE · Redraft rank 65 | vs. BUF | 66% | +11 pts | 18 | +5.3 | 16.9 |
| #14 | MIN · Redraft rank 55 | vs. MIA | 73% | +5 pts | 28 | +7.8 | 14.8 |
| #15 | NYG · Redraft rank 47 | vs. ARI | 64% | +10 pts | 19 | +3.3 | 7.1 |
| #16 | CIN · Redraft rank 20 | vs. JAX | 79% | +12 pts | 20 | -0.3 | 13.6 |
| #17 | SF · Redraft rank 9 | vs. DEN | 74% | +5 pts | 20 | +3.3 | 14.5 |
| #18 | LV · Redraft rank 159 | vs. KC | 21% | +3 pts | 11 | +5.7 | 2.2 |
| #19 | TEN · Redraft rank 82 | vs. BAL | 53% | -3 pts | 20 | +4.5 | 12.0 |
| #20 | ARI · Redraft rank 122 | vs. NYG | 55% | +6 pts | 10 | -0.3 | 11.9 |
| #21 | BAL · Redraft rank 11 | vs. TEN | 62% | +1 pts | 25 | +2.0 | 14.9 |
| #22 | KC · Redraft rank 4 | vs. LV | 75% | +9 pts | 23 | -2.8 | 30.4 |
| #23 | DET · Redraft rank 1 | vs. CAR | 87% | +13 pts | 22 | -5.5 | 15.7 |
| #24 | NO · Redraft rank 92 | vs. ATL | 38% | +4 pts | 14 | +0.3 | 20.3 |
| #25 | BUF · Redraft rank 12 | vs. NE | 59% | +5 pts | 14 | -3.0 | 15.3 |
| #26 | HOU · Redraft rank 62 | vs. DAL | 56% | +5 pts | 10 | -3.3 | 4.3 |
| #27 | DEN · Redraft rank 77 | vs. SF | 44% | -8 pts | 17 | +3.3 | 14.3 |
| #28 | IND · Redraft rank 5 | vs. WAS | 71% | -9 pts | 24 | +0.8 | 22.2 |
| #29 | WAS · Redraft rank 104 | vs. IND | 45% | +0 pts | 13 | -2.8 | 6.0 |
| #30 | NE · Redraft rank 70 | vs. BUF | 37% | -10 pts | 16 | +1.8 | 4.2 |
| #31 | HOU · Redraft rank 118 | vs. DAL | 44% | -1 pts | 7 | -3.8 | 8.2 |
| #32 | ARI · Redraft rank 27 | vs. NYG | 45% | -4 pts | 15 | -2.7 | 6.0 |
| #33 | SF · Redraft rank 145 | vs. DEN | 26% | -4 pts | 6 | -3.0 | 1.3 |
| #34 | TB · Redraft rank 44 | vs. GB | 59% | -5 pts | 16 | -4.8 | 6.1 |
| #35 | TB · Redraft rank 150 | vs. GB | 43% | -5 pts | 5 | -3.5 | 9.7 |
| #36 | KC · Redraft rank 153 | vs. LV | 27% | +0 pts | 1 | -5.7 | 1.5 |
| #37 | JAX · Redraft rank 177 | vs. CIN | 25% | -6 pts | 6 | -3.3 | 9.5 |
| #38 | DEN · Redraft rank 117 | vs. SF | 32% | -12 pts | 13 | -1.0 | 6.2 |
| #39 | ATL · Redraft rank 2 | vs. NO | 60% | -11 pts | 21 | -4.0 | 27.2 |
| #40 | TEN · Redraft rank 180 | vs. BAL | 36% | -9 pts | 3 | -4.3 | 1.1 |
| #41 | LV · Redraft rank 13 | vs. KC | 67% | -17 pts | 23 | -4.5 | 15.6 |
| #42 | LAR · Redraft rank 108 | vs. PHI | 15% | -17 pts | 7 | -4.8 | 2.6 |
| #43 | CHI · Redraft rank 33 | vs. NYJ | 35% | -28 pts | 17 | -1.8 | 6.4 |
| #44 | LAC · Redraft rank 45 | vs. SEA | 35% | -26 pts | 11 | -7.8 | 12.3 |
| #45 | PHI · Redraft rank 32 | vs. LAR | 7% | -53 pts | 3 | -11.8 | 1.5 |
A dash means the player did not have enough prior games for a comparison. Opportunity is attempts plus carries for quarterbacks, carries plus targets for running backs, and targets for receivers and tight ends.
Read the role
Volume can move before fantasy points do.
More snaps and opportunities can reveal an expanding role, while a one-week touchdown total can hide a shrinking one.
Use this report with matchup and availability context. It is not a projection or a start/sit ranking.