Week 9 · updated Nov 15, 2026
Week 9 running backs usage report.
Tyler Allgeier leads this week's role-trend ranking after playing 96% of offensive snaps and recording 20 carries + targets.
Players are ordered by the combination of snap-share change, opportunity change, and total involvement. The comparison uses each player's previous four recorded games when available.
| Rank | Player | Matchup | Snap share | Snap change | Carries + targets | Opportunity change | Half PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | ARI · Redraft rank 100 | vs. SEA | 96% | +44 pts | 20 | +7.0 | 5.6 |
| #2 | DEN · Redraft rank 42 | vs. CAR | 77% | +37 pts | 21 | +11.0 | 16.8 |
| #3 | CLE · Redraft rank 135 | vs. NO | 64% | +26 pts | 14 | +6.3 | 6.3 |
| #4 | PHI · Redraft rank 45 | vs. NYG | 59% | +27 pts | 14 | +3.3 | 8.2 |
| #5 | GB · Redraft rank 150 | vs. NE | 39% | +18 pts | 14 | +8.3 | 12.8 |
| #6 | JAX · Redraft rank 133 | vs. BAL | 45% | +23 pts | 12 | +5.0 | 10.2 |
| #7 | BUF · Redraft rank 9 | vs. MIN | 64% | +4 pts | 32 | +9.8 | 16.7 |
| #8 | ATL · Redraft rank 4 | vs. CIN | 82% | +2 pts | 26 | +6.0 | 23.7 |
| #9 | SEA · Redraft rank 63 | vs. ARI | 57% | +6 pts | 18 | +2.0 | 9.1 |
| #10 | NO · Redraft rank 127 | vs. CLE | 49% | +12 pts | 10 | -0.8 | 6.4 |
| #11 | DAL · Redraft rank 19 | vs. IND | 72% | -2 pts | 25 | +5.3 | 20.4 |
| #12 | TB · Redraft rank 15 | vs. CHI | 69% | +7 pts | 25 | +0.3 | 26.5 |
| #13 | LV · Redraft rank 38 | vs. SF | 64% | +8 pts | 13 | -0.5 | 4.5 |
| #14 | KC · Redraft rank 126 | vs. NYJ | 30% | +4 pts | 6 | +2.0 | 9.4 |
| #15 | HOU · Redraft rank 106 | vs. LAC | 66% | -8 pts | 22 | +6.0 | 7.9 |
| #16 | CAR · Redraft rank 25 | vs. DEN | 89% | +6 pts | 21 | -2.5 | 11.6 |
| #17 | LAC · Redraft rank 80 | vs. HOU | 40% | +4 pts | 13 | +0.8 | 6.0 |
| #18 | LAR · Redraft rank 68 | vs. WAS | 36% | +3 pts | 13 | +0.5 | 11.8 |
| #19 | SF · Redraft rank 5 | vs. LV | 68% | -5 pts | 21 | +2.5 | 21.7 |
| #20 | WAS · Redraft rank 103 | vs. LAR | 56% | +1 pts | 10 | -0.8 | 7.9 |
| #21 | LAR · Redraft rank 21 | vs. WAS | 64% | -2 pts | 19 | +0.3 | 7.6 |
| #22 | SF · Redraft rank 130 | vs. LV | 25% | -3 pts | 11 | +2.0 | 7.0 |
| #23 | IND · Redraft rank 16 | vs. DAL | 69% | -1 pts | 18 | -1.5 | 6.9 |
| #24 | SEA · Redraft rank 87 | vs. ARI | 36% | -4 pts | 13 | +0.8 | 9.8 |
| #25 | TB · Redraft rank 142 | vs. CHI | 38% | +5 pts | 8 | -4.8 | 9.1 |
| #26 | MIN · Redraft rank 108 | vs. BUF | 48% | +4 pts | 9 | -4.5 | 5.2 |
| #27 | BAL · Redraft rank 26 | vs. JAX | 50% | -2 pts | 17 | -2.0 | 5.6 |
| #28 | LV · Redraft rank 140 | vs. SF | 34% | +2 pts | 6 | -5.0 | -0.3 |
| #29 | KC · Redraft rank 3 | vs. NYJ | 65% | -11 pts | 22 | -0.5 | 34.3 |
| #30 | NYJ · Redraft rank 41 | vs. KC | 43% | -12 pts | 19 | -0.5 | 10.2 |
| #31 | CHI · Redraft rank 28 | vs. TB | 72% | +2 pts | 13 | -9.8 | 3.1 |
| #32 | CIN · Redraft rank 35 | vs. ATL | 63% | -8 pts | 12 | -6.5 | 9.0 |
| #33 | NE · Redraft rank 75 | vs. GB | 60% | -9 pts | 10 | -5.8 | 13.3 |
| #34 | CLE · Redraft rank 73 | vs. NO | 34% | -19 pts | 16 | -2.3 | 5.0 |
| #35 | DET · Redraft rank 1 | vs. MIA | 68% | -13 pts | 21 | -7.8 | 13.4 |
| #36 | JAX · Redraft rank 27 | vs. BAL | 36% | -23 pts | 12 | -7.5 | 8.9 |
| #37 | DEN · Redraft rank 153 | vs. CAR | 15% | -22 pts | 5 | -8.3 | 2.7 |
| #38 | MIN · Redraft rank 88 | vs. BUF | 35% | -21 pts | 6 | -12.0 | 2.6 |
| #39 | NYJ · Redraft rank 105 | vs. KC | 59% | -24 pts | 10 | -13.5 | 4.4 |
| #40 | GB · Redraft rank 49 | vs. NE | 15% | -32 pts | 4 | -12.0 | 0.5 |
A dash means the player did not have enough prior games for a comparison. Opportunity is attempts plus carries for quarterbacks, carries plus targets for running backs, and targets for receivers and tight ends.
Read the role
Volume can move before fantasy points do.
More snaps and opportunities can reveal an expanding role, while a one-week touchdown total can hide a shrinking one.
Use this report with matchup and availability context. It is not a projection or a start/sit ranking.