Scoring research // Half PPR receivers
Half PPR wide receiver rankings.
Current dynasty wide receiver values for Half PPR leagues, calculated from the market anchor and each receiver’s scoring change over positional replacement.
Half PPR scoring4-point passing TDs12 teams · 1 FLEXRelease ftt-20261011T112344Z
What changes
The scoring context behind the list.
Half PPR narrows the reward for reception volume without removing it. The useful trade-value question is how much a receiver changes relative to the WR replacement option, not simply how many catches appear in his stat line.
Half per catch
Each reception contributes 0.5 fantasy points.
Standard baseline
The neutral scoring reference uses zero points per reception.
Receiver demand
Dedicated WR starters and FLEX demand determine replacement.
Auditable adjustment
The table exposes base value, league value, change, and the VORP reason.
Current values
Top WR assets
4-point passing TD · Half PPR · 12 teams · 1 FLEX
| Rank | Player | Base | League value | Change | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jaxon Smith-Njigba WR · SEA | 973 | 1000 | +27 | 1.30 points/game more over replacement |
| 2 | Ja'Marr Chase WR · CIN | 843 | 924 | +81 | 1.96 points/game more over replacement |
| 3 | Puka Nacua WR · LAR | 759 | 833 | +74 | 1.98 points/game more over replacement |
| 4 | Amon-Ra St. Brown WR · DET | 737 | 799 | +62 | 1.70 points/game more over replacement |
| 5 | CeeDee Lamb WR · DAL | 700 | 746 | +46 | 1.32 points/game more over replacement |
| 6 | Justin Jefferson WR · MIN | 639 | 671 | +32 | 1.02 points/game more over replacement |
| 7 | Drake London WR · ATL | 616 | 646 | +30 | 0.99 points/game more over replacement |
| 8 | Malik Nabers WR · NYG | 598 | 624 | +26 | 1.21 points/game more over replacement |
| 9 | Chris Olave WR · NO | 588 | 616 | +28 | 0.96 points/game more over replacement |
| 10 | Tetairoa McMillan WR · CAR | 579 | 587 | +8 | 0.29 points/game more over replacement |
| 11 | Zay Flowers WR · BAL | 554 | 571 | +17 | 0.64 points/game more over replacement |
| 12 | Nico Collins WR · HOU | 535 | 556 | +21 | 0.79 points/game more over replacement |
| 13 | Garrett Wilson WR · NYJ | 509 | 533 | +24 | 0.97 points/game more over replacement |
| 14 | George PickensWR · DAL | 483 | 498 | +15 | 0.64 points/game more over replacement |
| 15 | Parker Washington WR · JAX | 461 | 453 | -8 | 0.37 points/game less over replacement |
| 16 | DeVonta Smith WR · PHI | 432 | 446 | +14 | 0.64 points/game more over replacement |
| 17 | Tee HigginsWR · CIN | 425 | 435 | +10 | 0.48 points/game more over replacement |
| 18 | Luther Burden WR · CHI | 435 | 431 | -4 | 0.20 points/game less over replacement |
| 19 | Emeka Egbuka WR · TB | 427 | 429 | +2 | 0.08 points/game more over replacement |
| 20 | Christian Watson WR · GB | 402 | 396 | -6 | 0.28 points/game less over replacement |
| 21 | Ladd McConkey WR · LAC | 387 | 396 | +9 | 0.47 points/game more over replacement |
| 22 | Michael Wilson WR · ARI | 386 | 389 | +3 | 0.14 points/game more over replacement |
| 23 | A.J. Brown WR · NE | 364 | 380 | +16 | 0.91 points/game more over replacement |
| 24 | Rashee Rice WR · KC | 359 | 380 | +21 | 1.33 points/game more over replacement |
Biggest fallers
How to read these values.
How should I rank wide receivers in Half PPR?
Start with the current market, then use the league-value column to account for reception scoring relative to the replacement receiver.
Do high-volume wide receivers lose value from Full PPR?
They lose raw reception points, but their relative trade value falls only when that loss is worse than the loss at replacement.
Is Half PPR exactly halfway between Standard and PPR?
The reception rule is halfway, but the final market adjustment also depends on replacement, confidence, roster shape, and caps.
Can this ranking model four starting wide receivers?
Yes. Open the linked scoring-impact lab and change dedicated WR starters from three to four.
Use your exact lineup
Open impact lab →Change FLEX spots, starters, format, or scoring in the lab.
Values use market release ftt-20261011T112344Z, updated October 11, 2026. Market source: Tradyr public API. Scoring adjustments are deterministic and documented in the published methodology.