Scoring research // redraft tight end
PPR redraft tight end rankings.
Rank tight ends for a 12-team redraft PPR league. Every value starts with the current market and changes only when the player’s scoring profile separates from same-position replacement.
Full PPR scoring4-point passing TDs12 teams · 1 FLEXRelease ftt-20261006T185416Z
What changes
The scoring context behind the list.
PPR Redraft Tight End Rankings should answer a league-specific question, not paste a generic list under a new label. This board uses the redraft market, 12 teams, 1QB roster demand, PPR reception rules. The value change is measured against the replacement option at the same position, so the table shows where this exact setup produces a real difference.
Redraft market
Values price the current season rather than long-term age and resale value.
PPR
Every reception adds one fantasy point.
1QB
One starting quarterback keeps the replacement tier closer to the starters.
12-team league
Starter demand and exact rookie-pick availability are calculated for 12 teams rather than borrowed from a 12-team board.
tight end replacement
Each tight end is measured against the replacement option created by this lineup.
Current values
Top TE assets
4-point passing TD · Full PPR · 12 teams · 1 FLEX
| Rank | Player | Base | League value | Change | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Trey McBride TE · ARI | 526 | 629 | +103 | 2.44 points/game more over replacement |
| 2 | Brock Bowers TE · LV | 533 | 592 | +59 | 1.38 points/game more over replacement |
| 3 | George Kittle TE · SF | 260 | 270 | +10 | 0.78 points/game more over replacement |
| 4 | Tyler Warren TE · IND | 198 | 199 | +1 | 0.07 points/game more over replacement |
| 5 | Sam LaPorta TE · DET | 147 | 146 | -1 | 0.06 points/game less over replacement |
| 6 | Dalton Kincaid TE · BUF | 149 | 138 | -11 | 0.90 points/game less over replacement |
| 7 | Colston Loveland TE · CHI | 119 | 112 | -7 | 0.78 points/game less over replacement |
| 8 | Harold Fannin TE · CLE | 103 | 104 | +1 | 0.10 points/game more over replacement |
| 9 | Tucker Kraft TE · GB | 111 | 102 | -9 | 1.07 points/game less over replacement |
| 10 | Juwan Johnson TE · NO | 98 | 99 | +1 | 0.13 points/game more over replacement |
| 11 | Isaiah Likely TE · NYG | 81 | 68 | -13 | 2.47 points/game less over replacement |
| 12 | Jake Ferguson TE · DAL | 47 | 48 | +1 | 0.14 points/game more over replacement |
| 13 | Kyle Pitts TE · ATL | 47 | 46 | -1 | 0.28 points/game less over replacement |
| 14 | Darren Waller TE · CAR | 39 | 36 | -3 | 1.73 points/game less over replacement |
| 15 | Dallas Goedert TE · PHI | 33 | 32 | -1 | 0.31 points/game less over replacement |
| 16 | Brenton Strange TE · JAX | 14 | 14 | 0 | 0.57 points/game less over replacement |
| 17 | AJ Barner TE · SEA | 4 | 4 | 0 | 1.34 points/game less over replacement |
| 18 | Oronde Gadsden TE · LAC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1.13 points/game less over replacement |
| 19 | Pat Freiermuth TE · PIT | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1.53 points/game less over replacement |
Biggest fallers
How to read these values.
Who leads these ppr redraft tight end rankings?
The live table above is the current answer. It combines the validated redraft market with PPR scoring over replacement and changes when a new market release is published.
How is this different from a generic redraft ranking?
The board uses PPR reception scoring, 1QB quarterback demand. Those settings can change both replacement and the price gap between players.
Are these weekly projections?
No. These are current trade values adjusted with recorded production and positional replacement. They do not predict this week’s touches, touchdowns, injuries, or coaching decisions.
Can I change the roster settings?
Yes. Open the scoring-impact lab to change league size, quarterback demand, dedicated starters, FLEX depth, reception scoring, and passing-touchdown points.
Use your exact lineup
Open impact lab →Change FLEX spots, starters, format, or scoring in the lab.
Values use market release ftt-20261006T185416Z, updated October 6, 2026. Market source: Tradyr public API. Scoring adjustments are deterministic and documented in the published methodology.