Dynasty Superflex baseline
Tucker Kraft
GB · TE5 · age 25.8
412#60 overall
Head-to-head // TERelease ftt-20260813T064417Z
Tucker Kraft vs. Harold Fannin
The short answer
Tucker Kraft and Harold Fannin are in the same current dynasty Superflex tier: 412 versus 393, a 4.6% gap.
This tight end tier can look different when extra TE receptions are rewarded. The comparison quantifies that change on the same composite scale and shows whether it is large enough to alter the trade decision.
Open complete Tucker Kraft file →
Dynasty Superflex baseline
Harold Fannin
CLE · TE6 · age 22.1
393#70 overall
Same players // four markets
What changes in Superflex, 1QB, TEP, and redraft?
These rows change one major market context at a time. Hover or focus the dotted labels for a plain-language definition. Values share one 0–1,000 composite scale.
| League setting | Tucker Kraft | Harold Fannin | Current answer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dynasty Superflex ⓘTwo QB-eligible starting slots; 4-point passing TDs and full PPR. | 412 | 393 | Same tier |
| Dynasty 1QB ⓘOne starting quarterback; 4-point passing TDs and full PPR. | 445 | 426 | Same tier |
| Superflex TEP ⓘSuperflex with an additional tight end reception premium. | 448 | 428 | Same tier |
| Redraft 1QB ⓘCurrent-season value only; one quarterback and full PPR. | 201 | 73 | Tucker Kraft +128 |
Format verdict // The same player leads all four markets, but the gap ranges from 19 to 128 points. Format still changes the price.
Reception scoring // player-level
Does standard, half PPR, or full PPR change it?
PPR means points per reception: zero in standard, 0.5 in half PPR, and one in full PPR. Each adjustment is measured relative to a same-position replacement player.
| League setting | Tucker Kraft | Harold Fannin | Current answer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard ⓘReceptions score zero points; yards and touchdowns still score normally. | 420 | 388 | Tucker Kraft +32 |
| Half PPR ⓘEach reception scores 0.5 points. | 414 | 389 | Tucker Kraft +25 |
| Full PPR ⓘEach reception scores one point. | 412 | 393 | Same tier |
Scoring verdict: No leader flip appears in the displayed scoring settings. The gap ranges from 19 to 32 value points, so scoring can still change the price.
Observed production // 2025
The evidence underneath the market answer.
These are descriptive season results, not projections. Missing upstream fields remain visibly unavailable instead of being guessed.
Tucker Kraft
TE5- Fantasy points/game
- 6.9
- Consistency grade
- A+
- Targets/game
- 2.6
- Receptions/game
- 1.9
- Receiving yards/game
- 28.8
- Catch rate
- 72.7%
Harold Fannin
TE6- Fantasy points/game
- 11.7
- Consistency grade
- A+
- Targets/game
- 6.7
- Receptions/game
- 4.5
- Receiving yards/game
- 45.7
- Catch rate
- 67.3%
Decision rule
Treat the gap like a tiebreaker.
If TEP changes the leader, use that league-specific answer; if it does not, keep the baseline market as the primary signal.
Yes, the current baseline supports treating Tucker Kraft and Harold Fannin as straight-up trade peers. A manager can still prefer either side, but the model does not support a large automatic add. Injury status, starting-lineup need, and manager-specific preference are outside this model.
Direct answers
Comparison FAQ
Who is worth more in dynasty: Tucker Kraft or Harold Fannin?
Tucker Kraft and Harold Fannin are in the same current dynasty Superflex tier: 412 versus 393, a 4.6% gap.
Should I trade Tucker Kraft for Harold Fannin straight up?
Yes, the current baseline supports treating Tucker Kraft and Harold Fannin as straight-up trade peers. A manager can still prefer either side, but the model does not support a large automatic add.
Does scoring change the Tucker Kraft vs. Harold Fannin comparison?
No leader flip appears in the displayed scoring settings. The gap ranges from 19 to 32 value points, so scoring can still change the price.
Why do Superflex and 1QB values differ?
Superflex makes starting quarterbacks scarcer, while 1QB pushes replacement closer to the starters. The displayed format gap ranges from 19 to 128 value points.
Same-position decisions