Week 5 · updated Oct 20, 2026
Week 5 wide receivers usage report.
Germie Bernard leads this week's role-trend ranking after playing 92% of offensive snaps and recording 9 targets.
Players are ordered by the combination of snap-share change, opportunity change, and total involvement. The comparison uses each player's previous four recorded games when available.
| Rank | Player | Matchup | Snap share | Snap change | Targets | Opportunity change | Half PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | PIT · Redraft rank 103 | vs. IND | 92% | +43 pts | 9 | +5.3 | 11.4 |
| #2 | NYG · Redraft rank 17 | vs. WAS | 90% | +20 pts | 20 | +13.5 | 23.6 |
| #3 | LAR · Redraft rank 5 | vs. BUF | 85% | +9 pts | 24 | +13.5 | 29.2 |
| #4 | CHI · Redraft rank 96 | vs. GB | 99% | +22 pts | 9 | +4.0 | 3.5 |
| #5 | BAL · Redraft rank 21 | vs. ATL | 82% | +24 pts | 9 | +2.0 | 10.6 |
| #6 | ATL · Redraft rank 22 | vs. BAL | 98% | +13 pts | 11 | +4.8 | 15.3 |
| #7 | CIN · Redraft rank 9 | vs. MIA | 89% | +14 pts | 10 | +3.0 | 16.7 |
| #8 | MIN · Redraft rank 15 | vs. NO | 89% | +19 pts | 7 | +0.0 | 15.8 |
| #9 | PHI · Redraft rank 147 | vs. JAX | 81% | +13 pts | 7 | +3.3 | 6.8 |
| #10 | DAL · Redraft rank 36 | vs. TB | 88% | +5 pts | 13 | +6.0 | 23.5 |
| #11 | WAS · Redraft rank 172 | vs. NYG | 68% | +19 pts | 3 | -1.8 | 4.6 |
| #12 | NE · Redraft rank 143 | vs. LV | 83% | +18 pts | 3 | -2.0 | 2.1 |
| #13 | SF · Redraft rank 50 | vs. SEA | 63% | +8 pts | 10 | +4.0 | 22.8 |
| #14 | CHI · Redraft rank 55 | vs. GB | 77% | +15 pts | 6 | -1.3 | 6.9 |
| #15 | NYJ · Redraft rank 29 | vs. CLE | 93% | +4 pts | 11 | +3.3 | 19.9 |
| #16 | JAX · Redraft rank 31 | vs. PHI | 82% | +6 pts | 9 | +2.5 | 27.4 |
| #17 | TB · Redraft rank 58 | vs. DAL | 89% | +4 pts | 9 | +3.0 | 14.2 |
| #18 | TEN · Redraft rank 122 | vs. HOU | 75% | +9 pts | 7 | +1.3 | 8.3 |
| #19 | LV · Redraft rank 120 | vs. NE | 75% | +12 pts | 5 | -0.8 | 5.5 |
| #20 | PHI · Redraft rank 162 | vs. JAX | 84% | +1 pts | 8 | +3.0 | 8.8 |
| #21 | TB · Redraft rank 131 | vs. DAL | 88% | +7 pts | 3 | -1.5 | 5.5 |
| #22 | JAX · Redraft rank 137 | vs. PHI | 85% | +6 pts | 3 | -0.8 | 4.7 |
| #23 | IND · Redraft rank 119 | vs. PIT | 85% | +6 pts | 6 | -1.0 | 6.2 |
| #24 | CLE · Redraft rank 87 | vs. NYJ | 91% | -1 pts | 7 | +1.5 | 12.1 |
| #25 | BUF · Redraft rank 129 | vs. LAR | 70% | +7 pts | 2 | -2.0 | 7.2 |
| #26 | GB · Redraft rank 24 | vs. CHI | 80% | +2 pts | 8 | +0.0 | 29.3 |
| #27 | HOU · Redraft rank 195 | vs. TEN | 45% | +1 pts | 5 | +2.0 | 12.7 |
| #28 | JAX · Redraft rank 136 | vs. PHI | 51% | +4 pts | 3 | -0.5 | 0.0 |
| #29 | BUF · Redraft rank 128 | vs. LAR | 69% | +6 pts | 3 | -2.8 | 9.5 |
| #30 | DEN · Redraft rank 156 | vs. LAC | 81% | +4 pts | 3 | -2.5 | 8.8 |
| #31 | DET · Redraft rank 7 | vs. ARI | 86% | -3 pts | 11 | -0.5 | 9.9 |
| #32 | SEA · Redraft rank 3 | vs. SF | 84% | +1 pts | 8 | -2.5 | 20.3 |
| #33 | HOU · Redraft rank 23 | vs. TEN | 71% | -1 pts | 7 | -0.8 | 8.1 |
| #34 | MIA · Redraft rank 127 | vs. CIN | 80% | -6 pts | 8 | +1.0 | 9.1 |
| #35 | NO · Redraft rank 20 | vs. MIN | 91% | +6 pts | 6 | -6.0 | 6.6 |
| #36 | DET · Redraft rank 72 | vs. ARI | 89% | -2 pts | 4 | -2.3 | 17.7 |
| #37 | LAR · Redraft rank 52 | vs. BUF | 73% | -1 pts | 7 | -2.5 | 19.6 |
| #38 | DEN · Redraft rank 79 | vs. LAC | 65% | -4 pts | 5 | -1.5 | 3.8 |
| #39 | PIT · Redraft rank 75 | vs. IND | 92% | -4 pts | 4 | -4.3 | 3.8 |
| #40 | GB · Redraft rank 40 | vs. CHI | 77% | -7 pts | 7 | -2.3 | 17.3 |
| #41 | SEA · Redraft rank 184 | vs. SF | 46% | -11 pts | 4 | +0.3 | 3.3 |
| #42 | TEN · Redraft rank 71 | vs. HOU | 76% | -8 pts | 5 | -3.0 | 1.1 |
| #43 | ARI · Redraft rank 57 | vs. DET | 84% | -8 pts | 7 | -4.0 | 5.3 |
| #44 | IND · Redraft rank 118 | vs. PIT | 45% | -16 pts | 9 | +0.8 | 7.0 |
| #45 | CIN · Redraft rank 42 | vs. MIA | 69% | -10 pts | 4 | -5.8 | 3.2 |
| #46 | SF · Redraft rank 111 | vs. SEA | 43% | -18 pts | 3 | -1.3 | 1.5 |
| #47 | DAL · Redraft rank 10 | vs. TB | 57% | -24 pts | 5 | -6.5 | 1.9 |
| #48 | CLE · Redraft rank 112 | vs. NYJ | 16% | -62 pts | 1 | -6.0 | 1.0 |
A dash means the player did not have enough prior games for a comparison. Opportunity is attempts plus carries for quarterbacks, carries plus targets for running backs, and targets for receivers and tight ends.
Read the role
Volume can move before fantasy points do.
More snaps and opportunities can reveal an expanding role, while a one-week touchdown total can hide a shrinking one.
Use this report with matchup and availability context. It is not a projection or a start/sit ranking.