Dynasty Superflex baseline
Parker Washington
JAX · WR18 · age 24.5
308#55 overall
Head-to-head // WRRelease ftt-20260922T233554Z
Parker Washington or Jameson Williams: who has more dynasty value?
The short answer
Parker Washington is currently worth more than Jameson Williams in dynasty Superflex: 308 versus 224, a 27.3% gap.
Washington reached 12 targets and an 81% snap share in Week 2, bringing his market price close to Williams. The comparison tests whether the observed role growth is already reflected in dynasty value and how the answer changes in redraft and PPR formats.
Dynasty Superflex baseline
Jameson Williams
DET · WR29 · age 25.5
224#85 overall
Latest usage // through Week 2
What changed on the field?
Recent workload and listed availability add context to the market price. They describe what happened; they do not predict the next game.
Week 2 · vs. DEN
Parker Washington
- PPR points
- 16.8 Latest game
- Targets
- 12 +6 from the prior recorded week
- Snap share
- 81% Latest game
Listed availability: Active.
See the Week 2 WR usage report →Week 2 · vs. BUF
Jameson Williams
- PPR points
- 5.3 Latest game
- Targets
- 4 -5 from the prior recorded week
- Snap share
- 97% Latest game
Listed availability: Active.
See the Week 2 WR usage report →Same players // four markets
What changes in Superflex, 1QB, TEP, and redraft?
These rows change one major market context at a time. Hover or focus the dotted labels for a plain-language definition. Values share one 0–1,000 composite scale.
| League setting | Parker Washington | Jameson Williams | Current answer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dynasty Superflex ⓘTwo QB-eligible starting slots; 4-point passing TDs and Standard scoring. | 308 | 224 | Parker Washington +84 |
| Dynasty 1QB ⓘOne starting quarterback; 4-point passing TDs and Standard scoring. | 303 | 221 | Parker Washington +82 |
| Superflex TEP ⓘSuperflex with an additional tight end reception premium. | 308 | 224 | Parker Washington +84 |
| Redraft 1QB ⓘCurrent-season value only; one quarterback and Standard scoring. | 287 | 131 | Parker Washington +156 |
Format verdict // The same player leads all four markets, but the gap ranges from 82 to 156 points. Format still changes the price.
Reception scoring // player-level
Does standard, half PPR, or full PPR change it?
PPR means points per reception: zero in standard, 0.5 in half PPR, and one in full PPR. Each adjustment is measured relative to a same-position replacement player.
| League setting | Parker Washington | Jameson Williams | Current answer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard ⓘReceptions score zero points; yards and touchdowns still score normally. | 308 | 224 | Parker Washington +84 |
| Half PPR ⓘEach reception scores 0.5 points. | 309 | 228 | Parker Washington +81 |
| Full PPR ⓘEach reception scores one point. | 310 | 233 | Parker Washington +77 |
Scoring verdict: No leader flip appears in the displayed scoring settings. The gap ranges from 77 to 84 value points, so scoring can still change the price.
Observed production // 2025
The evidence underneath the market answer.
These are descriptive season results, not projections. Missing upstream fields remain visibly unavailable instead of being guessed.
Parker Washington
WR18- Fantasy points/game
- 11.5
- Consistency grade
- D
- Targets/game
- 5.9
- Receptions/game
- 3.6
- Receiving yards/game
- 52.9
- Catch rate
- 61.1%
Jameson Williams
WR29- Fantasy points/game
- 12.9
- Consistency grade
- B
- Targets/game
- 6
- Receptions/game
- 3.8
- Receiving yards/game
- 65.7
- Catch rate
- 63.7%
Decision rule
Start with Parker Washington's edge.
Reward repeatable opportunity rather than one result, and keep the trade price tied to the current format row while the new role develops.
Not at the baseline price. Parker Washington holds the larger current value, so a straight swap gives up a 27.3% market edge before roster fit is considered. Recent usage and listed availability provide context, but starting-lineup need and manager-specific preference remain outside the model.
Direct answers
Comparison FAQ
Who is worth more in dynasty: Parker Washington or Jameson Williams?
Parker Washington is currently worth more than Jameson Williams in dynasty Superflex: 308 versus 224, a 27.3% gap.
Should I trade Parker Washington for Jameson Williams straight up?
Not at the baseline price. Parker Washington holds the larger current value, so a straight swap gives up a 27.3% market edge before roster fit is considered.
Does scoring change the Parker Washington vs. Jameson Williams comparison?
No leader flip appears in the displayed scoring settings. The gap ranges from 77 to 84 value points, so scoring can still change the price.
Why do Superflex and 1QB values differ?
Superflex makes starting quarterbacks scarcer, while 1QB pushes replacement closer to the starters. The displayed format gap ranges from 82 to 156 value points.
Same-position decisions