Half PPR redraft tight end rankings.
Rank tight ends for a 12-team redraft Half PPR league. Every value starts with the current market and changes only when the player’s scoring profile separates from same-position replacement.
The scoring context behind the list.
Half PPR Redraft Tight End Rankings should answer a league-specific question, not paste a generic list under a new label. This board uses the redraft market, 12 teams, 1QB roster demand, Half PPR reception rules. The value change is measured against the replacement option at the same position, so the table shows where this exact setup produces a real difference.
Values price the current season rather than long-term age and resale value.
Every reception adds 0.5 fantasy points.
One starting quarterback keeps the replacement tier closer to the starters.
Starter demand and exact rookie-pick availability are calculated for 12 teams rather than borrowed from a 12-team board.
Each tight end is measured against the replacement option created by this lineup.
Top TE assets
4-point passing TD · Half PPR · 12 teams · 1 FLEX
| Rank | Player | Base | League value | Change | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Trey McBride | 556 | 625 | +69 | 1.67 points/game more over replacement |
| 2 | Brock Bowers | 416 | 451 | +35 | 1.14 points/game more over replacement |
| 3 | Colston Loveland | 394 | 396 | +2 | 0.06 points/game more over replacement |
| 4 | Tyler Warren | 338 | 350 | +12 | 0.48 points/game more over replacement |
| 5 | Tucker Kraft | 220 | 219 | -1 | 0.09 points/game less over replacement |
| 6 | Sam LaPorta | 209 | 216 | +7 | 0.42 points/game more over replacement |
| 7 | Kyle Pitts | 163 | 167 | +4 | 0.31 points/game more over replacement |
| 8 | George Kittle | 145 | 151 | +6 | 0.84 points/game more over replacement |
| 9 | Harold Fannin | 122 | 126 | +4 | 0.50 points/game more over replacement |
| 10 | Dalton Kincaid | 88 | 88 | 0 | 0.00 points/game the same over replacement |
| 11 | Isaiah Likely | 86 | 82 | -4 | 0.79 points/game less over replacement |
| 12 | Dallas Goedert | 68 | 70 | +2 | 0.30 points/game more over replacement |
| 13 | Jake Ferguson | 67 | 70 | +3 | 0.52 points/game more over replacement |
| 14 | Juwan Johnson | 50 | 52 | +2 | 0.51 points/game more over replacement |
| 15 | Michael Mayer | 37 | 35 | -2 | 0.58 points/game less over replacement |
| 16 | Brenton Strange | 22 | 22 | 0 | 0.17 points/game more over replacement |
| 17 | Chig Okonkwo | 15 | 15 | 0 | 0.15 points/game less over replacement |
| 18 | Oronde Gadsden | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0.12 points/game less over replacement |
| 19 | AJ Barner | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0.22 points/game less over replacement |
| 20 | Terrance Ferguson | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1.36 points/game less over replacement |
| 21 | Cade Otton | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.09 points/game more over replacement |
Biggest fallers
How to read these values.
Who leads these half ppr redraft tight end rankings?
The live table above is the current answer. It combines the validated redraft market with Half PPR scoring over replacement and changes when a new market release is published.
How is this different from a generic redraft ranking?
The board uses Half PPR reception scoring, 1QB quarterback demand. Those settings can change both replacement and the price gap between players.
Are these weekly projections?
No. These are current trade values adjusted with recorded production and positional replacement. They do not predict this week’s touches, touchdowns, injuries, or coaching decisions.
Can I change the roster settings?
Yes. Open the scoring-impact lab to change league size, quarterback demand, dedicated starters, FLEX depth, reception scoring, and passing-touchdown points.
Change FLEX spots, starters, format, or scoring in the lab.
Values use market release ftt-20260913T165752Z, updated September 13, 2026. Market source: Tradyr public API. Scoring adjustments are deterministic and documented in the published methodology.
















