Dynasty Superflex baseline
Ladd McConkey
LAC · WR20 · age 24.9
411#57 overall
Head-to-head // WRRelease ftt-20261006T185416Z
Ladd McConkey or Emeka Egbuka: who has more dynasty value?
The short answer
Ladd McConkey and Emeka Egbuka are in the same current dynasty Superflex tier: 411 versus 418, a 1.7% gap.
McConkey's listed rib issue places short-term availability beside Egbuka's nearby dynasty price. The comparison keeps that current context separate from the underlying Standard, Half PPR, Full PPR, redraft, and dynasty values.
Dynasty Superflex baseline
Emeka Egbuka
TB · WR17 · age 23.9
418#53 overall
Latest usage // through Week 4
What changed on the field?
Recent workload and listed availability add context to the market price. They describe what happened; they do not predict the next game.
Week 4 · vs. SEA
Ladd McConkey
- PPR points
- 0 Latest game
- Targets
- 2 -3 from the prior recorded week
- Snap share
- 34% Latest game
Listed availability: Week 4: Questionable · Foot.
See the Week 4 WR usage report →Week 4 · vs. GB
Emeka Egbuka
- PPR points
- 3.3 Latest game
- Targets
- 4 -5 from the prior recorded week
- Snap share
- 94% Latest game
Listed availability: Week 1: Full · Toe.
See the Week 4 WR usage report →Same players // four markets
What changes in Superflex, 1QB, TEP, and redraft?
These rows change one major market context at a time. Hover or focus the dotted labels for a plain-language definition. Values share one 0–1,000 composite scale.
| League setting | Ladd McConkey | Emeka Egbuka | Current answer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dynasty Superflex ⓘTwo QB-eligible starting slots; 4-point passing TDs and Standard scoring. | 411 | 418 | Same tier |
| Dynasty 1QB ⓘOne starting quarterback; 4-point passing TDs and Standard scoring. | 453 | 456 | Same tier |
| Superflex TEP ⓘSuperflex with an additional tight end reception premium. | 411 | 418 | Same tier |
| Redraft 1QB ⓘCurrent-season value only; one quarterback and Standard scoring. | 178 | 120 | Ladd McConkey +58 |
Format verdict // The leader changes across formats. There is no defensible format-free winner; use the row that matches your league.
Reception scoring // player-level
Does standard, half PPR, or full PPR change it?
PPR means points per reception: zero in standard, 0.5 in half PPR, and one in full PPR. Each adjustment is measured relative to a same-position replacement player.
| League setting | Ladd McConkey | Emeka Egbuka | Current answer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard ⓘReceptions score zero points; yards and touchdowns still score normally. | 411 | 418 | Same tier |
| Half PPR ⓘEach reception scores 0.5 points. | 421 | 420 | Same tier |
| Full PPR ⓘEach reception scores one point. | 430 | 421 | Same tier |
Scoring verdict: Yes. The higher-valued side changes across the displayed scoring settings, so this league setting can change the answer.
Observed production // 2025
The evidence underneath the market answer.
These are descriptive season results, not projections. Missing upstream fields remain visibly unavailable instead of being guessed.
Ladd McConkey
WR20- Fantasy points/game
- 10.6
- Consistency grade
- C
- Targets/game
- 6.2
- Receptions/game
- 3.9
- Receiving yards/game
- 46.4
- Catch rate
- 62.3%
Emeka Egbuka
WR17- Fantasy points/game
- 11.5
- Consistency grade
- D
- Targets/game
- 7.5
- Receptions/game
- 3.7
- Receiving yards/game
- 55.2
- Catch rate
- 49.6%
Decision rule
Treat the gap like a tiebreaker.
Use availability to manage the immediate week, then require the market and reception rows to support any lasting discount in a dynasty exchange.
Yes, the current baseline supports treating Ladd McConkey and Emeka Egbuka as straight-up trade peers. A manager can still prefer either side, but the model does not support a large automatic add. Recent usage and listed availability provide context, but starting-lineup need and manager-specific preference remain outside the model.
Direct answers
Comparison FAQ
Who is worth more in dynasty: Ladd McConkey or Emeka Egbuka?
Ladd McConkey and Emeka Egbuka are in the same current dynasty Superflex tier: 411 versus 418, a 1.7% gap.
Should I trade Ladd McConkey for Emeka Egbuka straight up?
Yes, the current baseline supports treating Ladd McConkey and Emeka Egbuka as straight-up trade peers. A manager can still prefer either side, but the model does not support a large automatic add.
Does scoring change the Ladd McConkey vs. Emeka Egbuka comparison?
Yes. The higher-valued side changes across the displayed scoring settings, so this league setting can change the answer.
Why do Superflex and 1QB values differ?
Quarterback scarcity changes enough across the displayed formats to change which side leads. Use the row matching your league rather than the universal baseline.
Same-position decisions