Scoring research // Half PPR running backs
Half PPR running back rankings.
Current dynasty running back values for Half PPR leagues. The model measures how each back’s reception adjustment compares with the same-position replacement option.
Half PPR scoring4-point passing TDs12 teams · 1 FLEXRelease ftt-20260910T232215Z
What changes
The scoring context behind the list.
Half PPR keeps receiving work meaningful without granting the full point used by the market baseline. Running backs with different rushing and receiving profiles therefore move by different amounts, even when their overall market prices begin close together.
Half PPR
Each reception adds 0.5 fantasy points.
Full PPR anchor
The published market begins from one point per reception.
Backfield comparison
The selected RB is measured against replacement at the same position.
Confidence weighting
Smaller or older production samples produce smaller adjustments.
Current values
Top RB assets
4-point passing TD · Half PPR · 12 teams · 1 FLEX
| Rank | Player | Base | League value | Change | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jahmyr Gibbs RB · DET | 971 | 948 | -23 | 0.82 points/game less over replacement |
| 2 | Bijan Robinson RB · ATL | 950 | 925 | -25 | 0.92 points/game less over replacement |
| 3 | Ashton Jeanty RB · LV | 606 | 598 | -8 | 0.47 points/game less over replacement |
| 4 | Omarion Hampton RB · LAC | 580 | 574 | -6 | 0.63 points/game less over replacement |
| 5 | De'Von Achane RB · MIA | 567 | 553 | -14 | 0.87 points/game less over replacement |
| 6 | Jonathan Taylor RB · IND | 544 | 545 | +1 | 0.07 points/game more over replacement |
| 7 | James Cook RB · BUF | 538 | 540 | +2 | 0.11 points/game more over replacement |
| 8 | Christian McCaffrey RB · SF | 448 | 429 | -19 | 1.49 points/game less over replacement |
| 9 | Kenneth Walker RB · KC | 429 | 427 | -2 | 0.13 points/game less over replacement |
| 10 | Chase Brown RB · CIN | 430 | 423 | -7 | 0.55 points/game less over replacement |
| 11 | Saquon Barkley RB · PHI | 403 | 403 | 0 | 0.03 points/game less over replacement |
| 12 | Breece Hall RB · NYJ | 361 | 357 | -4 | 0.36 points/game less over replacement |
| 13 | Kyren Williams RB · LAR | 343 | 343 | 0 | 0.04 points/game more over replacement |
| 14 | Quinshon Judkins RB · CLE | 329 | 331 | +2 | 0.28 points/game more over replacement |
| 15 | Javonte Williams RB · DAL | 327 | 326 | -1 | 0.14 points/game less over replacement |
| 16 | Derrick Henry RB · BAL | 303 | 308 | +5 | 0.60 points/game more over replacement |
| 17 | Bucky Irving RB · TB | 299 | 296 | -3 | 0.32 points/game less over replacement |
| 18 | Travis Etienne RB · NO | 297 | 296 | -1 | 0.09 points/game less over replacement |
| 19 | Cam Skattebo RB · NYG | 297 | 296 | -1 | 0.36 points/game less over replacement |
| 20 | TreVeyon Henderson RB · NE | 295 | 296 | +1 | 0.11 points/game more over replacement |
| 21 | D'Andre Swift RB · CHI | 250 | 250 | 0 | 0.00 points/game more over replacement |
| 22 | Bhayshul Tuten RB · JAX | 238 | 243 | +5 | 0.81 points/game more over replacement |
| 23 | David Montgomery RB · HOU | 230 | 232 | +2 | 0.29 points/game more over replacement |
| 24 | Josh Jacobs RB · GB | 213 | 213 | 0 | 0.05 points/game less over replacement |
Biggest fallers
How to read these values.
Who are the best running backs in Half PPR dynasty?
The live ranking above combines the current dynasty market with Half PPR production over replacement. It updates when a validated market release is published.
Is Half PPR better for rushing running backs?
It reduces the advantage created by reception volume, but the relative result still depends on how each back compares with replacement.
How different is Half PPR from Full PPR?
Every catch is worth half a point less. The market effect varies with reception volume, replacement production, confidence, and the adjustment cap.
Does FLEX depth change these values?
Yes. Additional FLEX demand can deepen replacement across RB, WR, and TE. Use the lab to match your exact lineup.
Use your exact lineup
Open impact lab →Change FLEX spots, starters, format, or scoring in the lab.
Values use market release ftt-20260910T232215Z, updated September 10, 2026. Market source: Tradyr public API. Scoring adjustments are deterministic and documented in the published methodology.