Dynasty Superflex baseline
Brian Thomas
JAX · WR29 · age 23.9
276#81 overall
Head-to-head // WRRelease ftt-20260913T165752Z
Brian Thomas or Parker Washington: who has more dynasty value?
The short answer
Brian Thomas is currently worth more than Parker Washington in dynasty Superflex: 276 versus 256, a 7.2% gap.
A same-team receiver comparison makes the market gap and reception evidence more useful than a vague offense narrative. Standard through Full PPR values are calculated independently, with redraft showing the current-season price beside dynasty.
Dynasty Superflex baseline
Parker Washington
JAX · WR31 · age 24.5
256#87 overall
Same players // four markets
What changes in Superflex, 1QB, TEP, and redraft?
These rows change one major market context at a time. Hover or focus the dotted labels for a plain-language definition. Values share one 0–1,000 composite scale.
| League setting | Brian Thomas | Parker Washington | Current answer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dynasty Superflex ⓘTwo QB-eligible starting slots; 4-point passing TDs and Standard scoring. | 276 | 256 | Brian Thomas +20 |
| Dynasty 1QB ⓘOne starting quarterback; 4-point passing TDs and Standard scoring. | 254 | 239 | Brian Thomas +15 |
| Superflex TEP ⓘSuperflex with an additional tight end reception premium. | 276 | 256 | Brian Thomas +20 |
| Redraft 1QB ⓘCurrent-season value only; one quarterback and Standard scoring. | 122 | 175 | Parker Washington +53 |
Format verdict // The leader changes across formats. There is no defensible format-free winner; use the row that matches your league.
Reception scoring // player-level
Does standard, half PPR, or full PPR change it?
PPR means points per reception: zero in standard, 0.5 in half PPR, and one in full PPR. Each adjustment is measured relative to a same-position replacement player.
| League setting | Brian Thomas | Parker Washington | Current answer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard ⓘReceptions score zero points; yards and touchdowns still score normally. | 276 | 256 | Brian Thomas +20 |
| Half PPR ⓘEach reception scores 0.5 points. | 283 | 256 | Brian Thomas +27 |
| Full PPR ⓘEach reception scores one point. | 287 | 252 | Brian Thomas +35 |
Scoring verdict: No leader flip appears in the displayed scoring settings. The gap ranges from 20 to 35 value points, so scoring can still change the price.
Observed production // 2025
The evidence underneath the market answer.
These are descriptive season results, not projections. Missing upstream fields remain visibly unavailable instead of being guessed.
Brian Thomas
WR29- Fantasy points/game
- 9.9
- Consistency grade
- F
- Targets/game
- 6.5
- Receptions/game
- 3.4
- Receiving yards/game
- 50.5
- Catch rate
- 52.7%
Parker Washington
WR31- Fantasy points/game
- 11.5
- Consistency grade
- D
- Targets/game
- 5.9
- Receptions/game
- 3.6
- Receiving yards/game
- 52.9
- Catch rate
- 61.1%
Decision rule
Start with Brian Thomas's edge.
Respect a clear market tier difference, and use the scoring rows to size the gap rather than assuming teammates share the same role or ceiling.
Not at the baseline price. Brian Thomas holds the larger current value, so a straight swap gives up a 7.2% market edge before roster fit is considered. Injury status, starting-lineup need, and manager-specific preference are outside this model.
Direct answers
Comparison FAQ
Who is worth more in dynasty: Brian Thomas or Parker Washington?
Brian Thomas is currently worth more than Parker Washington in dynasty Superflex: 276 versus 256, a 7.2% gap.
Should I trade Brian Thomas for Parker Washington straight up?
Not at the baseline price. Brian Thomas holds the larger current value, so a straight swap gives up a 7.2% market edge before roster fit is considered.
Does scoring change the Brian Thomas vs. Parker Washington comparison?
No leader flip appears in the displayed scoring settings. The gap ranges from 20 to 35 value points, so scoring can still change the price.
Why do Superflex and 1QB values differ?
Quarterback scarcity changes enough across the displayed formats to change which side leads. Use the row matching your league rather than the universal baseline.
Same-position decisions