Dynasty Superflex baseline
David Montgomery
HOU · RB34 · age 29.3
228#123 overall
Head-to-head // RBRelease ftt-20261011T112344Z
David Montgomery or Josh Jacobs: who has more dynasty value?
The short answer
David Montgomery and Josh Jacobs are in the same current dynasty Superflex tier: 228 versus 226, a 0.9% gap.
Veteran running backs often force contenders to balance current production against a fragile dynasty value window. This comparison puts the dynasty and redraft answers side by side, then checks whether reception scoring changes the price.
Dynasty Superflex baseline
Josh Jacobs
GB · RB36 · age 28.6
226#126 overall
Same players // four markets
What changes in Superflex, 1QB, TEP, and redraft?
These rows change one major market context at a time. Hover or focus the dotted labels for a plain-language definition. Values share one 0–1,000 composite scale.
| League setting | David Montgomery | Josh Jacobs | Current answer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dynasty Superflex ⓘTwo QB-eligible starting slots; 4-point passing TDs and Standard scoring. | 228 | 226 | Same tier |
| Dynasty 1QB ⓘOne starting quarterback; 4-point passing TDs and Standard scoring. | 301 | 295 | Same tier |
| Superflex TEP ⓘSuperflex with an additional tight end reception premium. | 228 | 226 | Same tier |
| Redraft 1QB ⓘCurrent-season value only; one quarterback and Standard scoring. | 175 | 104 | David Montgomery +71 |
Format verdict // The same player leads all four markets, but the gap ranges from 2 to 71 points. Format still changes the price.
Reception scoring // player-level
Does standard, half PPR, or full PPR change it?
PPR means points per reception: zero in standard, 0.5 in half PPR, and one in full PPR. Each adjustment is measured relative to a same-position replacement player.
| League setting | David Montgomery | Josh Jacobs | Current answer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard ⓘReceptions score zero points; yards and touchdowns still score normally. | 228 | 226 | Same tier |
| Half PPR ⓘEach reception scores 0.5 points. | 226 | 225 | Same tier |
| Full PPR ⓘEach reception scores one point. | 227 | 228 | Same tier |
Scoring verdict: Yes. The higher-valued side changes across the displayed scoring settings, so this league setting can change the answer.
Observed production // 2025
The evidence underneath the market answer.
These are descriptive season results, not projections. Missing upstream fields remain visibly unavailable instead of being guessed.
David Montgomery
RB34- Fantasy points/game
- Not available
- Consistency grade
- F
- Rush yards/game
- Not available
- Carries/game
- Not available
- Receptions/game
- Not available
- Total TD/game
- Not available
Josh Jacobs
RB36- Fantasy points/game
- 15.8
- Consistency grade
- A
- Rush yards/game
- 61.9
- Carries/game
- 15.6
- Receptions/game
- 2.4
- Total TD/game
- 0.9
Decision rule
Treat the gap like a tiebreaker.
Contenders can use the redraft row to justify a short-term preference, while dynasty managers should keep any added value tied to the measured gap.
Yes, the current baseline supports treating David Montgomery and Josh Jacobs as straight-up trade peers. A manager can still prefer either side, but the model does not support a large automatic add. Recent usage and listed availability provide context, but starting-lineup need and manager-specific preference remain outside the model.
Direct answers
Comparison FAQ
Who is worth more in dynasty: David Montgomery or Josh Jacobs?
David Montgomery and Josh Jacobs are in the same current dynasty Superflex tier: 228 versus 226, a 0.9% gap.
Should I trade David Montgomery for Josh Jacobs straight up?
Yes, the current baseline supports treating David Montgomery and Josh Jacobs as straight-up trade peers. A manager can still prefer either side, but the model does not support a large automatic add.
Does scoring change the David Montgomery vs. Josh Jacobs comparison?
Yes. The higher-valued side changes across the displayed scoring settings, so this league setting can change the answer.
Why do Superflex and 1QB values differ?
Superflex makes starting quarterbacks scarcer, while 1QB pushes replacement closer to the starters. The displayed format gap ranges from 2 to 71 value points.
Same-position decisions