Scoring research // wide receivers
Standard scoring wide receiver rankings.
Rank dynasty wide receivers for Standard scoring. Reception points disappear, while receiving yards and touchdowns remain and each WR is compared with positional replacement.
Standard scoring4-point passing TDs12 teams · 1 FLEXRelease ftt-20260910T232215Z
What changes
The scoring context behind the list.
Target volume matters differently when a catch itself scores nothing. High-volume receivers may lose more raw points, but the trade-value result depends on whether they lose more or less than the replacement wide receiver in the same lineup.
Zero per catch
A reception adds no points before yardage and touchdowns.
Yardage retained
Every receiving yard continues to score 0.1 points.
WR replacement
Three dedicated WR starters plus FLEX demand establish the comparison line.
Market first
The scoring model adjusts the current market rather than replacing it.
Current values
Top WR assets
4-point passing TD · Standard · 12 teams · 1 FLEX
| Rank | Player | Base | League value | Change | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ja'Marr Chase WR · CIN | 907 | 819 | -88 | 4.04 points/game less over replacement |
| 2 | Jaxon Smith-Njigba WR · SEA | 839 | 784 | -55 | 2.71 points/game less over replacement |
| 3 | Puka Nacua WR · LAR | 806 | 727 | -79 | 4.07 points/game less over replacement |
| 4 | Amon-Ra St. Brown WR · DET | 698 | 639 | -59 | 3.52 points/game less over replacement |
| 5 | Justin Jefferson WR · MIN | 647 | 614 | -33 | 2.15 points/game less over replacement |
| 6 | Malik Nabers WR · NYG | 622 | 595 | -27 | 2.53 points/game less over replacement |
| 7 | CeeDee Lamb WR · DAL | 609 | 569 | -40 | 2.76 points/game less over replacement |
| 8 | Drake London WR · ATL | 489 | 465 | -24 | 2.09 points/game less over replacement |
| 9 | George PickensWR · DAL | 479 | 463 | -16 | 1.39 points/game less over replacement |
| 10 | Nico Collins WR · HOU | 433 | 416 | -17 | 1.69 points/game less over replacement |
| 11 | Tetairoa McMillan WR · CAR | 421 | 414 | -7 | 0.70 points/game less over replacement |
| 12 | Chris Olave WR · NO | 419 | 399 | -20 | 2.03 points/game less over replacement |
| 13 | Emeka Egbuka WR · TB | 396 | 393 | -3 | 0.28 points/game less over replacement |
| 14 | A.J. Brown WR · NE | 390 | 372 | -18 | 1.93 points/game less over replacement |
| 15 | Garrett Wilson WR · NYJ | 387 | 368 | -19 | 2.05 points/game less over replacement |
| 16 | Ladd McConkey WR · LAC | 378 | 368 | -10 | 1.06 points/game less over replacement |
| 17 | DeVonta Smith WR · PHI | 363 | 351 | -12 | 1.40 points/game less over replacement |
| 18 | Zay Flowers WR · BAL | 355 | 343 | -12 | 1.39 points/game less over replacement |
| 19 | Luther Burden WR · CHI | 341 | 343 | +2 | 0.29 points/game more over replacement |
| 20 | Jaylen Waddle WR · DEN | 338 | 332 | -6 | 0.72 points/game less over replacement |
| 21 | Rashee Rice WR · KC | 341 | 321 | -20 | 2.77 points/game less over replacement |
| 22 | Tee HigginsWR · CIN | 317 | 309 | -8 | 1.08 points/game less over replacement |
| 23 | Rome OdunzeWR · CHI | 298 | 298 | 0 | 0.07 points/game less over replacement |
| 24 | Marvin Harrison Jr WR · ARI | 296 | 295 | -1 | 0.08 points/game less over replacement |
Biggest fallers
How to read these values.
Which wide receivers are best in Standard scoring?
Receivers who preserve more value through yards and touchdowns can gain relative to catch-dependent alternatives. Use the table’s league value rather than reception totals alone.
Are slot receivers always worse in Standard leagues?
No. Role labels are not part of the formula. Recorded receptions, yards, touchdowns, replacement production, and confidence determine the adjustment.
Do receiving touchdowns score differently?
No. Receiving touchdowns remain six points. This page changes only points per reception from the Full PPR baseline.
Why does roster depth matter for receiver value?
More WR and FLEX starters push replacement deeper. A deeper replacement line can increase the advantage created by an elite receiver.
Use your exact lineup
Open impact lab →Change FLEX spots, starters, format, or scoring in the lab.
Values use market release ftt-20260910T232215Z, updated September 10, 2026. Market source: Tradyr public API. Scoring adjustments are deterministic and documented in the published methodology.