Dynasty Superflex baseline
CeeDee Lamb
DAL · WR7 · age 27.4
607#18 overall
Head-to-head // WRRelease ftt-20260913T165752Z
CeeDee Lamb or Malik Nabers: who has more dynasty value?
The short answer
CeeDee Lamb and Malik Nabers are in the same current dynasty Superflex tier: 607 versus 629, a 3.5% gap.
This top-tier receiver comparison measures an established elite market against a younger premium asset. Reception scoring and redraft context can move the price, but the current dynasty composite remains the transparent starting point.
Dynasty Superflex baseline
Malik Nabers
NYG · WR6 · age 23.1
629#16 overall
Same players // four markets
What changes in Superflex, 1QB, TEP, and redraft?
These rows change one major market context at a time. Hover or focus the dotted labels for a plain-language definition. Values share one 0–1,000 composite scale.
| League setting | CeeDee Lamb | Malik Nabers | Current answer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dynasty Superflex ⓘTwo QB-eligible starting slots; 4-point passing TDs and Standard scoring. | 607 | 629 | Same tier |
| Dynasty 1QB ⓘOne starting quarterback; 4-point passing TDs and Standard scoring. | 564 | 592 | Same tier |
| Superflex TEP ⓘSuperflex with an additional tight end reception premium. | 607 | 629 | Same tier |
| Redraft 1QB ⓘCurrent-season value only; one quarterback and Standard scoring. | 714 | 486 | CeeDee Lamb +228 |
Format verdict // The leader changes across formats. There is no defensible format-free winner; use the row that matches your league.
Reception scoring // player-level
Does standard, half PPR, or full PPR change it?
PPR means points per reception: zero in standard, 0.5 in half PPR, and one in full PPR. Each adjustment is measured relative to a same-position replacement player.
| League setting | CeeDee Lamb | Malik Nabers | Current answer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard ⓘReceptions score zero points; yards and touchdowns still score normally. | 607 | 629 | Same tier |
| Half PPR ⓘEach reception scores 0.5 points. | 653 | 661 | Same tier |
| Full PPR ⓘEach reception scores one point. | 680 | 683 | Same tier |
Scoring verdict: No leader flip appears in the displayed scoring settings. The gap ranges from 3 to 22 value points, so scoring can still change the price.
Observed production // 2025
The evidence underneath the market answer.
These are descriptive season results, not projections. Missing upstream fields remain visibly unavailable instead of being guessed.
CeeDee Lamb
WR7- Fantasy points/game
- 14.3
- Consistency grade
- B
- Targets/game
- 8.4
- Receptions/game
- 5.4
- Receiving yards/game
- 76.9
- Catch rate
- 64.1%
Malik Nabers
WR6- Fantasy points/game
- 3.4
- Consistency grade
- C
- Targets/game
- 2.1
- Receptions/game
- 1.1
- Receiving yards/game
- 15.9
- Catch rate
- 51.4%
Decision rule
Treat the gap like a tiebreaker.
Treat a small top-tier difference as negotiable, but do not ignore a clear current market gap simply because both players belong in elite lineups.
Yes, the current baseline supports treating CeeDee Lamb and Malik Nabers as straight-up trade peers. A manager can still prefer either side, but the model does not support a large automatic add. Injury status, starting-lineup need, and manager-specific preference are outside this model.
Direct answers
Comparison FAQ
Who is worth more in dynasty: CeeDee Lamb or Malik Nabers?
CeeDee Lamb and Malik Nabers are in the same current dynasty Superflex tier: 607 versus 629, a 3.5% gap.
Should I trade CeeDee Lamb for Malik Nabers straight up?
Yes, the current baseline supports treating CeeDee Lamb and Malik Nabers as straight-up trade peers. A manager can still prefer either side, but the model does not support a large automatic add.
Does scoring change the CeeDee Lamb vs. Malik Nabers comparison?
No leader flip appears in the displayed scoring settings. The gap ranges from 3 to 22 value points, so scoring can still change the price.
Why do Superflex and 1QB values differ?
Quarterback scarcity changes enough across the displayed formats to change which side leads. Use the row matching your league rather than the universal baseline.
Same-position decisions