Standard scoring tight end rankings.
Rank dynasty tight ends without points per reception. Receiving yards and touchdowns remain, and the adjustment compares every player with tight end replacement.
The scoring context behind the list.
Tight end value combines a thin starting tier with uneven reception volume. Standard scoring removes the catch premium, but it does not erase positional scarcity; this board keeps those two effects separate.
Receptions score zero while yards and receiving touchdowns remain.
The comparison uses the tight end available after dedicated starter demand.
A shallow usable tier can preserve value even without reception points.
This page uses ordinary Standard scoring, not an extra tight end reception premium.
Top TE assets
4-point passing TD · Standard · 12 teams · 1 FLEX
| Rank | Player | Base | League value | Change | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brock Bowers | 713 | 677 | -36 | 1.62 points/game less over replacement |
| 2 | Trey McBride | 608 | 557 | -51 | 2.68 points/game less over replacement |
| 3 | Colston Loveland | 515 | 523 | +8 | 0.53 points/game more over replacement |
| 4 | Tyler Warren | 463 | 458 | -5 | 0.31 points/game less over replacement |
| 5 | Tucker Kraft | 330 | 339 | +9 | 0.83 points/game more over replacement |
| 6 | Sam LaPorta | 315 | 313 | -2 | 0.18 points/game less over replacement |
| 7 | Harold Fannin | 290 | 287 | -3 | 0.34 points/game less over replacement |
| 8 | Kyle Pitts | 261 | 261 | 0 | 0.03 points/game more over replacement |
| 9 | Dalton Kincaid | 203 | 207 | +4 | 0.66 points/game more over replacement |
| 10 | Isaiah Likely | 186 | 197 | +11 | 2.23 points/game more over replacement |
| 11 | George Kittle | 199 | 195 | -4 | 1.02 points/game less over replacement |
| 12 | Terrance Ferguson | 166 | 181 | +15 | 3.37 points/game more over replacement |
| 13 | Jake Ferguson | 172 | 170 | -2 | 0.38 points/game less over replacement |
| 14 | Dallas Goedert | 158 | 158 | 0 | 0.07 points/game more over replacement |
| 15 | AJ Barner | 149 | 154 | +5 | 1.10 points/game more over replacement |
| 16 | Brenton Strange | 149 | 150 | +1 | 0.33 points/game more over replacement |
| 17 | Juwan Johnson | 149 | 147 | -2 | 0.37 points/game less over replacement |
| 18 | Michael Mayer | 138 | 146 | +8 | 1.82 points/game more over replacement |
| 19 | Chig Okonkwo | 138 | 142 | +4 | 0.95 points/game more over replacement |
| 20 | Oronde Gadsden | 137 | 140 | +3 | 0.89 points/game more over replacement |
| 21 | Gunnar Helm | 120 | 125 | +5 | 1.41 points/game more over replacement |
| 22 | Greg Dulcich | 103 | 110 | +7 | 2.30 points/game more over replacement |
| 23 | Cade Otton | 100 | 101 | +1 | 0.47 points/game more over replacement |
| 24 | Darren Waller | 80 | 82 | +2 | 1.49 points/game more over replacement |
Biggest fallers
How to read these values.
Do tight ends matter less in Standard scoring?
Reception volume receives less raw reward, but a scarce elite tight end can still create a meaningful advantage over positional replacement.
Is this a tight end premium ranking?
No. It removes ordinary reception points and applies no separate TEP bonus. Use the lab for a premium market.
Do tight end touchdowns still count?
Yes. Receiving touchdowns remain worth six points and receiving yards retain their normal value.
Why can a low-volume tight end rise?
If the player loses fewer reception points than the replacement tight end, his relative advantage can improve.
Change FLEX spots, starters, format, or scoring in the lab.
Values use market release ftt-20260910T232215Z, updated September 10, 2026. Market source: Tradyr public API. Scoring adjustments are deterministic and documented in the published methodology.






