Dynasty Superflex baseline
Matthew Golden
GB · WR37 · age 23.1
201#101 overall
Head-to-head // WRRelease ftt-20260913T165752Z
Matthew Golden or Jordan Addison: who has more dynasty value?
The short answer
Matthew Golden and Jordan Addison are in the same current dynasty Superflex tier: 201 versus 197, a 2.0% gap.
These similarly priced receivers create a useful choice between different career stages and current roles. The comparison uses measured reception scoring over WR replacement and a separate redraft market, without inventing future target shares.
Dynasty Superflex baseline
Jordan Addison
MIN · WR39 · age 24.6
197#106 overall
Same players // four markets
What changes in Superflex, 1QB, TEP, and redraft?
These rows change one major market context at a time. Hover or focus the dotted labels for a plain-language definition. Values share one 0–1,000 composite scale.
| League setting | Matthew Golden | Jordan Addison | Current answer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dynasty Superflex ⓘTwo QB-eligible starting slots; 4-point passing TDs and Standard scoring. | 201 | 197 | Same tier |
| Dynasty 1QB ⓘOne starting quarterback; 4-point passing TDs and Standard scoring. | 187 | 182 | Same tier |
| Superflex TEP ⓘSuperflex with an additional tight end reception premium. | 201 | 197 | Same tier |
| Redraft 1QB ⓘCurrent-season value only; one quarterback and Standard scoring. | 57 | 73 | Jordan Addison +16 |
Format verdict // The leader changes across formats. There is no defensible format-free winner; use the row that matches your league.
Reception scoring // player-level
Does standard, half PPR, or full PPR change it?
PPR means points per reception: zero in standard, 0.5 in half PPR, and one in full PPR. Each adjustment is measured relative to a same-position replacement player.
| League setting | Matthew Golden | Jordan Addison | Current answer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard ⓘReceptions score zero points; yards and touchdowns still score normally. | 201 | 197 | Same tier |
| Half PPR ⓘEach reception scores 0.5 points. | 198 | 200 | Same tier |
| Full PPR ⓘEach reception scores one point. | 193 | 201 | Same tier |
Scoring verdict: Yes. The higher-valued side changes across the displayed scoring settings, so this league setting can change the answer.
Observed production // 2025
The evidence underneath the market answer.
These are descriptive season results, not projections. Missing upstream fields remain visibly unavailable instead of being guessed.
Matthew Golden
WR37- Fantasy points/game
- 5
- Consistency grade
- F
- Targets/game
- 3.1
- Receptions/game
- 2.1
- Receiving yards/game
- 25.8
- Catch rate
- 65.9%
Jordan Addison
WR39- Fantasy points/game
- 7.9
- Consistency grade
- F
- Targets/game
- 4.6
- Receptions/game
- 2.5
- Receiving yards/game
- 35.9
- Catch rate
- 53.2%
Decision rule
Treat the gap like a tiebreaker.
Let the roster window choose dynasty or redraft, then use the actual PPR setting as the tiebreaker when the baseline remains close.
Yes, the current baseline supports treating Matthew Golden and Jordan Addison as straight-up trade peers. A manager can still prefer either side, but the model does not support a large automatic add. Injury status, starting-lineup need, and manager-specific preference are outside this model.
Direct answers
Comparison FAQ
Who is worth more in dynasty: Matthew Golden or Jordan Addison?
Matthew Golden and Jordan Addison are in the same current dynasty Superflex tier: 201 versus 197, a 2.0% gap.
Should I trade Matthew Golden for Jordan Addison straight up?
Yes, the current baseline supports treating Matthew Golden and Jordan Addison as straight-up trade peers. A manager can still prefer either side, but the model does not support a large automatic add.
Does scoring change the Matthew Golden vs. Jordan Addison comparison?
Yes. The higher-valued side changes across the displayed scoring settings, so this league setting can change the answer.
Why do Superflex and 1QB values differ?
Quarterback scarcity changes enough across the displayed formats to change which side leads. Use the row matching your league rather than the universal baseline.
Same-position decisions