Free. No login. No nonsense.
Week 6 · updated Oct 20, 2026

Week 6 wide receivers usage report.

Omar Cooper leads this week's role-trend ranking after playing 82% of offensive snaps and recording 7 targets.

Players are ordered by the combination of snap-share change, opportunity change, and total involvement. The comparison uses each player's previous four recorded games when available.

RankPlayerMatchupSnap shareSnap changeTargetsOpportunity changeHalf PPR
#1
NYJ · Redraft rank 181
vs. NE82%+75 pts7+6.019.3
#2
PIT · Redraft rank 103
vs. TB94%+35 pts12+7.020.2
#3
BAL · Redraft rank 21
vs. CLE88%+34 pts11+3.39.7
#4
DAL · Redraft rank 10
vs. GB88%+13 pts18+7.311.5
#5
SEA · Redraft rank 3
vs. DEN92%+11 pts16+6.319.4
#6
BUF · Redraft rank 129
vs. LV85%+17 pts6+1.813.9
#7
ATL · Redraft rank 22
vs. CHI100%+14 pts10+2.010.2
#8
TB · Redraft rank 131
vs. PIT92%+11 pts8+3.85.7
#9
TB · Redraft rank 58
vs. PIT86%+0 pts16+9.314.3
#10
IND · Redraft rank 118
vs. TEN71%+12 pts11+3.812.2
#11
NYG · Redraft rank 17
vs. NO86%+6 pts15+5.822.5
#12
PIT · Redraft rank 75
vs. TB95%0 pts15+8.314.8
#13
CLE · Redraft rank 112
vs. BAL81%+16 pts6+0.05.9
#14
BAL · Redraft rank 160
vs. CLE54%+14 pts5+2.06.0
#15
CAR · Redraft rank 54
vs. PHI75%+3 pts13+5.812.7
#16
PHI · Redraft rank 147
vs. CAR81%+9 pts6+1.53.4
#17
GB · Redraft rank 40
vs. DAL84%+1 pts13+5.019.4
#18
NE · Redraft rank 39
vs. NYJ76%+3 pts10+3.84.2
#19
DAL · Redraft rank 36
vs. GB88%+4 pts11+2.310.3
#20
IND · Redraft rank 119
vs. TEN86%+8 pts8+0.56.7
#21
GB · Redraft rank 24
vs. DAL88%+8 pts8+0.07.9
#22
WAS · Redraft rank 172
vs. SF67%+10 pts4-0.56.5
#23
KC · Redraft rank 113
vs. LAC84%+4 pts7+1.510.8
#24
LV · Redraft rank 120
vs. BUF70%+6 pts7+1.024.2
#25
CHI · Redraft rank 96
vs. ATL96%+7 pts4-2.55.4
#26
PHI · Redraft rank 47
vs. CAR66%-8 pts14+6.317.0
#27
JAX · Redraft rank 137
vs. HOU75%-9 pts10+6.010.8
#28
NYJ · Redraft rank 29
vs. NE98%+4 pts6-2.86.4
#29
JAX · Redraft rank 31
vs. HOU73%-8 pts11+3.88.4
#30
CLE · Redraft rank 87
vs. BAL92%+0 pts5-1.32.0
#31
SEA · Redraft rank 184
vs. DEN46%-6 pts8+4.09.3
#32
LAR · Redraft rank 5
vs. ARI90%+12 pts7-7.011.0
#33
HOU · Redraft rank 195
vs. JAX49%+1 pts4+0.318.7
#34
WAS · Redraft rank 84
vs. SF61%+1 pts7-0.813.4
#35
HOU · Redraft rank 23
vs. JAX73%+3 pts5-2.39.4
#36
DEN · Redraft rank 79
vs. SEA65%-2 pts7+0.04.4
#37
TEN · Redraft rank 122
vs. IND59%-6 pts7+1.03.7
#38
DEN · Redraft rank 156
vs. SEA77%-2 pts3-2.02.9
#39
ARI · Redraft rank 57
vs. LAR92%+1 pts7-4.05.2
#40
BUF · Redraft rank 128
vs. LV60%-7 pts6+1.011.4
#41
TEN · Redraft rank 71
vs. IND74%-7 pts7-0.816.0
#42
CAR · Redraft rank 32
vs. PHI76%-10 pts9-0.811.6
#43
LAR · Redraft rank 52
vs. ARI74%-5 pts4-5.85.4
#44
SF · Redraft rank 50
vs. WAS40%-12 pts5-1.810.9
#45
PHI · Redraft rank 162
vs. CAR62%-20 pts4-2.03.4
#46
CHI · Redraft rank 55
vs. ATL39%-24 pts8+0.513.5
#47
NO · Redraft rank 20
vs. NYG58%-28 pts7-3.312.3
#48
JAX · Redraft rank 136
vs. HOU21%-30 pts2-1.50.0
#49
LAC · Redraft rank 81
vs. KC12%-42 pts1-3.32.2
#50
HOU · Redraft rank 97
vs. JAX19%-55 pts4+0.84.9

A dash means the player did not have enough prior games for a comparison. Opportunity is attempts plus carries for quarterbacks, carries plus targets for running backs, and targets for receivers and tight ends.

Read the role

Volume can move before fantasy points do.

More snaps and opportunities can reveal an expanding role, while a one-week touchdown total can hide a shrinking one.

Use this report with matchup and availability context. It is not a projection or a start/sit ranking.

Quarterbacks →Running backs →Tight ends →