Dynasty Superflex baseline
Dalton Kincaid
BUF · TE10 · age 26.9
207#99 overall
Head-to-head // TERelease ftt-20260913T165752Z
Dalton Kincaid or Kyle Pitts: who has more dynasty value?
The short answer
Kyle Pitts is currently worth more than Dalton Kincaid in dynasty Superflex: 263 versus 207, a 21.3% gap.
Two similarly priced tight ends can separate meaningfully when reception scoring and positional replacement are explicit. The page keeps Standard, Half PPR, Full PPR, TEP, dynasty, and redraft prices distinct instead of guessing future opportunity.
Dynasty Superflex baseline
Kyle Pitts
ATL · TE8 · age 25.9
263#85 overall
Same players // four markets
What changes in Superflex, 1QB, TEP, and redraft?
These rows change one major market context at a time. Hover or focus the dotted labels for a plain-language definition. Values share one 0–1,000 composite scale.
| League setting | Dalton Kincaid | Kyle Pitts | Current answer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dynasty Superflex ⓘTwo QB-eligible starting slots; 4-point passing TDs and Standard scoring. | 207 | 263 | Kyle Pitts +56 |
| Dynasty 1QB ⓘOne starting quarterback; 4-point passing TDs and Standard scoring. | 175 | 223 | Kyle Pitts +48 |
| Superflex TEP ⓘSuperflex with an additional tight end reception premium. | 207 | 263 | Kyle Pitts +56 |
| Redraft 1QB ⓘCurrent-season value only; one quarterback and Standard scoring. | 88 | 163 | Kyle Pitts +75 |
Format verdict // The same player leads all four markets, but the gap ranges from 48 to 75 points. Format still changes the price.
Reception scoring // player-level
Does standard, half PPR, or full PPR change it?
PPR means points per reception: zero in standard, 0.5 in half PPR, and one in full PPR. Each adjustment is measured relative to a same-position replacement player.
| League setting | Dalton Kincaid | Kyle Pitts | Current answer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard ⓘReceptions score zero points; yards and touchdowns still score normally. | 207 | 263 | Kyle Pitts +56 |
| Half PPR ⓘEach reception scores 0.5 points. | 203 | 261 | Kyle Pitts +58 |
| Full PPR ⓘEach reception scores one point. | 202 | 263 | Kyle Pitts +61 |
Scoring verdict: No leader flip appears in the displayed scoring settings. The gap ranges from 56 to 61 value points, so scoring can still change the price.
Observed production // 2025
The evidence underneath the market answer.
These are descriptive season results, not projections. Missing upstream fields remain visibly unavailable instead of being guessed.
Dalton Kincaid
TE10- Fantasy points/game
- Not available
- Consistency grade
- C
- Targets/game
- Not available
- Receptions/game
- Not available
- Receiving yards/game
- Not available
- Catch rate
- Not available
Kyle Pitts
TE8- Fantasy points/game
- 12.4
- Consistency grade
- C
- Targets/game
- 6.9
- Receptions/game
- 5.2
- Receiving yards/game
- 54.6
- Catch rate
- 74.6%
Decision rule
Start with Kyle Pitts's edge.
Treat the result as a roster-fit decision and avoid paying a meaningful premium unless the exact league setting creates a clear measured edge.
Not at the baseline price. Kyle Pitts holds the larger current value, so a straight swap gives up a 21.3% market edge before roster fit is considered. Injury status, starting-lineup need, and manager-specific preference are outside this model.
Direct answers
Comparison FAQ
Who is worth more in dynasty: Dalton Kincaid or Kyle Pitts?
Kyle Pitts is currently worth more than Dalton Kincaid in dynasty Superflex: 263 versus 207, a 21.3% gap.
Should I trade Dalton Kincaid for Kyle Pitts straight up?
Not at the baseline price. Kyle Pitts holds the larger current value, so a straight swap gives up a 21.3% market edge before roster fit is considered.
Does scoring change the Dalton Kincaid vs. Kyle Pitts comparison?
No leader flip appears in the displayed scoring settings. The gap ranges from 56 to 61 value points, so scoring can still change the price.
Why do Superflex and 1QB values differ?
Superflex makes starting quarterbacks scarcer, while 1QB pushes replacement closer to the starters. The displayed format gap ranges from 48 to 75 value points.
Same-position decisions