Dynasty Superflex baseline
Lamar Jackson
BAL · QB4 · age 29.6
728#11 overall
Head-to-head // QBRelease ftt-20260813T064417Z
Lamar Jackson vs. Caleb Williams
The short answer
Lamar Jackson and Caleb Williams are in the same current dynasty Superflex tier: 728 versus 745, a 2.3% gap.
This comparison separates current market strength from long-horizon quarterback preference. Because both sides are quarterbacks, the format rows expose how much of the price is created by Superflex scarcity rather than a universal player gap.
Open complete Lamar Jackson file →
Dynasty Superflex baseline
Caleb Williams
CHI · QB3 · age 24.8
745#10 overall
Same players // four markets
What changes in Superflex, 1QB, TEP, and redraft?
These rows change one major market context at a time. Hover or focus the dotted labels for a plain-language definition. Values share one 0–1,000 composite scale.
| League setting | Lamar Jackson | Caleb Williams | Current answer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dynasty Superflex ⓘTwo QB-eligible starting slots; 4-point passing TDs and full PPR. | 728 | 745 | Same tier |
| Dynasty 1QB ⓘOne starting quarterback; 4-point passing TDs and full PPR. | 511 | 487 | Same tier |
| Superflex TEP ⓘSuperflex with an additional tight end reception premium. | 728 | 745 | Same tier |
| Redraft 1QB ⓘCurrent-season value only; one quarterback and full PPR. | 355 | 237 | Lamar Jackson +118 |
Format verdict // The leader changes across formats. There is no defensible format-free winner; use the row that matches your league.
Passing TD scoring // player-level
Does 4-point vs. 6-point passing TD scoring change it?
The added passing-TD points are calculated from each player’s observed rate, then measured against a replacement quarterback. It is not a generic multiplier.
| League setting | Lamar Jackson | Caleb Williams | Current answer |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-point passing TD ⓘEach passing touchdown scores four points; full PPR remains on. | 728 | 745 | Same tier |
| 6-point passing TD ⓘEach passing touchdown scores six points; full PPR remains on. | 770 | 765 | Same tier |
Scoring verdict: Yes. The higher-valued side changes across the displayed scoring settings, so this league setting can change the answer.
Observed production // 2025
The evidence underneath the market answer.
These are descriptive season results, not projections. Missing upstream fields remain visibly unavailable instead of being guessed.
Lamar Jackson
QB4- Fantasy points/game
- 17.1
- Consistency grade
- B
- Pass yards/game
- 196.1
- Pass TD/game
- 1.6
- Rush yards/game
- 26.8
- Completion rate
- 63.6%
Caleb Williams
QB3- Fantasy points/game
- 19.1
- Consistency grade
- A
- Pass yards/game
- 231.9
- Pass TD/game
- 1.6
- Rush yards/game
- 22.5
- Completion rate
- 58.1%
Decision rule
Treat the gap like a tiebreaker.
Treat a narrow result as a roster-window choice; require a meaningful add before crossing a clear value tier.
Yes, the current baseline supports treating Lamar Jackson and Caleb Williams as straight-up trade peers. A manager can still prefer either side, but the model does not support a large automatic add. Injury status, starting-lineup need, and manager-specific preference are outside this model.
Direct answers
Comparison FAQ
Who is worth more in dynasty: Lamar Jackson or Caleb Williams?
Lamar Jackson and Caleb Williams are in the same current dynasty Superflex tier: 728 versus 745, a 2.3% gap.
Should I trade Lamar Jackson for Caleb Williams straight up?
Yes, the current baseline supports treating Lamar Jackson and Caleb Williams as straight-up trade peers. A manager can still prefer either side, but the model does not support a large automatic add.
Does scoring change the Lamar Jackson vs. Caleb Williams comparison?
Yes. The higher-valued side changes across the displayed scoring settings, so this league setting can change the answer.
Why do Superflex and 1QB values differ?
Quarterback scarcity changes enough across the displayed formats to change which side leads. Use the row matching your league rather than the universal baseline.
Same-position decisions