PPR redraft wide receiver rankings.
Rank wide receivers for a 12-team redraft PPR league. Every value starts with the current market and changes only when the player’s scoring profile separates from same-position replacement.
The scoring context behind the list.
PPR Redraft Wide Receiver Rankings should answer a league-specific question, not paste a generic list under a new label. This board uses the redraft market, 12 teams, 1QB roster demand, PPR reception rules. The value change is measured against the replacement option at the same position, so the table shows where this exact setup produces a real difference.
Values price the current season rather than long-term age and resale value.
Every reception adds one fantasy point.
One starting quarterback keeps the replacement tier closer to the starters.
Starter demand and exact rookie-pick availability are calculated for 12 teams rather than borrowed from a 12-team board.
Each wide receiver is measured against the replacement option created by this lineup.
Top WR assets
4-point passing TD · Full PPR · 12 teams · 1 FLEX
| Rank | Player | Base | League value | Change | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ja'Marr Chase | 906 | 1000 | +94 | 3.37 points/game more over replacement |
| 2 | Puka Nacua | 867 | 1000 | +133 | 3.40 points/game more over replacement |
| 3 | Jaxon Smith-Njigba | 819 | 951 | +132 | 2.04 points/game more over replacement |
| 4 | Amon-Ra St. Brown | 779 | 935 | +156 | 2.85 points/game more over replacement |
| 5 | CeeDee Lamb | 714 | 832 | +118 | 2.09 points/game more over replacement |
| 6 | Justin Jefferson | 691 | 772 | +81 | 1.48 points/game more over replacement |
| 7 | Nico Collins | 498 | 538 | +40 | 1.02 points/game more over replacement |
| 8 | Malik Nabers | 486 | 537 | +51 | 1.86 points/game more over replacement |
| 9 | George Pickens | 507 | 536 | +29 | 0.72 points/game more over replacement |
| 10 | Drake London | 468 | 520 | +52 | 1.42 points/game more over replacement |
| 11 | Chris Olave | 455 | 504 | +49 | 1.36 points/game more over replacement |
| 12 | DeVonta Smith | 430 | 455 | +25 | 0.73 points/game more over replacement |
| 13 | Rashee Rice | 371 | 425 | +54 | 2.10 points/game more over replacement |
| 14 | A.J. Brown | 356 | 391 | +35 | 1.26 points/game more over replacement |
| 15 | Zay Flowers | 369 | 390 | +21 | 0.72 points/game more over replacement |
| 16 | Ladd McConkey | 367 | 378 | +11 | 0.39 points/game more over replacement |
| 17 | Jaylen Waddle | 360 | 362 | +2 | 0.05 points/game more over replacement |
| 18 | Garrett Wilson | 310 | 344 | +34 | 1.38 points/game more over replacement |
| 19 | Tee Higgins | 304 | 314 | +10 | 0.41 points/game more over replacement |
| 20 | Emeka Egbuka | 313 | 303 | -10 | 0.39 points/game less over replacement |
| 21 | Tetairoa McMillan | 301 | 302 | +1 | 0.03 points/game more over replacement |
| 22 | Davante Adams | 253 | 273 | +20 | 1.01 points/game more over replacement |
| 23 | Jameson Williams | 238 | 228 | -10 | 0.55 points/game less over replacement |
| 24 | DJ Moore | 221 | 223 | +2 | 0.13 points/game more over replacement |
Biggest fallers
How to read these values.
Who leads these ppr redraft wide receiver rankings?
The live table above is the current answer. It combines the validated redraft market with PPR scoring over replacement and changes when a new market release is published.
How is this different from a generic redraft ranking?
The board uses PPR reception scoring, 1QB quarterback demand. Those settings can change both replacement and the price gap between players.
Are these weekly projections?
No. These are current trade values adjusted with recorded production and positional replacement. They do not predict this week’s touches, touchdowns, injuries, or coaching decisions.
Can I change the roster settings?
Yes. Open the scoring-impact lab to change league size, quarterback demand, dedicated starters, FLEX depth, reception scoring, and passing-touchdown points.
Change FLEX spots, starters, format, or scoring in the lab.
Values use market release ftt-20260913T165752Z, updated September 13, 2026. Market source: Tradyr public API. Scoring adjustments are deterministic and documented in the published methodology.






























