Dynasty Superflex baseline
CeeDee Lamb
DAL · WR5 · age 27.5
695#10 overall
Head-to-head // WRRelease ftt-20261006T185416Z
CeeDee Lamb or Malik Nabers: who has more dynasty value?
The short answer
CeeDee Lamb is currently worth more than Malik Nabers in dynasty Superflex: 695 versus 583, a 16.1% gap.
This top-tier receiver comparison measures an established elite market against a younger premium asset. Reception scoring and redraft context can move the price, but the current dynasty composite remains the transparent starting point.
Dynasty Superflex baseline
Malik Nabers
NYG · WR9 · age 23.2
583#25 overall
Latest usage // through Week 4
What changed on the field?
Recent workload and listed availability add context to the market price. They describe what happened; they do not predict the next game.
Week 4 · vs. HOU
CeeDee Lamb
- PPR points
- 41.3 Latest game
- Targets
- 21 +13 from the prior recorded week
- Snap share
- 86% Latest game
Listed availability: Active.
See the Week 4 WR usage report →Week 4 · vs. ARI
Malik Nabers
- PPR points
- 23.2 Latest game
- Targets
- 7 +1 from the prior recorded week
- Snap share
- 76% Latest game
Listed availability: Week 3: Full · Shoulder.
See the Week 4 WR usage report →Same players // four markets
What changes in Superflex, 1QB, TEP, and redraft?
These rows change one major market context at a time. Hover or focus the dotted labels for a plain-language definition. Values share one 0–1,000 composite scale.
| League setting | CeeDee Lamb | Malik Nabers | Current answer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dynasty Superflex ⓘTwo QB-eligible starting slots; 4-point passing TDs and Standard scoring. | 695 | 583 | CeeDee Lamb +112 |
| Dynasty 1QB ⓘOne starting quarterback; 4-point passing TDs and Standard scoring. | 685 | 592 | CeeDee Lamb +93 |
| Superflex TEP ⓘSuperflex with an additional tight end reception premium. | 693 | 583 | CeeDee Lamb +110 |
| Redraft 1QB ⓘCurrent-season value only; one quarterback and Standard scoring. | 787 | 355 | CeeDee Lamb +432 |
Format verdict // The same player leads all four markets, but the gap ranges from 93 to 432 points. Format still changes the price.
Reception scoring // player-level
Does standard, half PPR, or full PPR change it?
PPR means points per reception: zero in standard, 0.5 in half PPR, and one in full PPR. Each adjustment is measured relative to a same-position replacement player.
| League setting | CeeDee Lamb | Malik Nabers | Current answer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard ⓘReceptions score zero points; yards and touchdowns still score normally. | 695 | 583 | CeeDee Lamb +112 |
| Half PPR ⓘEach reception scores 0.5 points. | 741 | 608 | CeeDee Lamb +133 |
| Full PPR ⓘEach reception scores one point. | 778 | 633 | CeeDee Lamb +145 |
Scoring verdict: No leader flip appears in the displayed scoring settings. The gap ranges from 112 to 145 value points, so scoring can still change the price.
Observed production // 2025
The evidence underneath the market answer.
These are descriptive season results, not projections. Missing upstream fields remain visibly unavailable instead of being guessed.
CeeDee Lamb
WR5- Fantasy points/game
- 14.3
- Consistency grade
- B
- Targets/game
- 8.4
- Receptions/game
- 5.4
- Receiving yards/game
- 76.9
- Catch rate
- 64.1%
Malik Nabers
WR9- Fantasy points/game
- 3.4
- Consistency grade
- C
- Targets/game
- 2.1
- Receptions/game
- 1.1
- Receiving yards/game
- 15.9
- Catch rate
- 51.4%
Decision rule
Start with CeeDee Lamb's edge.
Treat a small top-tier difference as negotiable, but do not ignore a clear current market gap simply because both players belong in elite lineups.
Not at the baseline price. CeeDee Lamb holds the larger current value, so a straight swap gives up a 16.1% market edge before roster fit is considered. Recent usage and listed availability provide context, but starting-lineup need and manager-specific preference remain outside the model.
Direct answers
Comparison FAQ
Who is worth more in dynasty: CeeDee Lamb or Malik Nabers?
CeeDee Lamb is currently worth more than Malik Nabers in dynasty Superflex: 695 versus 583, a 16.1% gap.
Should I trade CeeDee Lamb for Malik Nabers straight up?
Not at the baseline price. CeeDee Lamb holds the larger current value, so a straight swap gives up a 16.1% market edge before roster fit is considered.
Does scoring change the CeeDee Lamb vs. Malik Nabers comparison?
No leader flip appears in the displayed scoring settings. The gap ranges from 112 to 145 value points, so scoring can still change the price.
Why do Superflex and 1QB values differ?
Superflex makes starting quarterbacks scarcer, while 1QB pushes replacement closer to the starters. The displayed format gap ranges from 93 to 432 value points.
Same-position decisions