Dynasty Superflex baseline
Sam LaPorta
DET · TE7 · age 25.7
304#70 overall
Head-to-head // TERelease ftt-20260913T165752Z
Sam LaPorta or Harold Fannin: who has more dynasty value?
The short answer
Sam LaPorta and Harold Fannin are in the same current dynasty Superflex tier: 304 versus 306, a 0.7% gap.
This high-interest tight end comparison tests two strong dynasty prices across ordinary reception scoring, TE premium, and redraft. The model measures each player over tight end replacement instead of treating the premium as a blanket multiplier.
Dynasty Superflex baseline
Harold Fannin
CLE · TE6 · age 22.2
306#68 overall
Same players // four markets
What changes in Superflex, 1QB, TEP, and redraft?
These rows change one major market context at a time. Hover or focus the dotted labels for a plain-language definition. Values share one 0–1,000 composite scale.
| League setting | Sam LaPorta | Harold Fannin | Current answer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dynasty Superflex ⓘTwo QB-eligible starting slots; 4-point passing TDs and Standard scoring. | 304 | 306 | Same tier |
| Dynasty 1QB ⓘOne starting quarterback; 4-point passing TDs and Standard scoring. | 258 | 259 | Same tier |
| Superflex TEP ⓘSuperflex with an additional tight end reception premium. | 304 | 306 | Same tier |
| Redraft 1QB ⓘCurrent-season value only; one quarterback and Standard scoring. | 209 | 122 | Sam LaPorta +87 |
Format verdict // The leader changes across formats. There is no defensible format-free winner; use the row that matches your league.
Reception scoring // player-level
Does standard, half PPR, or full PPR change it?
PPR means points per reception: zero in standard, 0.5 in half PPR, and one in full PPR. Each adjustment is measured relative to a same-position replacement player.
| League setting | Sam LaPorta | Harold Fannin | Current answer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard ⓘReceptions score zero points; yards and touchdowns still score normally. | 304 | 306 | Same tier |
| Half PPR ⓘEach reception scores 0.5 points. | 303 | 306 | Same tier |
| Full PPR ⓘEach reception scores one point. | 306 | 310 | Same tier |
Scoring verdict: No leader flip appears in the displayed scoring settings. The gap ranges from 2 to 4 value points, so scoring can still change the price.
Observed production // 2025
The evidence underneath the market answer.
These are descriptive season results, not projections. Missing upstream fields remain visibly unavailable instead of being guessed.
Sam LaPorta
TE7- Fantasy points/game
- 6.3
- Consistency grade
- C
- Targets/game
- 2.9
- Receptions/game
- 2.4
- Receiving yards/game
- 28.8
- Catch rate
- 81.6%
Harold Fannin
TE6- Fantasy points/game
- 11.7
- Consistency grade
- A+
- Targets/game
- 6.7
- Receptions/game
- 4.5
- Receiving yards/game
- 45.7
- Catch rate
- 67.3%
Decision rule
Treat the gap like a tiebreaker.
Check the TEP row before paying a positional premium, then confirm that the dynasty or redraft market matches the roster window behind the move.
Yes, the current baseline supports treating Sam LaPorta and Harold Fannin as straight-up trade peers. A manager can still prefer either side, but the model does not support a large automatic add. Injury status, starting-lineup need, and manager-specific preference are outside this model.
Direct answers
Comparison FAQ
Who is worth more in dynasty: Sam LaPorta or Harold Fannin?
Sam LaPorta and Harold Fannin are in the same current dynasty Superflex tier: 304 versus 306, a 0.7% gap.
Should I trade Sam LaPorta for Harold Fannin straight up?
Yes, the current baseline supports treating Sam LaPorta and Harold Fannin as straight-up trade peers. A manager can still prefer either side, but the model does not support a large automatic add.
Does scoring change the Sam LaPorta vs. Harold Fannin comparison?
No leader flip appears in the displayed scoring settings. The gap ranges from 2 to 4 value points, so scoring can still change the price.
Why do Superflex and 1QB values differ?
Quarterback scarcity changes enough across the displayed formats to change which side leads. Use the row matching your league rather than the universal baseline.
Same-position decisions