Dynasty Superflex baseline
Jahmyr Gibbs
DET · RB2 · age 24.5
963#3 overall
Head-to-head // RBRelease ftt-20260913T165752Z
Jahmyr Gibbs or Ashton Jeanty: who has more dynasty value?
The short answer
Jahmyr Gibbs is currently worth more than Ashton Jeanty in dynasty Superflex: 963 versus 598, a 37.9% gap.
Two elite dynasty running backs create a high-stakes comparison where even a modest percentage gap can equal a useful pick. The page shows the market baseline plus Standard, Half PPR, Full PPR, and current-season redraft answers.
Dynasty Superflex baseline
Ashton Jeanty
LV · RB4 · age 22.8
598#19 overall
Same players // four markets
What changes in Superflex, 1QB, TEP, and redraft?
These rows change one major market context at a time. Hover or focus the dotted labels for a plain-language definition. Values share one 0–1,000 composite scale.
| League setting | Jahmyr Gibbs | Ashton Jeanty | Current answer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dynasty Superflex ⓘTwo QB-eligible starting slots; 4-point passing TDs and Standard scoring. | 963 | 598 | Jahmyr Gibbs +365 |
| Dynasty 1QB ⓘOne starting quarterback; 4-point passing TDs and Standard scoring. | 977 | 598 | Jahmyr Gibbs +379 |
| Superflex TEP ⓘSuperflex with an additional tight end reception premium. | 963 | 598 | Jahmyr Gibbs +365 |
| Redraft 1QB ⓘCurrent-season value only; one quarterback and Standard scoring. | 1000 | 576 | Jahmyr Gibbs +424 |
Format verdict // The same player leads all four markets, but the gap ranges from 365 to 424 points. Format still changes the price.
Reception scoring // player-level
Does standard, half PPR, or full PPR change it?
PPR means points per reception: zero in standard, 0.5 in half PPR, and one in full PPR. Each adjustment is measured relative to a same-position replacement player.
| League setting | Jahmyr Gibbs | Ashton Jeanty | Current answer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard ⓘReceptions score zero points; yards and touchdowns still score normally. | 963 | 598 | Jahmyr Gibbs +365 |
| Half PPR ⓘEach reception scores 0.5 points. | 976 | 601 | Jahmyr Gibbs +375 |
| Full PPR ⓘEach reception scores one point. | 988 | 604 | Jahmyr Gibbs +384 |
Scoring verdict: No leader flip appears in the displayed scoring settings. The gap ranges from 365 to 384 value points, so scoring can still change the price.
Observed production // 2025
The evidence underneath the market answer.
These are descriptive season results, not projections. Missing upstream fields remain visibly unavailable instead of being guessed.
Jahmyr Gibbs
RB2- Fantasy points/game
- 21.6
- Consistency grade
- A
- Rush yards/game
- 71.9
- Carries/game
- 14.3
- Receptions/game
- 4.5
- Total TD/game
- 1.1
Ashton Jeanty
RB4- Fantasy points/game
- 14.4
- Consistency grade
- C
- Rush yards/game
- 57.4
- Carries/game
- 15.6
- Receptions/game
- 3.2
- Total TD/game
- 0.6
Decision rule
Start with Jahmyr Gibbs's edge.
Use percentage gap and tier context before attaching a pick, and verify that the premium survives the scoring format your league actually uses.
Not at the baseline price. Jahmyr Gibbs holds the larger current value, so a straight swap gives up a 37.9% market edge before roster fit is considered. Injury status, starting-lineup need, and manager-specific preference are outside this model.
Direct answers
Comparison FAQ
Who is worth more in dynasty: Jahmyr Gibbs or Ashton Jeanty?
Jahmyr Gibbs is currently worth more than Ashton Jeanty in dynasty Superflex: 963 versus 598, a 37.9% gap.
Should I trade Jahmyr Gibbs for Ashton Jeanty straight up?
Not at the baseline price. Jahmyr Gibbs holds the larger current value, so a straight swap gives up a 37.9% market edge before roster fit is considered.
Does scoring change the Jahmyr Gibbs vs. Ashton Jeanty comparison?
No leader flip appears in the displayed scoring settings. The gap ranges from 365 to 384 value points, so scoring can still change the price.
Why do Superflex and 1QB values differ?
Superflex makes starting quarterbacks scarcer, while 1QB pushes replacement closer to the starters. The displayed format gap ranges from 365 to 424 value points.
Same-position decisions