Scoring research // Half PPR receivers
Half PPR wide receiver rankings.
Current dynasty wide receiver values for Half PPR leagues, calculated from the market anchor and each receiver’s scoring change over positional replacement.
Half PPR scoring4-point passing TDs12 teams · 1 FLEXRelease ftt-20260910T232215Z
What changes
The scoring context behind the list.
Half PPR narrows the reward for reception volume without removing it. The useful trade-value question is how much a receiver changes relative to the WR replacement option, not simply how many catches appear in his stat line.
Half per catch
Each reception contributes 0.5 fantasy points.
Full PPR anchor
The neutral published market uses one point per reception.
Receiver demand
Dedicated WR starters and FLEX demand determine replacement.
Auditable adjustment
The table exposes base value, league value, change, and the VORP reason.
Current values
Top WR assets
4-point passing TD · Half PPR · 12 teams · 1 FLEX
| Rank | Player | Base | League value | Change | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ja'Marr Chase WR · CIN | 907 | 863 | -44 | 2.02 points/game less over replacement |
| 2 | Jaxon Smith-Njigba WR · SEA | 839 | 812 | -27 | 1.36 points/game less over replacement |
| 3 | Puka Nacua WR · LAR | 806 | 767 | -39 | 2.04 points/game less over replacement |
| 4 | Amon-Ra St. Brown WR · DET | 698 | 669 | -29 | 1.76 points/game less over replacement |
| 5 | Justin Jefferson WR · MIN | 647 | 630 | -17 | 1.08 points/game less over replacement |
| 6 | Malik Nabers WR · NYG | 622 | 608 | -14 | 1.26 points/game less over replacement |
| 7 | CeeDee Lamb WR · DAL | 609 | 589 | -20 | 1.38 points/game less over replacement |
| 8 | Drake London WR · ATL | 489 | 477 | -12 | 1.04 points/game less over replacement |
| 9 | George PickensWR · DAL | 479 | 471 | -8 | 0.69 points/game less over replacement |
| 10 | Nico Collins WR · HOU | 433 | 424 | -9 | 0.84 points/game less over replacement |
| 11 | Tetairoa McMillan WR · CAR | 421 | 417 | -4 | 0.35 points/game less over replacement |
| 12 | Chris Olave WR · NO | 419 | 409 | -10 | 1.01 points/game less over replacement |
| 13 | Emeka Egbuka WR · TB | 396 | 395 | -1 | 0.14 points/game less over replacement |
| 14 | A.J. Brown WR · NE | 390 | 381 | -9 | 0.97 points/game less over replacement |
| 15 | Garrett Wilson WR · NYJ | 387 | 377 | -10 | 1.03 points/game less over replacement |
| 16 | Ladd McConkey WR · LAC | 378 | 373 | -5 | 0.53 points/game less over replacement |
| 17 | DeVonta Smith WR · PHI | 363 | 357 | -6 | 0.70 points/game less over replacement |
| 18 | Zay Flowers WR · BAL | 355 | 349 | -6 | 0.69 points/game less over replacement |
| 19 | Luther Burden WR · CHI | 341 | 342 | +1 | 0.14 points/game more over replacement |
| 20 | Jaylen Waddle WR · DEN | 338 | 335 | -3 | 0.36 points/game less over replacement |
| 21 | Rashee Rice WR · KC | 341 | 331 | -10 | 1.39 points/game less over replacement |
| 22 | Tee HigginsWR · CIN | 317 | 313 | -4 | 0.54 points/game less over replacement |
| 23 | Rome OdunzeWR · CHI | 298 | 298 | 0 | 0.04 points/game less over replacement |
| 24 | Marvin Harrison Jr WR · ARI | 296 | 296 | 0 | 0.04 points/game less over replacement |
Biggest fallers
How to read these values.
How should I rank wide receivers in Half PPR?
Start with the current market, then use the league-value column to account for reception scoring relative to the replacement receiver.
Do high-volume wide receivers lose value from Full PPR?
They lose raw reception points, but their relative trade value falls only when that loss is worse than the loss at replacement.
Is Half PPR exactly halfway between Standard and PPR?
The reception rule is halfway, but the final market adjustment also depends on replacement, confidence, roster shape, and caps.
Can this ranking model four starting wide receivers?
Yes. Open the linked scoring-impact lab and change dedicated WR starters from three to four.
Use your exact lineup
Open impact lab →Change FLEX spots, starters, format, or scoring in the lab.
Values use market release ftt-20260910T232215Z, updated September 10, 2026. Market source: Tradyr public API. Scoring adjustments are deterministic and documented in the published methodology.