Free. No login. No nonsense.
Week 3 · updated Oct 7, 2026

Week 3 running backs usage report.

Jaylen Warren leads this week's role-trend ranking after playing 90% of offensive snaps and recording 21 carries + targets.

Players are ordered by the combination of snap-share change, opportunity change, and total involvement. The comparison uses each player's previous four recorded games when available.

RankPlayerMatchupSnap shareSnap changeCarries + targetsOpportunity changeHalf PPR
#1
PIT · Redraft rank 37
vs. CIN90%+46 pts21+5.519.1
#2
CAR · Redraft rank 26
vs. CLE84%+29 pts23+12.813.0
#3
ARI · Redraft rank 27
vs. SF64%+22 pts26+12.519.4
#4
NYG · Redraft rank 47
vs. TEN77%+27 pts24+8.811.5
#5
BUF · Redraft rank 12
vs. LAC67%+17 pts25+8.319.4
#6
DAL · Redraft rank 21
vs. BAL76%+17 pts22+7.017.3
#7
JAX · Redraft rank 31
vs. NE48%+12 pts17+7.516.0
#8
LAC · Redraft rank 129
vs. BUF38%+16 pts11+5.312.2
#9
CHI · Redraft rank 33
vs. PHI69%+8 pts23+7.09.8
#10
WAS · Redraft rank 104
vs. SEA57%+10 pts20+6.54.8
#11
MIN · Redraft rank 55
vs. TB80%+16 pts23+2.511.7
#12
LAR · Redraft rank 19
vs. DEN71%+8 pts22+6.818.8
#13
NYJ · Redraft rank 126
vs. DET52%+24 pts7-0.33.2
#14
HOU · Redraft rank 62
vs. IND63%+19 pts13+0.05.8
#15
SF · Redraft rank 9
vs. ARI83%+13 pts20+1.019.6
#16
DEN · Redraft rank 117
vs. LAR49%+5 pts19+5.85.8
#17
PHI · Redraft rank 32
vs. CHI72%+11 pts17+0.88.5
#18
ATL · Redraft rank 2
vs. GB72%-1 pts31+6.334.3
#19
IND · Redraft rank 5
vs. HOU85%+4 pts26+2.58.2
#20
BAL · Redraft rank 11
vs. DAL67%+7 pts27+1.821.4
#21
TEN · Redraft rank 82
vs. NYG53%-2 pts21+5.811.6
#22
KC · Redraft rank 4
vs. MIA73%+13 pts20-5.020.3
#23
ATL · Redraft rank 105
vs. GB27%+2 pts10+2.811.0
#24
DET · Redraft rank 1
vs. NYJ69%-5 pts28+2.537.9
#25
CLE · Redraft rank 48
vs. CAR51%-8 pts20+4.88.9
#26
WAS · Redraft rank 136
vs. SEA43%-1 pts9+0.310.6
#27
KC · Redraft rank 153
vs. MIA27%+0 pts6-1.01.7
#28
LV · Redraft rank 13
vs. NO84%+1 pts22-4.510.8
#29
LAR · Redraft rank 108
vs. DEN29%-3 pts10-0.82.5
#30
LV · Redraft rank 159
vs. NO16%-3 pts5-0.511.4
#31
CIN · Redraft rank 20
vs. PIT70%+5 pts15-7.87.9
#32
NE · Redraft rank 65
vs. JAX52%-2 pts10-3.55.3
#33
TEN · Redraft rank 180
vs. NYG47%+1 pts3-5.50.5
#34
TB · Redraft rank 150
vs. MIN46%-8 pts8-1.32.0
#35
CHI · Redraft rank 67
vs. PHI31%-9 pts10-0.83.1
#36
TB · Redraft rank 44
vs. MIN52%-12 pts19-0.86.8
#37
GB · Redraft rank 146
vs. ATL23%-5 pts7-2.72.8
#38
NE · Redraft rank 70
vs. JAX37%-6 pts9-4.53.4
#39
NO · Redraft rank 92
vs. LV32%-9 pts10-3.54.6
#40
NYJ · Redraft rank 30
vs. DET48%-11 pts16-4.37.0
#41
NO · Redraft rank 71
vs. LV38%-22 pts15-0.88.0
#42
ARI · Redraft rank 122
vs. SF36%-13 pts6-5.32.9
#43
SEA · Redraft rank 101
vs. WAS28%-13 pts8-5.50.7
#44
JAX · Redraft rank 177
vs. NE21%-18 pts8-3.39.7
#45
LAC · Redraft rank 45
vs. BUF42%-22 pts16-3.35.6
#46
DEN · Redraft rank 77
vs. LAR36%-22 pts9-5.57.7
#47
HOU · Redraft rank 118
vs. IND37%-16 pts6-8.58.6
#48
SF · Redraft rank 145
vs. ARI15%-23 pts5-6.01.7
#49
PHI · Redraft rank 181
vs. CHI4%-24 pts1-8.0-1.0

A dash means the player did not have enough prior games for a comparison. Opportunity is attempts plus carries for quarterbacks, carries plus targets for running backs, and targets for receivers and tight ends.

Read the role

Volume can move before fantasy points do.

More snaps and opportunities can reveal an expanding role, while a one-week touchdown total can hide a shrinking one.

Use this report with matchup and availability context. It is not a projection or a start/sit ranking.

Quarterbacks →Wide receivers →Tight ends →