Dynasty Superflex baseline
Rashee Rice
KC · WR17 · age 26.4
365#47 overall
Head-to-head // WRRelease ftt-20260913T165752Z
Rashee Rice or Zay Flowers: who has more dynasty value?
The short answer
Rashee Rice and Zay Flowers are in the same current dynasty Superflex tier: 365 versus 363, a 0.5% gap.
These receivers begin in nearly the same dynasty range, so reception scoring and current-season value can produce the actionable difference. The page measures each profile against WR replacement instead of awarding a generic PPR label.
Dynasty Superflex baseline
Zay Flowers
BAL · WR18 · age 26
363#48 overall
Same players // four markets
What changes in Superflex, 1QB, TEP, and redraft?
These rows change one major market context at a time. Hover or focus the dotted labels for a plain-language definition. Values share one 0–1,000 composite scale.
| League setting | Rashee Rice | Zay Flowers | Current answer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dynasty Superflex ⓘTwo QB-eligible starting slots; 4-point passing TDs and Standard scoring. | 365 | 363 | Same tier |
| Dynasty 1QB ⓘOne starting quarterback; 4-point passing TDs and Standard scoring. | 339 | 340 | Same tier |
| Superflex TEP ⓘSuperflex with an additional tight end reception premium. | 365 | 363 | Same tier |
| Redraft 1QB ⓘCurrent-season value only; one quarterback and Standard scoring. | 371 | 369 | Same tier |
Format verdict // The leader changes across formats. There is no defensible format-free winner; use the row that matches your league.
Reception scoring // player-level
Does standard, half PPR, or full PPR change it?
PPR means points per reception: zero in standard, 0.5 in half PPR, and one in full PPR. Each adjustment is measured relative to a same-position replacement player.
| League setting | Rashee Rice | Zay Flowers | Current answer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard ⓘReceptions score zero points; yards and touchdowns still score normally. | 365 | 363 | Same tier |
| Half PPR ⓘEach reception scores 0.5 points. | 390 | 379 | Same tier |
| Full PPR ⓘEach reception scores one point. | 404 | 391 | Same tier |
Scoring verdict: No leader flip appears in the displayed scoring settings. The gap ranges from 2 to 13 value points, so scoring can still change the price.
Observed production // 2025
The evidence underneath the market answer.
These are descriptive season results, not projections. Missing upstream fields remain visibly unavailable instead of being guessed.
Rashee Rice
WR17- Fantasy points/game
- 9.4
- Consistency grade
- A+
- Targets/game
- 4.9
- Receptions/game
- 3.3
- Receiving yards/game
- 35.7
- Catch rate
- 67.9%
Zay Flowers
WR18- Fantasy points/game
- 14.3
- Consistency grade
- B
- Targets/game
- 6.9
- Receptions/game
- 5.1
- Receiving yards/game
- 71.2
- Catch rate
- 72.9%
Decision rule
Treat the gap like a tiebreaker.
Use the exact reception row to break a close market tie and inspect redraft separately before a contender adds anything beyond the measured gap.
Yes, the current baseline supports treating Rashee Rice and Zay Flowers as straight-up trade peers. A manager can still prefer either side, but the model does not support a large automatic add. Injury status, starting-lineup need, and manager-specific preference are outside this model.
Direct answers
Comparison FAQ
Who is worth more in dynasty: Rashee Rice or Zay Flowers?
Rashee Rice and Zay Flowers are in the same current dynasty Superflex tier: 365 versus 363, a 0.5% gap.
Should I trade Rashee Rice for Zay Flowers straight up?
Yes, the current baseline supports treating Rashee Rice and Zay Flowers as straight-up trade peers. A manager can still prefer either side, but the model does not support a large automatic add.
Does scoring change the Rashee Rice vs. Zay Flowers comparison?
No leader flip appears in the displayed scoring settings. The gap ranges from 2 to 13 value points, so scoring can still change the price.
Why do Superflex and 1QB values differ?
Quarterback scarcity changes enough across the displayed formats to change which side leads. Use the row matching your league rather than the universal baseline.
Same-position decisions