Dynasty Superflex baseline
D'Andre Swift
CHI · RB19 · age 27.7
361#73 overall
Head-to-head // RBRelease ftt-20261011T112344Z
D'Andre Swift or Josh Jacobs: who has more dynasty value?
The short answer
D'Andre Swift is currently worth more than Josh Jacobs in dynasty Superflex: 361 versus 226, a 37.4% gap.
Two veteran backs with different receiving histories make this a practical format-specific trade decision. The table shows exactly how Standard, Half PPR, Full PPR, dynasty, and redraft alter the current value gap over RB replacement.
Dynasty Superflex baseline
Josh Jacobs
GB · RB36 · age 28.6
226#126 overall
Same players // four markets
What changes in Superflex, 1QB, TEP, and redraft?
These rows change one major market context at a time. Hover or focus the dotted labels for a plain-language definition. Values share one 0–1,000 composite scale.
| League setting | D'Andre Swift | Josh Jacobs | Current answer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dynasty Superflex ⓘTwo QB-eligible starting slots; 4-point passing TDs and Standard scoring. | 361 | 226 | D'Andre Swift +135 |
| Dynasty 1QB ⓘOne starting quarterback; 4-point passing TDs and Standard scoring. | 433 | 295 | D'Andre Swift +138 |
| Superflex TEP ⓘSuperflex with an additional tight end reception premium. | 361 | 226 | D'Andre Swift +135 |
| Redraft 1QB ⓘCurrent-season value only; one quarterback and Standard scoring. | 358 | 104 | D'Andre Swift +254 |
Format verdict // The same player leads all four markets, but the gap ranges from 135 to 254 points. Format still changes the price.
Reception scoring // player-level
Does standard, half PPR, or full PPR change it?
PPR means points per reception: zero in standard, 0.5 in half PPR, and one in full PPR. Each adjustment is measured relative to a same-position replacement player.
| League setting | D'Andre Swift | Josh Jacobs | Current answer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard ⓘReceptions score zero points; yards and touchdowns still score normally. | 361 | 226 | D'Andre Swift +135 |
| Half PPR ⓘEach reception scores 0.5 points. | 359 | 225 | D'Andre Swift +134 |
| Full PPR ⓘEach reception scores one point. | 364 | 228 | D'Andre Swift +136 |
Scoring verdict: No leader flip appears in the displayed scoring settings. The gap ranges from 134 to 136 value points, so scoring can still change the price.
Observed production // 2025
The evidence underneath the market answer.
These are descriptive season results, not projections. Missing upstream fields remain visibly unavailable instead of being guessed.
D'Andre Swift
RB19- Fantasy points/game
- 14.3
- Consistency grade
- C
- Rush yards/game
- 67.9
- Carries/game
- 13.9
- Receptions/game
- 2.1
- Total TD/game
- 0.6
Josh Jacobs
RB36- Fantasy points/game
- 15.8
- Consistency grade
- A
- Rush yards/game
- 61.9
- Carries/game
- 15.6
- Receptions/game
- 2.4
- Total TD/game
- 0.9
Decision rule
Start with D'Andre Swift's edge.
Match the row to the league and timeline first; when the result stays close, prefer roster fit instead of forcing a meaningful add.
Not at the baseline price. D'Andre Swift holds the larger current value, so a straight swap gives up a 37.4% market edge before roster fit is considered. Recent usage and listed availability provide context, but starting-lineup need and manager-specific preference remain outside the model.
Direct answers
Comparison FAQ
Who is worth more in dynasty: D'Andre Swift or Josh Jacobs?
D'Andre Swift is currently worth more than Josh Jacobs in dynasty Superflex: 361 versus 226, a 37.4% gap.
Should I trade D'Andre Swift for Josh Jacobs straight up?
Not at the baseline price. D'Andre Swift holds the larger current value, so a straight swap gives up a 37.4% market edge before roster fit is considered.
Does scoring change the D'Andre Swift vs. Josh Jacobs comparison?
No leader flip appears in the displayed scoring settings. The gap ranges from 134 to 136 value points, so scoring can still change the price.
Why do Superflex and 1QB values differ?
Superflex makes starting quarterbacks scarcer, while 1QB pushes replacement closer to the starters. The displayed format gap ranges from 135 to 254 value points.
Same-position decisions