Dynasty Superflex baseline
Sam LaPorta
DET · TE7 · age 25.6
382#74 overall
Head-to-head // TERelease ftt-20260813T064417Z
Sam LaPorta vs. Kyle Pitts
The short answer
Sam LaPorta and Kyle Pitts are in the same current dynasty Superflex tier: 382 versus 368, a 3.7% gap.
This comparison stress-tests a tight end trade across dynasty, redraft, ordinary PPR, and TE premium. It is designed to show when familiar player names sit inside the same current value tier.
Open complete Sam LaPorta file →
Dynasty Superflex baseline
Kyle Pitts
ATL · TE8 · age 25.9
368#78 overall
Same players // four markets
What changes in Superflex, 1QB, TEP, and redraft?
These rows change one major market context at a time. Hover or focus the dotted labels for a plain-language definition. Values share one 0–1,000 composite scale.
| League setting | Sam LaPorta | Kyle Pitts | Current answer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dynasty Superflex ⓘTwo QB-eligible starting slots; 4-point passing TDs and full PPR. | 382 | 368 | Same tier |
| Dynasty 1QB ⓘOne starting quarterback; 4-point passing TDs and full PPR. | 410 | 399 | Same tier |
| Superflex TEP ⓘSuperflex with an additional tight end reception premium. | 417 | 402 | Same tier |
| Redraft 1QB ⓘCurrent-season value only; one quarterback and full PPR. | 171 | 145 | Sam LaPorta +26 |
Format verdict // The same player leads all four markets, but the gap ranges from 11 to 26 points. Format still changes the price.
Reception scoring // player-level
Does standard, half PPR, or full PPR change it?
PPR means points per reception: zero in standard, 0.5 in half PPR, and one in full PPR. Each adjustment is measured relative to a same-position replacement player.
| League setting | Sam LaPorta | Kyle Pitts | Current answer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard ⓘReceptions score zero points; yards and touchdowns still score normally. | 379 | 367 | Same tier |
| Half PPR ⓘEach reception scores 0.5 points. | 379 | 366 | Same tier |
| Full PPR ⓘEach reception scores one point. | 382 | 368 | Same tier |
Scoring verdict: No leader flip appears in the displayed scoring settings. The gap ranges from 12 to 14 value points, so scoring can still change the price.
Observed production // 2025
The evidence underneath the market answer.
These are descriptive season results, not projections. Missing upstream fields remain visibly unavailable instead of being guessed.
Sam LaPorta
TE7- Fantasy points/game
- 6.3
- Consistency grade
- C
- Targets/game
- 2.9
- Receptions/game
- 2.4
- Receiving yards/game
- 28.8
- Catch rate
- 81.6%
Kyle Pitts
TE8- Fantasy points/game
- 12.4
- Consistency grade
- C
- Targets/game
- 6.9
- Receptions/game
- 5.2
- Receiving yards/game
- 54.6
- Catch rate
- 74.6%
Decision rule
Treat the gap like a tiebreaker.
Require the market table to show a real gap before adding value to either side of a one-for-one proposal.
Yes, the current baseline supports treating Sam LaPorta and Kyle Pitts as straight-up trade peers. A manager can still prefer either side, but the model does not support a large automatic add. Injury status, starting-lineup need, and manager-specific preference are outside this model.
Direct answers
Comparison FAQ
Who is worth more in dynasty: Sam LaPorta or Kyle Pitts?
Sam LaPorta and Kyle Pitts are in the same current dynasty Superflex tier: 382 versus 368, a 3.7% gap.
Should I trade Sam LaPorta for Kyle Pitts straight up?
Yes, the current baseline supports treating Sam LaPorta and Kyle Pitts as straight-up trade peers. A manager can still prefer either side, but the model does not support a large automatic add.
Does scoring change the Sam LaPorta vs. Kyle Pitts comparison?
No leader flip appears in the displayed scoring settings. The gap ranges from 12 to 14 value points, so scoring can still change the price.
Why do Superflex and 1QB values differ?
Superflex makes starting quarterbacks scarcer, while 1QB pushes replacement closer to the starters. The displayed format gap ranges from 11 to 26 value points.
Same-position decisions