Biggest risers
No players move in this direction.
Rank tight ends for a 12-team redraft Standard league. Every value starts with the current market and changes only when the player’s scoring profile separates from same-position replacement.
Standard Redraft Tight End Rankings should answer a league-specific question, not paste a generic list under a new label. This board uses the redraft market, 12 teams, 1QB roster demand, Standard reception rules. The value change is measured against the replacement option at the same position, so the table shows where this exact setup produces a real difference.
Values price the current season rather than long-term age and resale value.
Receptions score zero points; receiving yards and touchdowns still count.
One starting quarterback keeps the replacement tier closer to the starters.
Starter demand and exact rookie-pick availability are calculated for 12 teams rather than borrowed from a 12-team board.
Each tight end is measured against the replacement option created by this lineup.
4-point passing TD · Standard · 12 teams · 1 FLEX
| Rank | Player | Base | League value | Change | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Trey McBride | 556 | 556 | 0 | 0.00 points/game the same over replacement |
| 2 | Brock Bowers | 416 | 416 | 0 | 0.00 points/game the same over replacement |
| 3 | Colston Loveland | 394 | 394 | 0 | 0.00 points/game the same over replacement |
| 4 | Tyler Warren | 338 | 338 | 0 | 0.00 points/game the same over replacement |
| 5 | Tucker Kraft | 220 | 220 | 0 | 0.00 points/game the same over replacement |
| 6 | Sam LaPorta | 209 | 209 | 0 | 0.00 points/game the same over replacement |
| 7 | Kyle Pitts | 163 | 163 | 0 | 0.00 points/game the same over replacement |
| 8 | George Kittle | 145 | 145 | 0 | 0.00 points/game the same over replacement |
| 9 | Harold Fannin | 122 | 122 | 0 | 0.00 points/game the same over replacement |
| 10 | Dalton Kincaid | 88 | 88 | 0 | 0.00 points/game the same over replacement |
| 11 | Isaiah Likely | 86 | 86 | 0 | 0.00 points/game the same over replacement |
| 12 | Dallas Goedert | 68 | 68 | 0 | 0.00 points/game the same over replacement |
| 13 | Jake Ferguson | 67 | 67 | 0 | 0.00 points/game the same over replacement |
| 14 | Juwan Johnson | 50 | 50 | 0 | 0.00 points/game the same over replacement |
| 15 | Michael Mayer | 37 | 37 | 0 | 0.00 points/game the same over replacement |
| 16 | Brenton Strange | 22 | 22 | 0 | 0.00 points/game the same over replacement |
| 17 | Chig Okonkwo | 15 | 15 | 0 | 0.00 points/game the same over replacement |
| 18 | Oronde Gadsden | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0.00 points/game the same over replacement |
| 19 | AJ Barner | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0.00 points/game the same over replacement |
| 20 | Terrance Ferguson | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 points/game the same over replacement |
| 21 | Cade Otton | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 points/game the same over replacement |
No players move in this direction.
No players move in this direction.
The live table above is the current answer. It combines the validated redraft market with Standard scoring over replacement and changes when a new market release is published.
The board uses Standard reception scoring, 1QB quarterback demand. Those settings can change both replacement and the price gap between players.
No. These are current trade values adjusted with recorded production and positional replacement. They do not predict this week’s touches, touchdowns, injuries, or coaching decisions.
Yes. Open the scoring-impact lab to change league size, quarterback demand, dedicated starters, FLEX depth, reception scoring, and passing-touchdown points.
Values use market release ftt-20260913T165752Z, updated September 13, 2026. Market source: Tradyr public API. Scoring adjustments are deterministic and documented in the published methodology.