Dynasty Superflex baseline
Joe Burrow
CIN · QB5 · age 29.8
670#12 overall
Head-to-head // QBRelease ftt-20260913T165752Z
Joe Burrow or Lamar Jackson: who has more dynasty value?
The short answer
Lamar Jackson is currently worth more than Joe Burrow in dynasty Superflex: 757 versus 670, a 11.5% gap.
This elite-quarterback decision is exactly where passing-touchdown scoring can matter without erasing the market anchor. The page measures six-point passing production against replacement and keeps 1QB, Superflex, dynasty, and redraft prices visible as separate questions.
Dynasty Superflex baseline
Lamar Jackson
BAL · QB3 · age 29.7
757#8 overall
Same players // four markets
What changes in Superflex, 1QB, TEP, and redraft?
These rows change one major market context at a time. Hover or focus the dotted labels for a plain-language definition. Values share one 0–1,000 composite scale.
| League setting | Joe Burrow | Lamar Jackson | Current answer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dynasty Superflex ⓘTwo QB-eligible starting slots; 4-point passing TDs and Standard scoring. | 670 | 757 | Lamar Jackson +87 |
| Dynasty 1QB ⓘOne starting quarterback; 4-point passing TDs and Standard scoring. | 333 | 377 | Lamar Jackson +44 |
| Superflex TEP ⓘSuperflex with an additional tight end reception premium. | 670 | 757 | Lamar Jackson +87 |
| Redraft 1QB ⓘCurrent-season value only; one quarterback and Standard scoring. | 283 | 423 | Lamar Jackson +140 |
Format verdict // The same player leads all four markets, but the gap ranges from 44 to 140 points. Format still changes the price.
Passing TD scoring // player-level
Does 4-point vs. 6-point passing TD scoring change it?
The added passing-TD points are calculated from each player’s observed rate, then measured against a replacement quarterback. It is not a generic multiplier.
| League setting | Joe Burrow | Lamar Jackson | Current answer |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-point passing TD ⓘEach passing touchdown scores four points; Standard scoring remains on. | 670 | 757 | Lamar Jackson +87 |
| 6-point passing TD ⓘEach passing touchdown scores six points; Standard scoring remains on. | 726 | 801 | Lamar Jackson +75 |
Scoring verdict: No leader flip appears in the displayed scoring settings. The gap ranges from 75 to 87 value points, so scoring can still change the price.
Observed production // 2025
The evidence underneath the market answer.
These are descriptive season results, not projections. Missing upstream fields remain visibly unavailable instead of being guessed.
Joe Burrow
QB5- Fantasy points/game
- 8.2
- Consistency grade
- B
- Pass yards/game
- 106.4
- Pass TD/game
- 1
- Rush yards/game
- 2.4
- Completion rate
- 66.8%
Lamar Jackson
QB3- Fantasy points/game
- 17.1
- Consistency grade
- B
- Pass yards/game
- 196.1
- Pass TD/game
- 1.6
- Rush yards/game
- 26.8
- Completion rate
- 63.6%
Decision rule
Start with Lamar Jackson's edge.
Start with the row matching your quarterback demand, then use the six-point result as a measured adjustment—not permission to add a major asset automatically.
Not at the baseline price. Lamar Jackson holds the larger current value, so a straight swap gives up a 11.5% market edge before roster fit is considered. Injury status, starting-lineup need, and manager-specific preference are outside this model.
Direct answers
Comparison FAQ
Who is worth more in dynasty: Joe Burrow or Lamar Jackson?
Lamar Jackson is currently worth more than Joe Burrow in dynasty Superflex: 757 versus 670, a 11.5% gap.
Should I trade Joe Burrow for Lamar Jackson straight up?
Not at the baseline price. Lamar Jackson holds the larger current value, so a straight swap gives up a 11.5% market edge before roster fit is considered.
Does scoring change the Joe Burrow vs. Lamar Jackson comparison?
No leader flip appears in the displayed scoring settings. The gap ranges from 75 to 87 value points, so scoring can still change the price.
Why do Superflex and 1QB values differ?
Superflex makes starting quarterbacks scarcer, while 1QB pushes replacement closer to the starters. The displayed format gap ranges from 44 to 140 value points.
Same-position decisions