Dynasty Superflex baseline
Tetairoa McMillan
CAR · WR9 · age 23.4
559#28 overall
Head-to-head // WRRelease ftt-20260813T064417Z
Tetairoa McMillan vs. Emeka Egbuka
The short answer
Tetairoa McMillan and Emeka Egbuka are in the same current dynasty Superflex tier: 559 versus 552, a 1.3% gap.
This close young-receiver comparison is built to expose uncertainty rather than hide it. The page shows current values, underlying coverage, and how much standard-to-PPR scoring actually changes the spread.
Open complete Tetairoa McMillan file →
Dynasty Superflex baseline
Emeka Egbuka
TB · WR10 · age 23.8
552#32 overall
Same players // four markets
What changes in Superflex, 1QB, TEP, and redraft?
These rows change one major market context at a time. Hover or focus the dotted labels for a plain-language definition. Values share one 0–1,000 composite scale.
| League setting | Tetairoa McMillan | Emeka Egbuka | Current answer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dynasty Superflex ⓘTwo QB-eligible starting slots; 4-point passing TDs and full PPR. | 559 | 552 | Same tier |
| Dynasty 1QB ⓘOne starting quarterback; 4-point passing TDs and full PPR. | 583 | 566 | Same tier |
| Superflex TEP ⓘSuperflex with an additional tight end reception premium. | 559 | 552 | Same tier |
| Redraft 1QB ⓘCurrent-season value only; one quarterback and full PPR. | 388 | 382 | Same tier |
Format verdict // The same player leads all four markets, but the gap ranges from 6 to 17 points. Format still changes the price.
Reception scoring // player-level
Does standard, half PPR, or full PPR change it?
PPR means points per reception: zero in standard, 0.5 in half PPR, and one in full PPR. Each adjustment is measured relative to a same-position replacement player.
| League setting | Tetairoa McMillan | Emeka Egbuka | Current answer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard ⓘReceptions score zero points; yards and touchdowns still score normally. | 562 | 561 | Same tier |
| Half PPR ⓘEach reception scores 0.5 points. | 554 | 550 | Same tier |
| Full PPR ⓘEach reception scores one point. | 559 | 552 | Same tier |
Scoring verdict: No leader flip appears in the displayed scoring settings. The gap ranges from 1 to 7 value points, so scoring can still change the price.
Observed production // 2025
The evidence underneath the market answer.
These are descriptive season results, not projections. Missing upstream fields remain visibly unavailable instead of being guessed.
Tetairoa McMillan
WR9- Fantasy points/game
- 12.4
- Consistency grade
- D
- Targets/game
- 7.2
- Receptions/game
- 4.1
- Receiving yards/game
- 59.6
- Catch rate
- 57.4%
Emeka Egbuka
WR10- Fantasy points/game
- 11.5
- Consistency grade
- D
- Targets/game
- 7.5
- Receptions/game
- 3.7
- Receiving yards/game
- 55.2
- Catch rate
- 49.6%
Decision rule
Treat the gap like a tiebreaker.
When the evidence says same tier, negotiate around roster need and avoid pretending a few market points create certainty.
Yes, the current baseline supports treating Tetairoa McMillan and Emeka Egbuka as straight-up trade peers. A manager can still prefer either side, but the model does not support a large automatic add. Injury status, starting-lineup need, and manager-specific preference are outside this model.
Direct answers
Comparison FAQ
Who is worth more in dynasty: Tetairoa McMillan or Emeka Egbuka?
Tetairoa McMillan and Emeka Egbuka are in the same current dynasty Superflex tier: 559 versus 552, a 1.3% gap.
Should I trade Tetairoa McMillan for Emeka Egbuka straight up?
Yes, the current baseline supports treating Tetairoa McMillan and Emeka Egbuka as straight-up trade peers. A manager can still prefer either side, but the model does not support a large automatic add.
Does scoring change the Tetairoa McMillan vs. Emeka Egbuka comparison?
No leader flip appears in the displayed scoring settings. The gap ranges from 1 to 7 value points, so scoring can still change the price.
Why do Superflex and 1QB values differ?
Superflex makes starting quarterbacks scarcer, while 1QB pushes replacement closer to the starters. The displayed format gap ranges from 6 to 17 value points.
Same-position decisions