Dynasty Superflex baseline
Jalen Hurts
PHI · QB11 · age 28
556#31 overall
Head-to-head // QBRelease ftt-20260813T064417Z
Jalen Hurts vs. Trevor Lawrence
The short answer
Jalen Hurts and Trevor Lawrence are in the same current dynasty Superflex tier: 556 versus 558, a 0.4% gap.
A close Superflex price creates a useful stress test: does six-point passing-TD scoring move the players differently enough to break the apparent tie? The answer is derived from observed scoring profiles, not a blanket quarterback multiplier.
Open complete Jalen Hurts file →
Dynasty Superflex baseline
Trevor Lawrence
JAX · QB10 · age 26.9
558#29 overall
Same players // four markets
What changes in Superflex, 1QB, TEP, and redraft?
These rows change one major market context at a time. Hover or focus the dotted labels for a plain-language definition. Values share one 0–1,000 composite scale.
| League setting | Jalen Hurts | Trevor Lawrence | Current answer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dynasty Superflex ⓘTwo QB-eligible starting slots; 4-point passing TDs and full PPR. | 556 | 558 | Same tier |
| Dynasty 1QB ⓘOne starting quarterback; 4-point passing TDs and full PPR. | 420 | 397 | Jalen Hurts +23 |
| Superflex TEP ⓘSuperflex with an additional tight end reception premium. | 556 | 558 | Same tier |
| Redraft 1QB ⓘCurrent-season value only; one quarterback and full PPR. | 163 | 128 | Jalen Hurts +35 |
Format verdict // The leader changes across formats. There is no defensible format-free winner; use the row that matches your league.
Passing TD scoring // player-level
Does 4-point vs. 6-point passing TD scoring change it?
The added passing-TD points are calculated from each player’s observed rate, then measured against a replacement quarterback. It is not a generic multiplier.
| League setting | Jalen Hurts | Trevor Lawrence | Current answer |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-point passing TD ⓘEach passing touchdown scores four points; full PPR remains on. | 556 | 558 | Same tier |
| 6-point passing TD ⓘEach passing touchdown scores six points; full PPR remains on. | 570 | 574 | Same tier |
Scoring verdict: No leader flip appears in the displayed scoring settings. The gap ranges from 2 to 4 value points, so scoring can still change the price.
Observed production // 2025
The evidence underneath the market answer.
These are descriptive season results, not projections. Missing upstream fields remain visibly unavailable instead of being guessed.
Jalen Hurts
QB11- Fantasy points/game
- 17.9
- Consistency grade
- B
- Pass yards/game
- 189.6
- Pass TD/game
- 1.5
- Rush yards/game
- 24.8
- Completion rate
- 64.8%
Trevor Lawrence
QB10- Fantasy points/game
- 20.6
- Consistency grade
- A+
- Pass yards/game
- 235.7
- Pass TD/game
- 1.7
- Rush yards/game
- 21.1
- Completion rate
- 60.9%
Decision rule
Treat the gap like a tiebreaker.
If the format rows remain close, make the deal for roster construction rather than inventing precision the market does not contain.
Yes, the current baseline supports treating Jalen Hurts and Trevor Lawrence as straight-up trade peers. A manager can still prefer either side, but the model does not support a large automatic add. Injury status, starting-lineup need, and manager-specific preference are outside this model.
Direct answers
Comparison FAQ
Who is worth more in dynasty: Jalen Hurts or Trevor Lawrence?
Jalen Hurts and Trevor Lawrence are in the same current dynasty Superflex tier: 556 versus 558, a 0.4% gap.
Should I trade Jalen Hurts for Trevor Lawrence straight up?
Yes, the current baseline supports treating Jalen Hurts and Trevor Lawrence as straight-up trade peers. A manager can still prefer either side, but the model does not support a large automatic add.
Does scoring change the Jalen Hurts vs. Trevor Lawrence comparison?
No leader flip appears in the displayed scoring settings. The gap ranges from 2 to 4 value points, so scoring can still change the price.
Why do Superflex and 1QB values differ?
Quarterback scarcity changes enough across the displayed formats to change which side leads. Use the row matching your league rather than the universal baseline.
Same-position decisions