Half PPR running back rankings.
Current dynasty running back values for Half PPR leagues. The model measures how each back’s reception adjustment compares with the same-position replacement option.
The scoring context behind the list.
Half PPR adds 0.5 points per reception to the Standard scoring reference. Running backs with different rushing and receiving profiles therefore move by different amounts, even when their overall market prices begin close together.
Each reception adds 0.5 fantasy points.
Zero points per reception is the model's neutral scoring reference.
The selected RB is measured against replacement at the same position.
Smaller or older production samples produce smaller adjustments.
Top RB assets
4-point passing TD · Half PPR · 12 teams · 1 FLEX
| Rank | Player | Base | League value | Change | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jahmyr Gibbs | 992 | 1000 | +8 | 1.33 points/game more over replacement |
| 2 | Bijan Robinson | 974 | 1000 | +26 | 1.44 points/game more over replacement |
| 3 | Kenneth Walker | 711 | 723 | +12 | 0.65 points/game more over replacement |
| 4 | Ashton Jeanty | 602 | 618 | +16 | 0.99 points/game more over replacement |
| 5 | Jonathan Taylor | 603 | 610 | +7 | 0.45 points/game more over replacement |
| 6 | James Cook | 572 | 578 | +6 | 0.41 points/game more over replacement |
| 7 | Christian McCaffrey | 476 | 501 | +25 | 2.01 points/game more over replacement |
| 8 | Kyren Williams | 494 | 500 | +6 | 0.48 points/game more over replacement |
| 9 | De'Von Achane | 469 | 486 | +17 | 1.39 points/game more over replacement |
| 10 | Breece Hall | 442 | 452 | +10 | 0.88 points/game more over replacement |
| 11 | Bucky Irving | 427 | 436 | +9 | 0.83 points/game more over replacement |
| 12 | Bhayshul Tuten | 437 | 434 | -3 | 0.29 points/game less over replacement |
| 13 | Javonte Williams | 425 | 432 | +7 | 0.66 points/game more over replacement |
| 14 | Chase Brown | 406 | 417 | +11 | 1.07 points/game more over replacement |
| 15 | Derrick Henry | 414 | 413 | -1 | 0.09 points/game less over replacement |
| 16 | Omarion Hampton | 394 | 400 | +6 | 1.15 points/game more over replacement |
| 17 | D'Andre Swift | 388 | 393 | +5 | 0.51 points/game more over replacement |
| 18 | Chuba Hubbard | 379 | 384 | +5 | 0.53 points/game more over replacement |
| 19 | Quinshon Judkins | 372 | 374 | +2 | 0.24 points/game more over replacement |
| 20 | Jaylen Warren | 347 | 352 | +5 | 0.63 points/game more over replacement |
| 21 | Saquon Barkley | 345 | 350 | +5 | 0.54 points/game more over replacement |
| 22 | TreVeyon Henderson | 321 | 324 | +3 | 0.41 points/game more over replacement |
| 23 | Josh Jacobs | 300 | 304 | +4 | 0.57 points/game more over replacement |
| 24 | Cam Skattebo | 288 | 291 | +3 | 0.88 points/game more over replacement |
Biggest fallers
How to read these values.
Who are the best running backs in Half PPR dynasty?
The live ranking above combines the current dynasty market with Half PPR production over replacement. It updates when a validated market release is published.
Is Half PPR better for rushing running backs?
It reduces the advantage created by reception volume, but the relative result still depends on how each back compares with replacement.
How different is Half PPR from Full PPR?
Every catch is worth half a point less. The market effect varies with reception volume, replacement production, confidence, and the adjustment cap.
Does FLEX depth change these values?
Yes. Additional FLEX demand can deepen replacement across RB, WR, and TE. Use the lab to match your exact lineup.
Change FLEX spots, starters, format, or scoring in the lab.
Values use market release ftt-20261025T231550Z, updated October 25, 2026. Market source: Tradyr public API. Scoring adjustments are deterministic and documented in the published methodology.

























