Free. No login. No nonsense.
Week 1 · updated Nov 2, 2026

Week 1 wide receivers usage report.

Dontayvion Wicks leads this week's role-trend ranking after playing 91% of offensive snaps and recording 4 targets.

Players are ordered by the combination of snap-share change, opportunity change, and total involvement. The comparison uses each player's previous four recorded games when available.

RankPlayerMatchupSnap shareSnap changeTargetsOpportunity changeHalf PPR
#1
PHI · Redraft rank 189
vs. WAS91%+56 pts4+1.014.3
#2
MIA · Redraft rank 147
vs. LV98%+37 pts8+5.84.8
#3
GB · Redraft rank 40
vs. MIN82%+27 pts12+9.312.5
#4
PHI · Redraft rank 59
vs. WAS95%+36 pts6+1.36.8
#5
TB · Redraft rank 66
vs. CIN86%+27 pts6+1.88.8
#6
GB · Redraft rank 24
vs. MIN76%+14 pts8+2.829.7
#7
PIT · Redraft rank 88
vs. ATL96%+12 pts10+2.86.0
#8
IND · Redraft rank 121
vs. BAL89%+20 pts4-1.84.7
#9
WAS · Redraft rank 74
vs. PHI63%+11 pts9+3.313.5
#10
CAR · Redraft rank 72
vs. CHI84%+6 pts9+4.529.8
#11
ARI · Redraft rank 113
vs. LAC79%+20 pts3-2.83.8
#12
IND · Redraft rank 131
vs. BAL67%+17 pts6-1.06.2
#13
CHI · Redraft rank 45
vs. CAR73%+16 pts5-1.57.0
#14
DAL · Redraft rank 39
vs. NYG84%+7 pts6+0.34.3
#15
TB · Redraft rank 123
vs. CIN86%+9 pts4-1.06.3
#16
MIN · Redraft rank 128
vs. GB83%+7 pts2-0.30.0
#17
DAL · Redraft rank 6
vs. NYG81%+5 pts8+1.012.9
#18
ATL · Redraft rank 21
vs. PIT98%+10 pts4-2.84.5
#19
SF · Redraft rank 47
vs. LAR75%+7 pts7-0.513.9
#20
NO · Redraft rank 22
vs. DET86%-1 pts13+2.823.2
#21
DEN · Redraft rank 85
vs. KC75%+10 pts3-2.30.7
#22
KC · Redraft rank 129
vs. DEN77%+0 pts6+2.53.3
#23
MIN · Redraft rank 19
vs. GB92%+1 pts9+1.027.2
#24
HOU · Redraft rank 29
vs. BUF72%-4 pts10+3.817.7
#25
SEA · Redraft rank 2
vs. NE90%+0 pts11+0.522.2
#26
CLE · Redraft rank 104
vs. JAX92%—4—12.9
#27
MIA · Redraft rank 132
vs. LV91%—7—11.9
#28
TEN · Redraft rank 70
vs. NYJ88%—6—5.8
#29
CAR · Redraft rank 37
vs. CHI82%-4 pts8+2.08.0
#30
CIN · Redraft rank 26
vs. TB72%+2 pts6-1.07.4
#31
DET · Redraft rank 8
vs. NO90%-3 pts14+0.323.7
#32
CLE · Redraft rank 95
vs. JAX69%—5—5.8
#33
PHI · Redraft rank 105
vs. WAS64%—4—1.0
#34
DET · Redraft rank 67
vs. NO84%-7 pts9+1.56.5
#35
PIT · Redraft rank 183
vs. ATL88%-2 pts3-1.37.3
#36
BAL · Redraft rank 146
vs. IND40%—3—1.6
#37
ARI · Redraft rank 60
vs. LAC85%-3 pts7-1.08.1
#38
WAS · Redraft rank 133
vs. PHI37%—4—14.4
#39
NYJ · Redraft rank 35
vs. TEN75%-4 pts7-0.310.9
#40
LAR · Redraft rank 4
vs. SF70%+1 pts9-3.09.9
#41
NYJ · Redraft rank 83
vs. TEN7%—1—3.5
#42
BUF · Redraft rank 55
vs. HOU76%-14 pts8+3.318.5
#43
JAX · Redraft rank 33
vs. CLE61%-3 pts6-2.016.8
#44
BUF · Redraft rank 126
vs. HOU53%-8 pts6+1.07.0
#45
CIN · Redraft rank 7
vs. TB94%+4 pts4-7.52.2
#46
LAR · Redraft rank 77
vs. SF54%-6 pts6-1.04.1
#47
KC · Redraft rank 50
vs. DEN83%+4 pts2-8.88.9
#48
BUF · Redraft rank 134
vs. HOU50%-4 pts1-3.50.6
#49
NYJ · Redraft rank 185
vs. TEN69%-6 pts3-3.87.5
#50
NE · Redraft rank 192
vs. SEA56%-13 pts3-0.50.0

A dash means the player did not have enough prior games for a comparison. Opportunity is attempts plus carries for quarterbacks, carries plus targets for running backs, and targets for receivers and tight ends.

Read the role

Volume can move before fantasy points do.

More snaps and opportunities can reveal an expanding role, while a one-week touchdown total can hide a shrinking one.

Use this report with matchup and availability context. It is not a projection or a start/sit ranking.

Quarterbacks →Running backs →Tight ends →