Half PPR tight end rankings.
Current dynasty tight end values for Half PPR leagues. Each adjustment measures the player’s reception change against the tight end replacement line.
The scoring context behind the list.
Half PPR reduces the catch premium while leaving tight end scarcity intact. The result can separate players with similar market values when their reception production differs meaningfully from the replacement option.
Each tight end reception scores 0.5 points.
No extra tight end premium is applied on this page.
One dedicated tight end starter per team establishes the positional comparison.
Every adjustment begins with the validated dynasty market release.
Top TE assets
4-point passing TD · Half PPR · 12 teams · 1 FLEX
| Rank | Player | Base | League value | Change | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brock Bowers | 789 | 814 | +25 | 0.70 points/game more over replacement |
| 2 | Trey McBride | 691 | 730 | +39 | 1.23 points/game more over replacement |
| 3 | Tyler Warren | 476 | 477 | +1 | 0.04 points/game more over replacement |
| 4 | Colston Loveland | 442 | 435 | -7 | 0.38 points/game less over replacement |
| 5 | Harold Fannin | 388 | 389 | +1 | 0.06 points/game more over replacement |
| 6 | Sam LaPorta | 370 | 370 | 0 | 0.02 points/game less over replacement |
| 7 | Tucker Kraft | 370 | 361 | -9 | 0.53 points/game less over replacement |
| 8 | George Kittle | 311 | 315 | +4 | 0.40 points/game more over replacement |
| 9 | Dalton Kincaid | 318 | 312 | -6 | 0.44 points/game less over replacement |
| 10 | Isaiah Likely | 294 | 280 | -14 | 1.23 points/game less over replacement |
| 11 | Kyle Pitts | 241 | 240 | -1 | 0.13 points/game less over replacement |
| 12 | Juwan Johnson | 227 | 228 | +1 | 0.07 points/game more over replacement |
| 13 | Terrance Ferguson | 237 | 221 | -16 | 1.80 points/game less over replacement |
| 14 | Jake Ferguson | 211 | 212 | +1 | 0.08 points/game more over replacement |
| 15 | Brenton Strange | 210 | 208 | -2 | 0.27 points/game less over replacement |
| 16 | Oronde Gadsden | 194 | 190 | -4 | 0.56 points/game less over replacement |
| 17 | Michael Mayer | 195 | 186 | -9 | 1.02 points/game less over replacement |
| 18 | Dallas Goedert | 186 | 185 | -1 | 0.14 points/game less over replacement |
| 19 | AJ Barner | 172 | 167 | -5 | 0.66 points/game less over replacement |
| 20 | Pat Freiermuth | 163 | 157 | -6 | 0.75 points/game less over replacement |
| 21 | Gunnar Helm | 137 | 132 | -5 | 0.82 points/game less over replacement |
| 22 | Chig Okonkwo | 130 | 127 | -3 | 0.59 points/game less over replacement |
| 23 | Cade Otton | 129 | 127 | -2 | 0.35 points/game less over replacement |
| 24 | Darren Waller | 128 | 125 | -3 | 0.86 points/game less over replacement |
Biggest fallers
How to read these values.
Who are the best tight ends in Half PPR dynasty?
The current ranking above combines market price with Half PPR production over replacement and updates with each validated release.
How is Half PPR different from tight end premium?
Half PPR awards 0.5 points to every reception for every position. TEP adds a separate bonus specifically for tight ends.
Does reception volume still matter at tight end?
Yes, but each catch is worth half as much as in Full PPR. Relative value depends on how the player’s volume compares with replacement.
Can two-TE leagues use this page?
Use it as a starting point, then open the scoring-impact lab and select two dedicated tight end starters to deepen replacement.
Change FLEX spots, starters, format, or scoring in the lab.
Values use market release ftt-20261011T112344Z, updated October 11, 2026. Market source: Tradyr public API. Scoring adjustments are deterministic and documented in the published methodology.



















