Free. No login. No nonsense.
Week 6 · updated Oct 20, 2026

Week 6 tight ends usage report.

Kyle Pitts leads this week's role-trend ranking after playing 78% of offensive snaps and recording 7 targets.

Players are ordered by the combination of snap-share change, opportunity change, and total involvement. The comparison uses each player's previous four recorded games when available.

RankPlayerMatchupSnap shareSnap changeTargetsOpportunity changeHalf PPR
#1
ATL · Redraft rank 109
vs. CHI78%+24 pts7+3.520.5
#2
NYG · Redraft rank 46
vs. NO91%+16 pts11+1.020.9
#3
PHI · Redraft rank 102
vs. CAR81%+14 pts8+2.59.1
#4
LV · Redraft rank 14
vs. BUF98%+16 pts9-0.89.0
#5
SF · Redraft rank 48
vs. WAS89%+10 pts8+2.315.4
#6
BUF · Redraft rank 99
vs. LV72%+6 pts8+4.37.3
#7
CHI · Redraft rank 78
vs. ATL88%+4 pts7+1.815.5
#8
LV · Redraft rank 178
vs. BUF79%-2 pts9+4.513.0
#9
NE · Redraft rank 144
vs. NYJ76%+4 pts5+1.012.8
#10
ARI · Redraft rank 18
vs. LAR97%+5 pts9-1.88.8
#11
BAL · Redraft rank 141
vs. CLE72%+9 pts3-3.00.9
#12
PIT · Redraft rank 142
vs. TB72%+5 pts3-2.32.1
#13
JAX · Redraft rank 114
vs. HOU76%-6 pts7+1.36.9
#14
GB · Redraft rank 69
vs. DAL77%-9 pts8+2.36.2
#15
CLE · Redraft rank 116
vs. BAL89%+1 pts3-3.01.4
#16
KC · Redraft rank 76
vs. LAC66%-13 pts5-0.57.3
#17
NO · Redraft rank 107
vs. NYG58%-6 pts2-4.30.0
#18
NYJ · Redraft rank 161
vs. NE35%-10 pts3-1.51.7
#19
DAL · Redraft rank 159
vs. GB54%-17 pts3-1.82.3
#20
HOU · Redraft rank 179
vs. JAX40%-20 pts6+0.35.3

A dash means the player did not have enough prior games for a comparison. Opportunity is attempts plus carries for quarterbacks, carries plus targets for running backs, and targets for receivers and tight ends.

Read the role

Volume can move before fantasy points do.

More snaps and opportunities can reveal an expanding role, while a one-week touchdown total can hide a shrinking one.

Use this report with matchup and availability context. It is not a projection or a start/sit ranking.

Quarterbacks →Running backs →Wide receivers →