Free. No login. No nonsense.
Week 3 · updated Oct 6, 2026

Week 3 running backs usage report.

Jaylen Warren leads this week's role-trend ranking after playing 90% of offensive snaps and recording 21 carries + targets.

Players are ordered by the combination of snap-share change, opportunity change, and total involvement. The comparison uses each player's previous four recorded games when available.

RankPlayerMatchupSnap shareSnap changeCarries + targetsOpportunity changeHalf PPR
#1
PIT · Redraft rank 46
vs. CIN90%+46 pts21+5.519.1
#2
CAR · Redraft rank 28
vs. CLE84%+29 pts23+12.813.0
#3
ARI · Redraft rank 26
vs. SF64%+22 pts26+12.519.4
#4
NYG · Redraft rank 42
vs. TEN77%+27 pts24+8.811.5
#5
BUF · Redraft rank 12
vs. LAC67%+17 pts25+8.319.4
#6
DAL · Redraft rank 20
vs. BAL76%+17 pts22+7.017.3
#7
JAX · Redraft rank 41
vs. NE48%+12 pts17+7.516.0
#8
LAC · Redraft rank 145
vs. BUF38%+16 pts11+5.312.2
#9
CHI · Redraft rank 34
vs. PHI69%+8 pts23+7.09.8
#10
WAS · Redraft rank 102
vs. SEA57%+10 pts20+6.54.8
#11
MIN · Redraft rank 59
vs. TB80%+16 pts23+2.511.7
#12
LAR · Redraft rank 21
vs. DEN71%+8 pts22+6.818.8
#13
NYJ · Redraft rank 114
vs. DET52%+24 pts7-0.33.2
#14
HOU · Redraft rank 56
vs. IND63%+19 pts13+0.05.8
#15
SF · Redraft rank 9
vs. ARI83%+13 pts20+1.019.6
#16
DEN · Redraft rank 113
vs. LAR49%+5 pts19+5.85.8
#17
PHI · Redraft rank 25
vs. CHI72%+11 pts17+0.88.5
#18
ATL · Redraft rank 2
vs. GB72%-1 pts31+6.334.3
#19
IND · Redraft rank 5
vs. HOU85%+4 pts26+2.58.2
#20
BAL · Redraft rank 11
vs. DAL67%+7 pts27+1.821.4
#21
TEN · Redraft rank 93
vs. NYG53%-2 pts21+5.811.6
#22
KC · Redraft rank 4
vs. MIA73%+13 pts20-5.020.3
#23
ATL · Redraft rank 146
vs. GB27%+2 pts10+2.811.0
#24
DET · Redraft rank 1
vs. NYJ69%-5 pts28+2.537.9
#25
CLE · Redraft rank 51
vs. CAR51%-8 pts20+4.88.9
#26
WAS · Redraft rank 139
vs. SEA43%-1 pts9+0.310.6
#27
KC · Redraft rank 148
vs. MIA27%+0 pts6-1.01.7
#28
LV · Redraft rank 14
vs. NO84%+1 pts22-4.510.8
#29
LAR · Redraft rank 105
vs. DEN29%-3 pts10-0.82.5
#30
LV · Redraft rank 160
vs. NO16%-3 pts5-0.511.4
#31
CIN · Redraft rank 19
vs. PIT70%+5 pts15-7.87.9
#32
NE · Redraft rank 73
vs. JAX52%-2 pts10-3.55.3
#33
TEN · Redraft rank 175
vs. NYG47%+1 pts3-5.50.5
#34
TB · Redraft rank 159
vs. MIN46%-8 pts8-1.32.0
#35
CHI · Redraft rank 83
vs. PHI31%-9 pts10-0.83.1
#36
TB · Redraft rank 44
vs. MIN52%-12 pts19-0.86.8
#37
GB · Redraft rank 152
vs. ATL23%-5 pts7-2.72.8
#38
NE · Redraft rank 66
vs. JAX37%-6 pts9-4.53.4
#39
NO · Redraft rank 99
vs. LV32%-9 pts10-3.54.6
#40
NYJ · Redraft rank 31
vs. DET48%-11 pts16-4.37.0
#41
NO · Redraft rank 68
vs. LV38%-22 pts15-0.88.0
#42
ARI · Redraft rank 143
vs. SF36%-13 pts6-5.32.9
#43
SEA · Redraft rank 89
vs. WAS28%-13 pts8-5.50.7
#44
JAX · Redraft rank 172
vs. NE21%-18 pts8-3.39.7
#45
LAC · Redraft rank 40
vs. BUF42%-22 pts16-3.35.6
#46
DEN · Redraft rank 86
vs. LAR36%-22 pts9-5.57.7
#47
HOU · Redraft rank 109
vs. IND37%-16 pts6-8.58.6
#48
SF · Redraft rank 140
vs. ARI15%-23 pts5-6.01.7
#49
PHI · Redraft rank 174
vs. CHI4%-24 pts1-8.0-1.0

A dash means the player did not have enough prior games for a comparison. Opportunity is attempts plus carries for quarterbacks, carries plus targets for running backs, and targets for receivers and tight ends.

Read the role

Volume can move before fantasy points do.

More snaps and opportunities can reveal an expanding role, while a one-week touchdown total can hide a shrinking one.

Use this report with matchup and availability context. It is not a projection or a start/sit ranking.

Quarterbacks →Wide receivers →Tight ends →