Dynasty Superflex baseline
Isaiah Likely
NYG · TE12 · age 26.4
186#107 overall
Head-to-head // TERelease ftt-20260911T004656Z
Isaiah Likely or Kyle Pitts: who has more dynasty value?
The short answer
Kyle Pitts is currently worth more than Isaiah Likely in dynasty Superflex: 261 versus 186, a 28.7% gap.
This tight end comparison tests whether a close baseline price survives the league setting most likely to move it. The dedicated TEP row uses player-level reception evidence and same-position replacement instead of assuming every tight end rises equally.
Dynasty Superflex baseline
Kyle Pitts
ATL · TE8 · age 25.9
261#84 overall
Same players // four markets
What changes in Superflex, 1QB, TEP, and redraft?
These rows change one major market context at a time. Hover or focus the dotted labels for a plain-language definition. Values share one 0–1,000 composite scale.
| League setting | Isaiah Likely | Kyle Pitts | Current answer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dynasty Superflex ⓘTwo QB-eligible starting slots; 4-point passing TDs and Standard scoring. | 186 | 261 | Kyle Pitts +75 |
| Dynasty 1QB ⓘOne starting quarterback; 4-point passing TDs and Standard scoring. | 161 | 226 | Kyle Pitts +65 |
| Superflex TEP ⓘSuperflex with an additional tight end reception premium. | 186 | 261 | Kyle Pitts +75 |
| Redraft 1QB ⓘCurrent-season value only; one quarterback and Standard scoring. | 84 | 137 | Kyle Pitts +53 |
Format verdict // The same player leads all four markets, but the gap ranges from 53 to 75 points. Format still changes the price.
Reception scoring // player-level
Does standard, half PPR, or full PPR change it?
PPR means points per reception: zero in standard, 0.5 in half PPR, and one in full PPR. Each adjustment is measured relative to a same-position replacement player.
| League setting | Isaiah Likely | Kyle Pitts | Current answer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard ⓘReceptions score zero points; yards and touchdowns still score normally. | 186 | 261 | Kyle Pitts +75 |
| Half PPR ⓘEach reception scores 0.5 points. | 179 | 259 | Kyle Pitts +80 |
| Full PPR ⓘEach reception scores one point. | 174 | 261 | Kyle Pitts +87 |
Scoring verdict: No leader flip appears in the displayed scoring settings. The gap ranges from 75 to 87 value points, so scoring can still change the price.
Observed production // 2025
The evidence underneath the market answer.
These are descriptive season results, not projections. Missing upstream fields remain visibly unavailable instead of being guessed.
Isaiah Likely
TE12- Fantasy points/game
- Not available
- Consistency grade
- F
- Targets/game
- Not available
- Receptions/game
- Not available
- Receiving yards/game
- Not available
- Catch rate
- Not available
Kyle Pitts
TE8- Fantasy points/game
- 12.4
- Consistency grade
- C
- Targets/game
- 6.9
- Receptions/game
- 5.2
- Receiving yards/game
- 54.6
- Catch rate
- 74.6%
Decision rule
Start with Kyle Pitts's edge.
Only pay the TEP-specific difference in a league that awards the premium; in ordinary formats, keep the baseline market as the negotiation anchor.
Not at the baseline price. Kyle Pitts holds the larger current value, so a straight swap gives up a 28.7% market edge before roster fit is considered. Injury status, starting-lineup need, and manager-specific preference are outside this model.
Direct answers
Comparison FAQ
Who is worth more in dynasty: Isaiah Likely or Kyle Pitts?
Kyle Pitts is currently worth more than Isaiah Likely in dynasty Superflex: 261 versus 186, a 28.7% gap.
Should I trade Isaiah Likely for Kyle Pitts straight up?
Not at the baseline price. Kyle Pitts holds the larger current value, so a straight swap gives up a 28.7% market edge before roster fit is considered.
Does scoring change the Isaiah Likely vs. Kyle Pitts comparison?
No leader flip appears in the displayed scoring settings. The gap ranges from 75 to 87 value points, so scoring can still change the price.
Why do Superflex and 1QB values differ?
Superflex makes starting quarterbacks scarcer, while 1QB pushes replacement closer to the starters. The displayed format gap ranges from 53 to 75 value points.
Same-position decisions