Dynasty Superflex baseline
Baker Mayfield
TB · QB17 · age 31.4
334#58 overall
Head-to-head // QBRelease ftt-20260911T004656Z
Baker Mayfield or Jared Goff: who has more dynasty value?
The short answer
Baker Mayfield and Jared Goff are in the same current dynasty Superflex tier: 334 versus 331, a 0.9% gap.
Two productive veteran quarterbacks sit almost level in the current Superflex market, making this a useful test of passing-touchdown scoring. The format table shows whether six-point passing touchdowns create separation or leave the decision inside one tier.
Dynasty Superflex baseline
Jared Goff
DET · QB18 · age 31.9
331#59 overall
Same players // four markets
What changes in Superflex, 1QB, TEP, and redraft?
These rows change one major market context at a time. Hover or focus the dotted labels for a plain-language definition. Values share one 0–1,000 composite scale.
| League setting | Baker Mayfield | Jared Goff | Current answer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dynasty Superflex ⓘTwo QB-eligible starting slots; 4-point passing TDs and Standard scoring. | 334 | 331 | Same tier |
| Dynasty 1QB ⓘOne starting quarterback; 4-point passing TDs and Standard scoring. | 168 | 166 | Same tier |
| Superflex TEP ⓘSuperflex with an additional tight end reception premium. | 334 | 331 | Same tier |
| Redraft 1QB ⓘCurrent-season value only; one quarterback and Standard scoring. | 57 | 51 | Baker Mayfield +6 |
Format verdict // The same player leads all four markets, but the gap ranges from 2 to 6 points. Format still changes the price.
Passing TD scoring // player-level
Does 4-point vs. 6-point passing TD scoring change it?
The added passing-TD points are calculated from each player’s observed rate, then measured against a replacement quarterback. It is not a generic multiplier.
| League setting | Baker Mayfield | Jared Goff | Current answer |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-point passing TD ⓘEach passing touchdown scores four points; Standard scoring remains on. | 334 | 331 | Same tier |
| 6-point passing TD ⓘEach passing touchdown scores six points; Standard scoring remains on. | 353 | 355 | Same tier |
Scoring verdict: Yes. The higher-valued side changes across the displayed scoring settings, so this league setting can change the answer.
Observed production // 2025
The evidence underneath the market answer.
These are descriptive season results, not projections. Missing upstream fields remain visibly unavailable instead of being guessed.
Baker Mayfield
QB17- Fantasy points/game
- 16.6
- Consistency grade
- C
- Pass yards/game
- 217.2
- Pass TD/game
- 1.5
- Rush yards/game
- 22.5
- Completion rate
- 63.2%
Jared Goff
QB18- Fantasy points/game
- 17.9
- Consistency grade
- B
- Pass yards/game
- 268.5
- Pass TD/game
- 2
- Rush yards/game
- 2.6
- Completion rate
- 68.0%
Decision rule
Treat the gap like a tiebreaker.
Let the measured scoring gap break a true tie, but do not pay a meaningful rookie-pick premium when both formats keep the quarterbacks together.
Yes, the current baseline supports treating Baker Mayfield and Jared Goff as straight-up trade peers. A manager can still prefer either side, but the model does not support a large automatic add. Injury status, starting-lineup need, and manager-specific preference are outside this model.
Direct answers
Comparison FAQ
Who is worth more in dynasty: Baker Mayfield or Jared Goff?
Baker Mayfield and Jared Goff are in the same current dynasty Superflex tier: 334 versus 331, a 0.9% gap.
Should I trade Baker Mayfield for Jared Goff straight up?
Yes, the current baseline supports treating Baker Mayfield and Jared Goff as straight-up trade peers. A manager can still prefer either side, but the model does not support a large automatic add.
Does scoring change the Baker Mayfield vs. Jared Goff comparison?
Yes. The higher-valued side changes across the displayed scoring settings, so this league setting can change the answer.
Why do Superflex and 1QB values differ?
Superflex makes starting quarterbacks scarcer, while 1QB pushes replacement closer to the starters. The displayed format gap ranges from 2 to 6 value points.
Same-position decisions