Biggest risers
No players move in this direction.
Scoring research // redraft wide receiver
Standard redraft wide receiver rankings.
Rank wide receivers for a 12-team redraft Standard league. Every value starts with the current market and changes only when the player’s scoring profile separates from same-position replacement.
Standard scoring4-point passing TDs12 teams · 1 FLEXRelease ftt-20260913T165752Z
What changes
The scoring context behind the list.
Standard Redraft Wide Receiver Rankings should answer a league-specific question, not paste a generic list under a new label. This board uses the redraft market, 12 teams, 1QB roster demand, Standard reception rules. The value change is measured against the replacement option at the same position, so the table shows where this exact setup produces a real difference.
Redraft market
Values price the current season rather than long-term age and resale value.
Standard
Receptions score zero points; receiving yards and touchdowns still count.
1QB
One starting quarterback keeps the replacement tier closer to the starters.
12-team league
Starter demand and exact rookie-pick availability are calculated for 12 teams rather than borrowed from a 12-team board.
wide receiver replacement
Each wide receiver is measured against the replacement option created by this lineup.
Current values
Top WR assets
4-point passing TD · Standard · 12 teams · 1 FLEX
| Rank | Player | Base | League value | Change | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ja'Marr Chase WR · CIN | 906 | 906 | 0 | 0.00 points/game the same over replacement |
| 2 | Puka Nacua WR · LAR | 867 | 867 | 0 | 0.00 points/game the same over replacement |
| 3 | Jaxon Smith-Njigba WR · SEA | 819 | 819 | 0 | 0.00 points/game the same over replacement |
| 4 | Amon-Ra St. Brown WR · DET | 779 | 779 | 0 | 0.00 points/game the same over replacement |
| 5 | CeeDee Lamb WR · DAL | 714 | 714 | 0 | 0.00 points/game the same over replacement |
| 6 | Justin Jefferson WR · MIN | 691 | 691 | 0 | 0.00 points/game the same over replacement |
| 7 | George PickensWR · DAL | 507 | 507 | 0 | 0.00 points/game the same over replacement |
| 8 | Nico Collins WR · HOU | 498 | 498 | 0 | 0.00 points/game the same over replacement |
| 9 | Malik Nabers WR · NYG | 486 | 486 | 0 | 0.00 points/game the same over replacement |
| 10 | Drake London WR · ATL | 468 | 468 | 0 | 0.00 points/game the same over replacement |
| 11 | Chris Olave WR · NO | 455 | 455 | 0 | 0.00 points/game the same over replacement |
| 12 | DeVonta Smith WR · PHI | 430 | 430 | 0 | 0.00 points/game the same over replacement |
| 13 | Rashee Rice WR · KC | 371 | 371 | 0 | 0.00 points/game the same over replacement |
| 14 | Zay Flowers WR · BAL | 369 | 369 | 0 | 0.00 points/game the same over replacement |
| 15 | Ladd McConkey WR · LAC | 367 | 367 | 0 | 0.00 points/game the same over replacement |
| 16 | Jaylen Waddle WR · DEN | 360 | 360 | 0 | 0.00 points/game the same over replacement |
| 17 | A.J. Brown WR · NE | 356 | 356 | 0 | 0.00 points/game the same over replacement |
| 18 | Emeka Egbuka WR · TB | 313 | 313 | 0 | 0.00 points/game the same over replacement |
| 19 | Garrett Wilson WR · NYJ | 310 | 310 | 0 | 0.00 points/game the same over replacement |
| 20 | Tee HigginsWR · CIN | 304 | 304 | 0 | 0.00 points/game the same over replacement |
| 21 | Tetairoa McMillan WR · CAR | 301 | 301 | 0 | 0.00 points/game the same over replacement |
| 22 | Davante AdamsWR · LAR | 253 | 253 | 0 | 0.00 points/game the same over replacement |
| 23 | Jameson WilliamsWR · DET | 238 | 238 | 0 | 0.00 points/game the same over replacement |
| 24 | Luther Burden WR · CHI | 227 | 227 | 0 | 0.00 points/game the same over replacement |
Biggest fallers
No players move in this direction.
How to read these values.
Who leads these standard redraft wide receiver rankings?
The live table above is the current answer. It combines the validated redraft market with Standard scoring over replacement and changes when a new market release is published.
How is this different from a generic redraft ranking?
The board uses Standard reception scoring, 1QB quarterback demand. Those settings can change both replacement and the price gap between players.
Are these weekly projections?
No. These are current trade values adjusted with recorded production and positional replacement. They do not predict this week’s touches, touchdowns, injuries, or coaching decisions.
Can I change the roster settings?
Yes. Open the scoring-impact lab to change league size, quarterback demand, dedicated starters, FLEX depth, reception scoring, and passing-touchdown points.
Use your exact lineup
Open impact lab →Change FLEX spots, starters, format, or scoring in the lab.
Values use market release ftt-20260913T165752Z, updated September 13, 2026. Market source: Tradyr public API. Scoring adjustments are deterministic and documented in the published methodology.